World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gil G. Rosenthal

Gil G. Rosenthal

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
7551
World Ranking
4277
National Ranking
76

Gil G. Rosenthal publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil G. Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 147 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gil G. Rosenthal D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil G. Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gil G. Rosenthal is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also in Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their work spans key subfields such as Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Molecular Biology. The main topics they address include genetic diversity and population structure, animal behavior and reproduction, plant and animal studies, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, wildlife ecology and conservation, genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities, and reproductive biology with impacts on aquatic species.

Recent publications by Rosenthal include the following papers:

  • Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin, 2022, Science
  • Natural hybridization reveals incompatible alleles that cause melanoma in swordtail fish, 2020, Science
  • The Genetic Architecture of Variation in the Sexually Selected Sword Ornament and Its Evolution in Hybrid Populations, 2021, Current Biology
  • Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes, 2021, Biology Letters
  • Genomic insights into variation in thermotolerance between hybridizing swordtail fishes, 2022, Molecular Ecology

Frequent co-authors in their research include Daniel L. Powell, Molly Schumer, Shreya M. Banerjee, Peter Andolfatto, and Cheyenne Payne.

Rosenthal publishes regularly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Science, Molecular Ecology, Molecular Ecology Resources, and Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Best Publications

  • Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes

    Molly Schumer;Chenling Xu;Daniel L. Powell;Arun Durvasula

  • HOW COMMON IS HOMOPLOID HYBRID SPECIATION

    Molly Schumer;Gil G. Rosenthal;Peter Andolfatto

  • Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size

    Gil G. Rosenthal;Christopher S. Evans

  • Alteration of the chemical environment disrupts communication in a freshwater fish.

    Heidi S Fisher;Bob Bern Ming Wong;Gil G Rosenthal;Gil G Rosenthal

  • Mate Choice: The Evolution of Sexual Decision Making from Microbes to Humans

    Gil G. Rosenthal

  • A private ultraviolet channel in visual communication

    Molly E. Cummings;Gil G. Rosenthal;Michael J. Ryan

  • Phylogenomics reveals extensive reticulate evolution in Xiphophorus fishes.

    Rongfeng Cui;Molly Schumer;Karla Kruesi;Ronald Walter

  • The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback

    G. I. L. G. Rosenthal;A. Stanley Rand;Michael J. Ryan;Michael J. Ryan

  • Repeated losses of PRDM9-directed recombination despite the conservation of PRDM9 across vertebrates

    Zachary Baker;Molly Schumer;Molly Schumer;Yuki Haba;Lisa Bashkirova

  • Shared preferences by predators and females for male ornaments in swordtails.

    Gil G. Rosenthal;Tania Y. Flores Martinez;Francisco J. García de León;Michael J. Ryan

  • High-resolution mapping reveals hundreds of genetic incompatibilities in hybridizing fish species

    Molly Schumer;Rongfeng Cui;Daniel L Powell;Rebecca Dresner

  • Assortative preferences for stripes in danios

    Gil G. Rosenthal;Michael J. Ryan

  • Reproductive isolation of hybrid populations driven by genetic incompatibilities.

    Molly Schumer;Rongfeng Cui;Gil G. Rosenthal;Peter Andolfatto

  • Natural hybridization reveals incompatible alleles that cause melanoma in swordtail fish

    Daniel L. Powell;Daniel L. Powell;Mateo García-Olazábal;Mackenzie Keegan;Patrick Reilly

  • Replicated hybrid zones of Xiphophorus swordtails along an elevational gradient

    Z. W. Culumber;H. S. Fisher;M. Tobler;M. Tobler;M. Mateos

  • Female preference for dynamic traits in the green swordtail,Xiphophorus helleri

    Gil G. Rosenthal;Christopher S. Evans;William L. Miller

  • The role of sexual selection in maintaining a colour polymorphism in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus pygmaeus

    Jennifer J. Kingston;Gil G. Rosenthal;Michael J. Ryan

  • The shape of things to come: linking developmental plasticity to post‐metamorphic morphology in anurans

    I. Gomez-Mestre;I. Gomez-Mestre;I. Gomez-Mestre;V. L. Saccoccio;T. Iijima;E. M. Collins

  • Female swordtail fish use chemical cues to select well-fed mates

    Heidi S. Fisher;Gil G. Rosenthal

  • Species recognition by male swordtails via chemical cues

    Bob Bern Ming Wong;Heidi S Fisher;Gil G Rosenthal

  • Female disdain for swords in a swordtail fish

    Bob Bern Ming Wong;Gil G Rosenthal

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Andolfatto
Peter Andolfatto Columbia University
Michael J. Ryan
Michael J. Ryan The University of Texas at Austin
Bob B. M. Wong
Bob B. M. Wong Monash University
Molly Przeworski
Molly Przeworski Columbia University
Michael Tobler
Michael Tobler Kansas State University
Adam Jones
Adam Jones University of Idaho
Alastair J. Wilson
Alastair J. Wilson University of Exeter
Suzanne H. Alonzo
Suzanne H. Alonzo University of California, Santa Cruz
David Reich
David Reich Harvard Medical School
Ivan Gomez-Mestre
Ivan Gomez-Mestre Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can be a great way to start or advance your career in fields linked to Ecology and Evolution, such as healthcare or scientific research. Flexible formats and accelerated courses now make it easier for students to balance their education with other commitments.

For instance, healthcare professionals often seek swift educational pathways to broaden their expertise. Programs like the shortest rn to bsn program and bridge options such as asn to np enable registered nurses to quickly enhance qualifications, opening new roles across healthcare, including lab work and community education.

Even those without prior nursing experience can pursue advanced healthcare careers through online msn programs for non nurses. These degrees can be relevant for students interested in public health, epidemiology, or policy—fields that overlap with ecology studies.

It’s also important to compare schools to find the best fit for your goals. Detailed comparisons, such as wgu vs chamberlain, offer insight into program pace, cost, and curriculum—key factors when choosing an online degree to complement your ecological career path.

Best Scientists Citing Gil G. Rosenthal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles