World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
7177
World Ranking
4486
National Ranking
1559

Ingo Schlupp publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Schlupp sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 208 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ingo Schlupp D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Schlupp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ingo Schlupp is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States and focuses their research primarily on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work encompasses several subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Aquatic Science, and Ecology.

The main topics explored by Schlupp's research include Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Plant and Animal Studies, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Fish Biology and Ecology Studies, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, and Fish Biology, Ecology, and Behavior.

Recent published papers by Ingo Schlupp illustrate the depth and variety of their research interests. These include:

  • Using machine learning and DeepLabCut in animal behavior, 2022, acta ethologica
  • Biogeography of the West Indies: A complex scenario for species radiations in terrestrial and aquatic habitats, 2021, Ecology and Evolution
  • Why do hybrids turn down sex?, 2023, Evolution
  • Sperm-dependent asexual species and their role in ecology and evolution, 2023, Ecology and Evolution
  • Sperm specificity and potential paternal effects in gynogenesis in the Amazon Molly (Poecilia formosa), 2023, PeerJ

Schlupp frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Rodet Rodríguez
  • Waldir M. Berbel-Filho
  • Montrai Spikes
  • Rüdiger Riesch
  • Kerri-Ann Bennett

The scientist's work is commonly published in venues such as Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Ecology and Evolution, Novitates Caribaea, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and PeerJ. Faculty Opinions holds the highest number of their contributions.

Best Publications

  • Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females

    Ingo Schlupp;Cathy Marler;Michael J. Ryan

  • EVOLUTIONARY ORIGIN OF A PARTHENOFORM, THE AMAZON MOLLY POECILIA FORMOSA, ON THE BASIS OF A MOLECULAR GENEALOGY.

    Manfred Schartl;Brigitta Wilde;Ingo Schlupp;Jakob Parzefall

  • THE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF GYNOGENESIS

    Ingo Schlupp

  • Incorporation of subgenomic amounts of DNA as compensation for mutational load in a gynogenetic fish

    Manfred Schartl;Indrajit Nanda;Ingo Schlupp;Brigitta Wilde

  • Male Sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males

    Ingo Schlupp;Michael J. Ryan

  • Ecology and Evolution of Poeciliid Fishes

    Jonathan P. Evans;Andrea Pilastro;Ingo Schlupp

  • Toxic hydrogen sulfide and dark caves: phenotypic and genetic divergence across two abiotic environmental gradients in Poecilia mexicana.

    Michael Tobler;Michael Tobler;Thomas J. DeWitt;Ingo Schlupp;Francisco J. García de León

  • Life on the edge: hydrogen sulfide and the fish communities of a Mexican cave and surrounding waters

    Michael Tobler;Michael Tobler;Ingo Schlupp;Ingo Schlupp;Katja U. Heubel;Rüdiger Riesch

  • The role of sexual harassment in cave and surface dwelling populations of the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei)

    Martin Plath;Jakob Parzefall;Ingo Schlupp

  • Monophyletic origin of multiple clonal lineages in an asexual fish (Poecilia formosa)

    Matthias Stöck;Kathrin P. Lampert;Dirk Möller;Ingo Schlupp;Ingo Schlupp

  • Sexual harassment in live-bearing fishes (Poeciliidae): comparing courting and noncourting species

    Martin Plath;Martin Plath;Amber M. Makowicz;Ingo Schlupp;Michael Tobler;Michael Tobler

  • Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana

    Martin Plath;Martin Plath;Dennis Blum;Ingo Schlupp;Ralph Tiedemann

  • Sexual harassment as a cost for molly females: Bigger males cost less

    Ingo Schlupp;Ryan Mc Knab;Michael J. Ryan;Martin-Luther-King Platz

  • Animal Communication Networks: Performing in front of an audience: signallers and the social environment

    Ricardo J. Matos;Ingo Schlupp

  • Biogeography of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa

    Ingo Schlupp;Ingo Schlupp;Jakob Parzefall;Manfred Schartl

  • Sexual selection in darkness? Female mating preferences in surface- and cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei)

    Martin Plath;Jakob Parzefall;Kay E. Körner;Ingo Schlupp

  • Chromosomal evidence for laboratory synthesis of a triploid hybrid between the gynogenetic teleost Poecilia formosa and its host species

    I. Nanda;M. Schartl;W. Feichtinger;I. Schlupp

  • Toxic hydrogen sulfide and dark caves: life-history adaptations in a livebearing fish (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae)

    Rüdiger Riesch;Martin Plath;Ingo Schlupp

  • Local adaptation and pronounced genetic differentiation in an extremophile fish, Poecilia mexicana, inhabiting a Mexican cave with toxic hydrogen sulphide.

    M. Plath;J. S. Hauswaldt;K. Moll;M. Tobler;M. Tobler

  • Considerations on the use of video playbacks as visual stimuli: The Lisbon workshop consensus

    Rui Filipe Oliveira;Gil G. Rosenthal;Ingo Schlupp;Peter K. McGregor

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Plath
Martin Plath Universidade de São Paulo
Michael Tobler
Michael Tobler Kansas State University
Rüdiger Riesch
Rüdiger Riesch Royal Holloway University of London
Manfred Schartl
Manfred Schartl University of Würzburg
Ralph Tiedemann
Ralph Tiedemann University of Potsdam
Indrajit Nanda
Indrajit Nanda University of Würzburg
Jörg T. Epplen
Jörg T. Epplen Ruhr University Bochum
Bruno Streit
Bruno Streit Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael J. Ryan
Michael J. Ryan The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of related fields that blend scientific study, communication, and healthcare. For those interested in managing or sharing scientific knowledge, a cheapest masters in library science program can equip you with the skills to work in research libraries, archives, or digital information environments.

Communication skills are critical in science, particularly for those supporting people with communication needs. Accredited options like asha approved online speech pathology programs offer flexibility for students and often lead to rewarding, in-demand careers. If your undergraduate background isn't in speech or communication sciences, an slp bridge program online offers a way to transition smoothly into the field.

For ecology and evolution majors interested in healthcare, accelerated nursing programs like online absn programs for non nurses enable graduates to leverage their science background and enter nursing faster.

Exploring online degrees in these fields can broaden career options and help you discover new ways to apply your scientific expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Ingo Schlupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles