World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christian Agrillo

Christian Agrillo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9273 8669 201 197 113 4588

Christian Agrillo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christian Agrillo between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christian Agrillo published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2020. 7 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2020. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 13 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christian Agrillo: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 1
2008 4
2009 7
2010 3
2011 3
2012 16
2013 10
2014 8
2015 12
2016 7
2017 11
2018 1
2019 13
2020 19
2021 8
2022 6
2023 3
2024 5
2025 6
2026 1
Total 146
Download as CSV

Christian Agrillo publications per year - data summary

  • Christian Agrillo, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, has 146 publications recorded across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 19 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2007, 2018 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 7.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.0 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 21 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 36 publications (5.1 per year); 2013-2019: 62 publications (8.9 per year); 2020-2026: 48 publications (6.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Christian Agrillo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Agrillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 113
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christian Agrillo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Christian Agrillo, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, records 113 publications - the 28th percentile of the discipline.
  • 28% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Christian Agrillo, and about 72% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Christian Agrillo ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Christian Agrillo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Agrillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Christian Agrillo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Christian Agrillo, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, records 37 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Christian Agrillo, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Christian Agrillo ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Christian Agrillo is a researcher affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy, focusing primarily on neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, cell biology, and nature and landscape conservation. The main research topics cover cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, visual perception and processing mechanisms, zebrafish biomedical research applications, animal behavior and reproduction, child and animal learning development, primate behavior and ecology, and fish biology, ecology, and behavior.

Christian Agrillo's research output includes publications in various scientific venues with a notable frequency in the following journals:

  • Animals
  • Animal Cognition
  • Scientific Reports
  • Symmetry
  • Vision

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Christian Agrillo are:

  • Everything is subjective under water surface, too: visual illusions in fish (2020, Animal Cognition)
  • Quantitative abilities of invertebrates: a methodological review (2021, Animal Cognition)
  • Do Domestic Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Perceive Numerosity Illusions? (2020, Animals)
  • The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation (2021, Animals)
  • The ontogeny of continuous quantity discrimination in zebrafish larvae (Danio rerio) (2020, Animal Cognition)

Frequent collaborators in Christian Agrillo's research include:

  • Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
  • Maria Santacà
  • Alessandra Pecunioso
  • Marco Dadda
  • Angelo Bisazza

Best Publications

  • Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies.

    Christian Agrillo;Laura Piffer;Angelo Bisazza;Brian Butterworth

  • Use of number by fish.

    Christian Agrillo;Marco Dadda;Giovanna Serena;Angelo Bisazza

  • Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish

    Christian Agrillo;Marco Dadda;Angelo Bisazza

  • Childfree by choice: a review

    Christian Agrillo;Cristian Nelini

  • Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish.

    Christian Agrillo;Laura Piffer;Angelo Bisazza

  • Quantity discrimination in felines: a preliminary investigation of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus)

    Paola Etel Pisa;Christian Agrillo

  • Ontogeny of Numerical Abilities in Fish

    Angelo Bisazza;Laura Piffer;Giovanna Serena;Christian Agrillo

  • Large Number Discrimination by Mosquitofish

    Christian Agrillo;Laura Piffer;Angelo Bisazza

  • Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals

    Christian Agrillo;Angelo Bisazza

  • Small and large number discrimination in guppies.

    Laura Piffer;Christian Agrillo;Daniel C. Hyde

  • Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish

    Marco Dadda;Laura Piffer;Christian Agrillo;Angelo Bisazza

  • The costs of hemispheric specialization in a fish

    Marco Dadda;Eugenia Zandonà;Christian Agrillo;Angelo Bisazza

  • Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount

    Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato;Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini;Christian Agrillo;Angelo Bisazza

  • Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM.

    Christian Agrillo;Laura Piffer;Andrea Adriano

  • Near-death experiences between science and prejudice

    Enrico Facco;Christian Agrillo

  • Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies

    Christian Agrillo;Angelo Bisazza

  • Near-death experience: Out-of-body and out-of-brain?

    Christian Agrillo

  • Large number discrimination in newborn fish.

    Laura Piffer;Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini;Christian Agrillo

  • Extensive training extends numerical abilities of guppies

    Angelo Bisazza;Christian Agrillo;Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato

  • Do Fish Perceive Illusory Motion

    Simone Gori;Christian Agrillo;Marco Dadda;Angelo Bisazza

  • Time and numerosity estimation are independent: Behavioral evidence for two different systems using a conflict paradigm.

    Christian Agrillo;Ashish Ranpura;Brian Butterworth

  • Near-Death-Like Experiences without Life-Threatening Conditions or Brain Disorders: A Hypothesis from a Case Report.

    Enrico Facco;Christian Agrillo

  • Sexual Harassment Influences Group Choice in Female Mosquitofish

    Christian Agrillo;Marco Dadda;Angelo Bisazza

  • Perceiving numerosity from birth.

    Maria Dolores de Hevia;Elisa Castaldi;Arlette Streri;Evelyn Eger

  • What is the precise role of cognitive control in the development of a sense of number

    Rebecca Merkley;Gaia Scerif;Daniel Ansari

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelo Bisazza
Angelo Bisazza University of Padua
Michael J. Beran
Michael J. Beran Georgia State University
Brian Butterworth
Brian Butterworth University College London
Martin Giurfa
Martin Giurfa Sorbonne University
Bruce Greyson
Bruce Greyson University of Virginia
Culum Brown
Culum Brown Macquarie University
Bahador Bahrami
Bahador Bahrami Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Prospective students can explore undergraduate and graduate programs that suit their goals and schedules. Many universities now offer flexible online psychology degrees that make higher education accessible from virtually anywhere.

When considering your academic journey, it’s helpful to review programs recognized for their quality and student outcomes. Some of the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Delaware are known for their strong curricula and supportive online communities. If you’re closer to Texas, you might want to look into the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Fort Worth, which offer diverse concentrations.

For those pursuing advanced study or research-based careers, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Kent provide strong pathways to further specialization. Similarly, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Las Vegas emphasize practical skills and hands-on training.

No matter your location, exploring these programs can help you find the right fit and set you on the path toward rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Christian Agrillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles