World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10211 9583 5250 4850 431 24596

Mark E. Schweitzer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. Schweitzer between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. Schweitzer published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2006. 5 of the 442 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2006. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 22 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1989 2025

442 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. Schweitzer: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 2
1991 4
1992 10
1993 15
1994 9
1995 18
1996 13
1997 22
1998 22
1999 20
2000 18
2001 17
2002 19
2003 11
2004 11
2005 18
2006 26
2007 26
2008 24
2009 19
2010 12
2011 14
2012 10
2013 11
2014 9
2015 3
2016 6
2017 8
2018 16
2019 14
2020 4
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 3
2025 2
Total 442
Download as CSV

Mark E. Schweitzer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Schweitzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 431 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 431
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark E. Schweitzer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Schweitzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark E. Schweitzer is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The scientist's recent publications cover various aspects of medical imaging and related fields. Notable papers include:

  • Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update, 2024, Radiology Artificial Intelligence
  • Abnormal blood-brain barrier water exchange in chronic multiple sclerosis lesions: A preliminary study, 2020, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Impact of Education-based HEART Score Pathway on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Utilization and Yield in the Emergency Department, 2020, Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Reporting and Data System for Musculoskeletal Infections: Could This Bring Musculoskeletal Radiology Up to Date?, 2024, Radiology
  • Quantitative analysis of repaired rabbit supraspinatus tendons (± channeling) using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla, 2021, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Their research spans multiple subfields, including:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neurology

Main topics of interest in their work encompass:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis

Mark E. Schweitzer has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Radiology Artificial Intelligence
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Radiology
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Collaborators who have frequently co-authored works with Schweitzer include:

  • Ali S. Tejani
  • Michail E. Klontzas
  • Anthony A. Gatti
  • John Mongan
  • Linda Moy

Best Publications

  • Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme.

    Steven M. Raikin;Ilan Elias;Adam C. Zoga;William B. Morrison

  • MR Imaging Findings in Spinal Infections: Rules or Myths?

    Hans Peter Ledermann;Mark E. Schweitzer;William B. Morrison;John A. Carrino

  • Special focus session. MR arthrography.

    Lynne S. Steinbach;William E. Palmer;Mark E. Schweitzer

  • Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation.

    J Hodler;S Kursunoglu-Brahme;S J Snyder;V Cervilla

  • Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

    W B Morrison;M E Schweitzer;G W Bock;D G Mitchell

  • Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

    Lawrence M. White;Jae K. Kim;Mitesh Mehta;Naeem Merchant

  • MR Imaging of Disorders of the Achilles Tendon

    Mark E. Schweitzer;David Karasick

  • Normal variants and diseases of the peroneal tendons and superior peroneal retinaculum: MR imaging features.

    Xiao-Tian Wang;Zehava Sadka Rosenberg;Michael B. Mechlin;Mark E. Schweitzer

  • MR imaging of the infrapatellar fat pad of Hoffa.

    Jon A. Jacobson;Leon Lenchik;Leon Lenchik;Leon Lenchik;Michael K. Ruhoy;Mark E. Schweitzer

  • MRI Findings of Septic Arthritis and Associated Osteomyelitis in Adults

    Michael Karchevsky;Mark E. Schweitzer;William B. Morrison;J. Antoni Parellada

  • Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: MR diagnosis.

    E W Emig;M E Schweitzer;D Karasick;J Lubowitz

  • Medial collateral ligament injuries: evaluation of multiple signs, prevalence and location of associated bone bruises, and assessment with MR imaging.

    M E Schweitzer;D Tran;D M Deely;E L Hume

  • Anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of multiple signs with MR imaging.

    P L Robertson;M E Schweitzer;A R Bartolozzi;A Ugoni

  • Pigmented villonodular synovitis: MRI characteristics

    T. H. Hughes;D. J. Sartoris;D. J. Sartoris;M. E. Schweitzer;D. L. Resnick

  • MR appearance of idiopathic synovial osteochondromatosis

    Josef Kramer;Michael Recht;Diane M. Deely;Mark Schweitzer

  • Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema

    M E Schweitzer;L M White

  • The os trigonum syndrome: imaging features.

    D Karasick;M E Schweitzer

  • MRI Findings Associated with Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury

    Kevin W. Brown;William B. Morrison;Mark E. Schweitzer;J. Antoni Parellada

  • Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs.

    W B Morrison;M E Schweitzer;W G Batte;D P Radack

  • Chronic wrist pain: spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography.

    M E Schweitzer;S K Brahme;J Hodler;G J Hanker

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald Resnick
Donald Resnick University of California, San Diego
John A. Carrino
John A. Carrino Hospital for Special Surgery
Donald G. Mitchell
Donald G. Mitchell Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
James S. Babb
James S. Babb New York University
Alexander R. Vaccaro
Alexander R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University
Ghassan Hamarneh
Ghassan Hamarneh Simon Fraser University
Jon A. Jacobson
Jon A. Jacobson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul E. Beaulé
Paul E. Beaulé University of Ottawa
Juerg Hodler
Juerg Hodler University of Zurich
Mark S. Freedman
Mark S. Freedman Ottawa Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA is a significant commitment, but there are diverse online degree options and career pathways, especially in the nursing field. For those wanting to advance into academia or leadership in healthcare, consider accredited programs like online nursing PhD programs. These doctorates can open doors to high-level research, teaching, or organizational roles in healthcare.

If you are an RN looking to boost your credentials cost-effectively, explore the cheapest RN to BSN online programs. These programs are designed for working nurses, allowing you to complete your bachelor's degree flexibly and affordably.

Individuals without a nursing background interested in a rapid transition into the field should investigate direct entry MSN programs for non-nursing majors. These programs provide a streamlined route to advanced practice and leadership roles.

Still exploring your options? You might want to know what's the easiest nursing program to get into? Comparing admission requirements and program flexibility will help you find the best fit for your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Schweitzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles