World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11868 11164 6088 5634 443 26685

Donald G. Mitchell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Donald G. Mitchell between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Donald G. Mitchell published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 78 publications in 2018. 7 of the 1,199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 78. Peak 78 publications in 2018. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 19 publications 1988: 19 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 22 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 20 publications 1993: 28 publications 1994: 23 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 23 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 33 publications 2002: 39 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 36 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 50 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 78 publications 2019: 58 publications 2020: 49 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1957 2025

1,199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Donald G. Mitchell: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 5
1984 0
1985 9
1986 9
1987 19
1988 19
1989 13
1990 22
1991 14
1992 20
1993 28
1994 23
1995 16
1996 18
1997 23
1998 7
1999 16
2000 23
2001 33
2002 39
2003 20
2004 36
2005 44
2006 34
2007 28
2008 47
2009 50
2010 43
2011 26
2012 26
2013 47
2014 54
2015 44
2016 52
2017 54
2018 78
2019 58
2020 49
2021 29
2022 4
2023 5
2024 6
2025 1
Total 1,199
Download as CSV

Donald G. Mitchell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald G. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 443 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 443
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Donald G. Mitchell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald G. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Donald G. Mitchell is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with specific focus areas including Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Hepatology, and Oncology.

The scientist's recent scholarly contributions cover various topics related to liver disease and medical imaging. These topics include:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions

Some of their notable recent publications are:

  • "LI-RADS: Looking Back, Looking Forward", 2023, Radiology
  • "Beyond the Liver Function Tests: A Radiologist's Guide to the Liver Blood Tests", 2021, Radiographics
  • "Interpreting body MRI cases: classic findings in pelvic MRI", 2020, Abdominal Radiology
  • "Biliary excretion of gadobenate dimeglumine causing degradation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)", 2020, Abdominal Radiology
  • "Hepatic Steatosis After Partial Pancreatectomy in a Cohort of Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm", 2023, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology

Frequent publication venues in which Mitchell has contributed include:

  • Abdominal Radiology
  • Radiology
  • Radiographics
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Collaborative research efforts involve several frequent coauthors:

  • Flavius F. Guglielmo
  • Haresh Naringrekar
  • Leann Kania
  • Victoria Chernyak
  • Richard Kinh Gian

Best Publications

  • Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

    Victoria Chernyak;Kathryn J. Fowler;Aya Kamaya;Ania Z. Kielar

  • Femoral head avascular necrosis: correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings.

    D G Mitchell;V M Rao;M K Dalinka;C E Spritzer

  • Pancreatic Cysts: Depiction on Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo MR Images

    Xiao-Ming Zhang;Donald G. Mitchell;Masako Dohke;George A. Holland

  • Color Doppler imaging of the eye and orbit. Technique and normal vascular anatomy.

    Wolfgang E. Lieb;Steven M. Cohen;Daniel A. Merton;Jerry A. Shields

  • LI‐RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI‐RADS Management Working Group and future directions

    Donald G. Mitchell;Jordi Bruix;Morris Sherman;Claude B. Sirlin

  • Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging.

    D G Mitchell;M Crovello;T Matteucci;R O Petersen

  • ADC Measurement of Abdominal Organs and Lesions Using Parallel Imaging Technique

    Takeshi Yoshikawa;Hideaki Kawamitsu;Donald G. Mitchell;Yoshiharu Ohno

  • The Added Role of MR Imaging in Treatment Stratification of Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

    Evis Sala;Andrea G. Rockall;Susan J. Freeman;Donald G. Mitchell

  • Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: Tumor Delineation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Computed Tomography, and Clinical Examination, Verified by Pathologic Results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study

    Donald G. Mitchell;Bradley Snyder;Fergus Coakley;Caroline Reinhold

  • Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.

    Alfred B. Kurtz;John V. Tsimikas;Clare M. C. Tempany;Ulrike M. Hamper

  • Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

    W B Morrison;M E Schweitzer;G W Bock;D G Mitchell

  • Biliary Dilatation: Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Causes—Value of Adding Conventional MR Imaging to MR Cholangiopancreatography

    Myeong-Jin Kim;Donald G. Mitchell;Katsuyoshi Ito;Eric K. Outwater

  • Role of Imaging in Pretreatment Evaluation of Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: Results of the Intergroup Study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651–Gynecologic Oncology Group 183

    Hedvig Hricak;Constantine Gatsonis;Dennis S. Chi;Marco A. Amendola

  • Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

    An Tang;Mustafa R. Bashir;Michael T. Corwin;Irene Cruite

  • Rotator cuff tears: prospective comparison of MR imaging with arthrography, sonography, and surgery.

    DL Burk;D Karasick;AB Kurtz;DG Mitchell

  • Color Doppler imaging: principles, limitations, and artifacts.

    D G Mitchell

  • Cirrhosis: Modified Caudate–Right Lobe Ratio

    Hitomi Awaya;Donald G Mitchell;Tamotsu Kamishima;George Holland

  • Distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses: value of T1-weighted chemical-shift MR imaging.

    E K Outwater;E S Siegelman;P D Radecki;C W Piccoli

  • Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images.

    E K Outwater;R O Petersen;E S Siegelman;L G Gomella

  • 2017 version of LI-RADS for CT and MR imaging: An update

    Khaled M. Elsayes;Jonathan C. Hooker;Michelle M. Agrons;Ania Z. Kielar

Frequent Co-Authors

Stamatios M. Krimigis
Stamatios M. Krimigis Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Edmond C. Roelof
Edmond C. Roelof Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
M. K. Dougherty
M. K. Dougherty Imperial College London
William S. Kurth
William S. Kurth University of Iowa
Ralph L. McNutt
Ralph L. McNutt Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Nathan A. Schwadron
Nathan A. Schwadron University of New Hampshire
Louis J. Lanzerotti
Louis J. Lanzerotti New Jersey Institute of Technology
David J. McComas
David J. McComas Princeton University
Chris S. Arridge
Chris S. Arridge Lancaster University
Pontus C. Brandt
Pontus C. Brandt Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside studying Medicine in the USA, students often explore alternative healthcare pathways and online programs that support flexible learning and career advancement. Many seek specialized courses like medical billing and coding, which can open doors to administrative roles in healthcare. Understanding the average cost of medical billing and coding program is vital for those looking for budget-friendly entry into the field.

For those aiming for advanced clinical roles, pursuing a nurse practitioner pathway is a popular option. If affordability is key, researching the most affordable nurse practitioner programs can help you achieve your goals while keeping costs manageable.

Registered nurses looking to enhance their qualifications may consider RN to BSN programs, many of which are fully online and cost-effective. Finding the cheapest rn to bsn online can make a significant difference in total educational expenses.

Those committed to reaching the highest levels in nursing can now pursue a doctorate remotely. Numerous online nursing doctoral programs offer flexibility and affordability for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Donald G. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles