World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 42 8142 7913 3487 3357 102 18295

Michael Collins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Collins between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Collins published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 5 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1970 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Collins: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 5
1987 3
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 0
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 3
1998 6
1999 7
2000 3
2001 7
2002 4
2003 5
2004 5
2005 10
2006 4
2007 6
2008 5
2009 9
2010 7
2011 8
2012 10
2013 4
2014 15
2015 10
2016 9
2017 3
2018 4
2019 13
2020 7
2021 3
2022 2
2023 3
2024 2
2025 3
Total 211
Download as CSV

Michael Collins publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 102 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 102
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Collins D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 42
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Collins is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States, whose work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their publications focus on various specialized areas including Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The main topics that characterize their research include:

  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Ubiquitin and Proteasome Pathways
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances

Michael Collins has contributed to multiple publication venues with notable frequency. These include:

  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Journal of Consumer Affairs
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Advances in Neurotoxicology

Selected recent papers by Michael Collins feature the following titles:

  • "Moderate blood alcohol and brain neurovulnerability: Selective depletion of calcium-independent phospholipase A2, omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid, and its synaptamide derivative as a potential harbinger of deficits in anti-inflammatory reserve," published in 2021 in Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • "A haploinsufficiency restoration strategy corrects neurobehavioral deficits in Nf1+/- mice," 2025, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "510: Humidity and drying time affect dispersion of bacteria from disposable home nebulizers," 2021, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • "Issue Information," 2021, Journal of Consumer Affairs
  • "Issue Information," 2022, Journal of Consumer Affairs

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with several researchers, such as:

  • Julie Aitken Harris
  • Ronald Paul Hill
  • Natalie Ross Adkins
  • Kathryn J. Aikin
  • Craig Andrews

Best Publications

  • Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms

    Michael Collins

  • Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing

    Michael Collins

  • Natural Questions: A Benchmark for Question Answering Research

    Tom Kwiatkowski;Jennimaria Palomaki;Olivia Redfield;Michael Collins

  • Unsupervised Models for Named Entity Classification

    Michael Collins;Yoram Singer

  • Learning to map sentences to logical form: structured classification with probabilistic categorial grammars

    Luke S. Zettlemoyer;Michael Collins

  • Convolution Kernels for Natural Language

    Michael Collins;Nigel Duffy

  • Hidden Conditional Random Fields

    A. Quattoni;S. Wang;L.-P. Morency;M. Collins

  • Three Generative, Lexicalised Models for Statistical Parsing

    Michael Collins

  • Logistic Regression, AdaBoost and Bregman Distances

    Michael Collins;Robert E. Schapire;Yoram Singer

  • Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing

    Michael Collins;Terry Koo

  • A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies

    Michael John Collins

  • Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language Parsing

    Michael Collins

  • Clause Restructuring for Statistical Machine Translation

    Michael Collins;Philipp Koehn;Ivona Kucerova

  • New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron

    Michael Collins;Nigel Duffy

  • Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networks

    Daniel Andor;Chris Alberti;David Weiss;Aliaksei Severyn

  • A Generalization of Principal Components Analysis to the Exponential Family

    Michael Collins;S. Dasgupta;Robert E Schapire

  • Simple Semi-supervised Dependency Parsing

    Terry Koo;Xavier Carreras;Michael Collins

  • BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions

    Christopher Clark;Kenton Lee;Ming-Wei Chang;Tom Kwiatkowski

  • Conditional Random Fields for Object Recognition

    Ariadna Quattoni;Michael Collins;Trevor Darrell

  • Incremental Parsing with the Perceptron Algorithm

    Michael Collins;Brian Roark

  • TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages

    Jonathan H. Clark;Eunsol Choi;Michael Collins;Dan Garrette

  • Ranking Algorithms for Named Entity Extraction: Boosting and the VotedPerceptron

    Michael Collins

  • Transfer learning for image classification with sparse prototype representations

    A. Quattoni;M. Collins;T. Darrell

  • A Statistical Parser for Czech

    Michael Collins;Jan Hajic;Lance Ramshaw;Christoph Tillmann

  • Efficient Third-Order Dependency Parsers

    Terry Koo;Michael Collins

  • Prepositional Phrase Attachment Through a Backed-off Model

    Michael Collins;James Brooks

  • Structured Training for Neural Network Transition-Based Parsing

    David Weiss;Chris Alberti;Michael Collins;Slav Petrov

  • Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistency

    Chris Alberti;Daniel Andor;Emily Pitler;Jacob Devlin

  • Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval

    Yi Luan;Jacob Eisenstein;Kristina Toutanova;Michael Collins

  • Discriminative n-gram language modeling

    Brian Roark;Murat Saraclar;Michael Collins

  • An efficient projection for l1, ∞ regularization

    Ariadna Quattoni;Xavier Carreras;Michael Collins;Trevor Darrell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Shay B. Cohen
Shay B. Cohen University of Edinburgh
Alexander M. Rush
Alexander M. Rush Cornell University
Trevor Darrell
Trevor Darrell University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As computer science continues to evolve, students are seeking flexible and efficient ways to launch their tech careers. Many prospective learners are exploring the fastest online degree options, which can help you enter the workforce sooner without compromising education quality.

For those drawn to the cutting edge of technology, there are now a range of the best online ai degree programs to consider. These programs offer rigorous training in artificial intelligence and machine learning, fields that are in high demand and poised for significant growth.

Choosing the right specialization matters. If you’re thinking ahead, review the best degrees for the future to ensure your qualifications remain relevant as the job market shifts.

Finally, for graduates looking to further their education online, there are a number of easy masters programs to get into. These can help you build on your skills without overwhelming admission requirements, making advanced study more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles