World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret M. Keane

Margaret M. Keane

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
5087
World Ranking
11319
National Ranking
5917

Neuroscience

D-Index
30
Citations
5087
World Ranking
9592
National Ranking
4055

Margaret M. Keane publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret M. Keane sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Margaret M. Keane D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret M. Keane sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret M. Keane is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, as well as related areas such as general decision sciences and social psychology.

Keane's recent publications cover various topics within neuroscience and behavioral studies. Notable papers include "Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task" (2021, PLoS ONE), "The status of semantic memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia varies with demands on scene construction" (2020, Cortex), and "Episodic processes in moral decisions: Evidence from medial temporal lobe amnesia" (2021, Hippocampus).

The researcher has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Mieke Verfaellie, Renée Hunsberger, Virginie Patt, Dominoe A. Jones, and Kristin Lynch. These collaborations have contributed to their work across multiple fields and topics.

Frequent publication venues for Keane's work include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Cortex
  • Hippocampus

Keane's main fields of study encompass:

  • Neuroscience

Their subfields of study include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Social Psychology

The main topics explored in Keane's research are:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Best Publications

  • Combining prototypes: A selective modification model.

    Edward E. Smith;Daniel N. Osherson;Lance J. Rips;Margaret Keane

  • Double Dissociation Between Memory Systems Underlying Explicit and Implicit Memory in the Human Brain

    John D.E. Gabrieli;John D.E. Gabrieli;John D.E. Gabrieli;Debra A. Fleischman;Margaret M. Keane;Sheryl L. Reminger

  • Medial Temporal Lobe Damage Causes Deficits in Episodic Memory and Episodic Future Thinking Not Attributable to Deficits in Narrative Construction

    Elizabeth Race;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer's disease

    M M Keane;J D Gabrieli;A C Fennema;J H Growdon

  • Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions

    Margaret M. Keane;John D. E. Gabrieli;Heather C. Mapstone;Keith A. Johnson

  • Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model

    Unknown

  • Dissociations Among Structural-Perceptual, Lexical-Semantic, and Event-Fact Memory Systems in Alzheimer, Amnesic, and Normal Subjects

    John D.E. Gabrieli;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Ben Z. Stanger;Margaret M. Kjelgaard

  • Intact priming of patterns despite impaired memory.

    John D.E. Gabrieli;William Milberg;Margaret M. Keane;Suzanne Corkin

  • The medial temporal lobes are critical for reward-based decision making under conditions that promote episodic future thinking.

    Daniela J. Palombo;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Disproportionate deficit in associative recognition relative to item recognition in global amnesia.

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane

  • The Contribution of Familiarity to Associative Memory in Amnesia

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.

    Chandan J. Vaidya;John D. E. Gabrieli;Margaret M. Keane;Laura A. Monti

  • Losing sight of the future: Impaired semantic prospection following medial temporal lobe lesions.

    Elizabeth Race;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Impaired Category Fluency in Medial Temporal Lobe Amnesia: The Role of Episodic Memory

    Daniel L. Greenberg;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Lee Ryan;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Priming in perceptual identification of pseudowords is normal in Alzheimer's disease.

    Margaret M. Keane;John D.E. Gabrieli;John D.E. Gabrieli;John D.E. Gabrieli;John H. Growdon;John H. Growdon;Suzanne Corkin

  • Preservation of Implicit Memory for New Associations in Global Amnesia

    John D.E. Gabrieli;Margaret M. Keane;Melissa M. Zarella;Russell A. Poldrack

  • Perceptual and conceptual memory processes in global amnesia.

    Chandan J. Vaidya;John D. E. Gabrieli;Margaret M. Keane;Laura A. Monti

  • Intact and impaired conceptual memory processes in amnesia.

    Margaret M. Keane;John D. E. Gabrieli;Laura A. Monti;Debra A. Fleischman

  • Elevated False Recognition in Patients with Frontal Lobe Damage Is Neither a General Nor a Unitary Phenomenon

    Mieke Verfaellie;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane;Michael P. Alexander;Michael P. Alexander;Michael P. Alexander

  • How does the hippocampus shape decisions

    Daniela J. Palombo;Daniela J. Palombo;Margaret M. Keane;Mieke Verfaellie;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Recognition memory in amnesia: effects of relaxing response criteria.

    Mieke Verfaellie;Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;Margaret M. Keane;Margaret M. Keane

Frequent Co-Authors

Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
John H. Growdon
John H. Growdon Harvard University
Michael P. Alexander
Michael P. Alexander Harvard University
Chandan J. Vaidya
Chandan J. Vaidya Georgetown University
Debra A. Fleischman
Debra A. Fleischman Rush University Medical Center
Alice Cronin-Golomb
Alice Cronin-Golomb Boston University
James M. Cantor
James M. Cantor Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience but need more flexibility, a variety of accredited online programs can open doors to rewarding careers. Exploring job certifications online can help you quickly gain marketable skills and improve your job prospects, often within a few months.

Budget is a common concern for students. Fortunately, there are pathways such as the cheapest easiest online degree programs, which can make higher education more accessible and less stressful financially.

For those considering a blend of human behavior and mental health, online msw programs affordable offer a solid foundation for social work and counseling careers, while keeping tuition in check.

Finally, roles in behavior analysis are expanding. Pursuing online bcba programs can prepare you for specialized roles in education, therapy, and research—often in a cost-effective and flexible manner.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret M. Keane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles