World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander M. Rush

Alexander M. Rush

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
24490
World Ranking
2533
National Ranking
1265

Alexander M. Rush publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander M. Rush sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alexander M. Rush D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander M. Rush sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language
  • Machine learning

His primary areas of investigation include Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Machine learning, Machine translation and Automatic summarization. His research in Word, Recurrent neural network, Parsing, Question answering and Feature learning are components of Artificial intelligence. His Natural language processing research includes elements of Speech recognition and Transformer.

His research in the fields of Artificial neural network and Autoencoder overlaps with other disciplines such as Key and Discretization. As a part of the same scientific study, Alexander M. Rush usually deals with the Machine translation, concentrating on Programming language and frequently concerns with Feature, Translation, CUDA and Deep learning. In his research, Attention model and Training set is intimately related to Sentence, which falls under the overarching field of Automatic summarization.

His most cited work include:

  • A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization (1249 citations)
  • Character-aware neural language models (1033 citations)
  • OpenNMT: Open-Source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translation (1007 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Alexander M. Rush spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Machine learning, Language model and Inference. Sentence, Deep learning, Parsing, Automatic summarization and Word are the primary areas of interest in his Artificial intelligence study. His Automatic summarization study combines topics in areas such as Domain, Paraphrase, Attention model and Training set.

His Natural language processing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Recurrent neural network, Simple, Speech recognition and Coreference. His research in Machine learning intersects with topics in Generative grammar, State, Natural language and Machine translation. His Inference study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Latent variable, Question answering, Graphical model, Structure and Pattern recognition.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (74.36%)
  • Natural language processing (31.41%)
  • Machine learning (28.85%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (74.36%)
  • Machine learning (28.85%)
  • Transformer (7.69%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Alexander M. Rush mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Transformer, Natural language processing and Deep learning. His studies in Artificial intelligence integrate themes in fields like Structure and Simple. His Leverage, Product of experts and Value study in the realm of Machine learning interacts with subjects such as Training.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Algorithm and Machine translation in addition to Transformer. His research integrates issues of Document retrieval, Similarity and Rank in his study of Natural language processing. The concepts of his Inference study are interwoven with issues in Language model and Relaxation.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing (314 citations)
  • Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning (20 citations)
  • Visual Interaction with Deep Learning Models through Collaborative Semantic Inference (20 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language
  • Machine learning

Alexander M. Rush mainly focuses on Artificial intelligence, Deep learning, Algorithm, Transformer and Simple. His studies deal with areas such as Machine learning, Human–computer interaction and Natural language processing as well as Artificial intelligence. In general Natural language processing, his work in Noun and Syntax is often linked to Concreteness linking many areas of study.

The Deep learning study which covers Inference that intersects with Floating point, Quantization, Artificial neural network and Interaction design. His work deals with themes such as Language model, Supervised learning and Transfer of learning, which intersect with Algorithm. The study incorporates disciplines such as Decoding methods, Markov chain and Machine translation in addition to Transformer.

Best Publications

  • A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization

    Alexander M. Rush;Sumit Chopra;Jason Weston

  • Character-aware neural language models

    Yoon Kim;Yacine Jernite;David Sontag;Alexander M. Rush

  • OpenNMT: Open-Source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translation

    Guillaume Klein;Yoon Kim;Yuntian Deng;Jean Senellart

  • Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing

    Thomas Wolf;Lysandre Debut;Victor Sanh;Julien Chaumond

  • BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

    Unknown

  • Abstractive Sentence Summarization with Attentive Recurrent Neural Networks

    Sumit Chopra;Michael Auli;Alexander M. Rush

  • Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation

    Yoon Kim;Alexander M. Rush

  • Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks

    Jason Weston;Antoine Bordes;Sumit Chopra;Alexander M. Rush

  • Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarization

    Sebastian Gehrmann;Yuntian Deng;Alexander M. Rush

  • Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization

    Victor Sanh;Albert Webson;Colin Raffel;Stephen H. Bach

  • Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation

    Sam Joshua Wiseman;Stuart Merrill Shieber;Alexander Sasha Matthew Rush

  • Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimization

    Sam Wiseman;Alexander M. Rush

  • LSTMVis: A Tool for Visual Analysis of Hidden State Dynamics in Recurrent Neural Networks

    Hendrik Strobelt;Sebastian Gehrmann;Hanspeter Pfister;Alexander M. Rush

  • Structured Attention Networks

    Yoon Kim;Carl Denton;Luong Hoang;Alexander M. Rush

  • PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Prompts

    Unknown

  • Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing

    Quentin Lhoest;Albert Villanova del Moral;Yacine Jernite;Abhishek Thakur

  • Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models

    Joe Davison;Joshua Feldman;Alexander M. Rush

  • On Dual Decomposition and Linear Programming Relaxations for Natural Language Processing

    Alexander M Rush;David Sontag;Michael Collins;Tommi Jaakkola

  • GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text

    Sebastian Gehrmann;Hendrik Strobelt;Alexander M. Rush

  • Adversarially Regularized Autoencoders

    Junbo Jake Zhao;Junbo Jake Zhao;Yoon Kim;Kelly Zhang;Alexander M. Rush

  • How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth

    Teven Le Scao;Alexander M. Rush

  • Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models

    Joshua Feldman;Joe Davison;Alexander M. Rush

  • Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning

    Victor Sanh;Thomas Wolf;Alexander M. Rush

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart M. Shieber
Stuart M. Shieber Harvard University
Hendrik Strobelt
Hendrik Strobelt IBM (United States)
David Brooks
David Brooks Harvard University
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Michael Collins
Michael Collins Google (United States)
Sumit Chopra
Sumit Chopra New York University
Jason Weston
Jason Weston Facebook (United States)
Gu-Yeon Wei
Gu-Yeon Wei Harvard University
Claire Cardie
Claire Cardie Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career options. Many students combine their core studies with degrees in STEM fields, allowing for flexibility and broader job prospects.

If you’re interested in areas that complement computer science, consider online physics degrees. These programs provide a strong analytical background, valuable in tech-driven industries. Data science is another popular choice, especially for those keen on big data and AI—explore the data science degree options in the USA for affordable pathways to this booming field.

For tech enthusiasts, electrical engineering offers hands-on skills that align closely with computing. Check the top online electrical engineering schools for programs that can boost your resume.

Not all pathways require years of study—there are also easy certifications to get that pay well, perfect for quickly entering tech roles or upskilling while you study.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander M. Rush

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles