World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
16026
World Ranking
4453
National Ranking
377

Matthew E. Larkum publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew E. Larkum sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 134 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthew E. Larkum D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew E. Larkum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew E. Larkum is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant body of work contributing to both cognitive neuroscience and cellular and molecular neuroscience. They also engage with topics related to social psychology, biophysics, and biomedical engineering.

The main fields of study covered by Larkum's publications include:

  • Neuroscience

Within these broader categories, the subfields of study include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research addresses a variety of topics, highlighting areas such as:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research

Larkum has contributed multiple publications to leading scientific venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Science
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Trends in Neurosciences

Their recent scholarly articles exemplify their research interests and are as follows:

  • Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons, 2020, Science
  • General Anesthesia Decouples Cortical Pyramidal Neurons, 2020, Cell
  • Cellular Mechanisms of Conscious Processing, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Active dendritic currents gate descending cortical outputs in perception, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Perirhinal input to neocortical layer 1 controls learning, 2020, Science

Their collaborations span multiple researchers with repeated joint publications, including:

  • Robert N. S. Sachdev
  • Jaan Aru
  • Timothy A. Zolnik
  • Albert Gidon
  • Mototaka Suzuki

Best Publications

  • A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers.

    Matthew E. Larkum;J. Julius Zhu;Bert Sakmann

  • A cellular mechanism for cortical associations: an organizing principle for the cerebral cortex.

    Matthew Larkum

  • Synaptic integration in tuft dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a new unifying principle.

    Matthew E. Larkum;Thomas Nevian;Maya Sandler;Alon Polsky

  • Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons.

    Albert Gidon;Timothy Adam Zolnik;Pawel Fidzinski;Felix Bolduan

  • Active Properties of Neocortical Pyramidal Neuron Dendrites

    Guy Major;Matthew E. Larkum;Jackie Schiller

  • Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential initiation zone of adult rat layer 5 pyramidal neurons

    Matthew E. Larkum;J. Julius Zhu;Bert Sakmann

  • Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a direct patch-clamp recording study.

    Thomas Nevian;Matthew E Larkum;Alon Polsky;Jackie Schiller

  • Active cortical dendrites modulate perception.

    Naoya Takahashi;Thomas G. Oertner;Peter Hegemann;Matthew E. Larkum

  • Dendritic encoding of sensory stimuli controlled by deep cortical interneurons

    Masanori Murayama;Enrique Pérez-Garci;Thomas Nevian;Tobias Bock

  • Top-down Dendritic Input Increases the Gain of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons

    Matthew E. Larkum;Walter Senn;Hans-R. Lüscher

  • A Top-Down Cortical Circuit for Accurate Sensory Perception.

    Satoshi Manita;Takayuki Suzuki;Chihiro Homma;Takashi Matsumoto

  • NMDA spikes enhance action potential generation during sensory input

    Lucy M Palmer;Adam S Shai;James E Reeve;Harry L Anderson

  • Calcium electrogenesis in distal apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells at a critical frequency of back-propagating action potentials

    Matthew E. Larkum;Katharina Kaiser;Bert Sakmann

  • High I h Channel Density in the Distal Apical Dendrite of Layer V Pyramidal Cells Increases Bidirectional Attenuation of EPSPs

    Thomas Berger;Matthew E. Larkum;Hans R. Lüscher

  • Coincidence detection in pyramidal neurons is tuned by their dendritic branching pattern.

    Andreas T. Schaefer;Matthew E. Larkum;Bert Sakmann;Arnd Roth

  • The cellular basis of gabab-mediated interhemispheric inhibition

    Lucy M. Palmer;Jan M. Schulz;Sean C. Murphy;Debora Ledergerber

  • The GABAB1b isoform mediates long-lasting inhibition of dendritic Ca2+ spikes in layer 5 somatosensory pyramidal neurons.

    Enrique Pérez-Garci;Martin Gassmann;Bernhard Bettler;Matthew E. Larkum

  • Synaptic clustering by dendritic signalling mechanisms.

    Matthew E Larkum;Thomas Nevian

  • General Anesthesia Decouples Cortical Pyramidal Neurons.

    Mototaka Suzuki;Matthew E. Larkum

  • Cellular Mechanisms of Conscious Processing.

    Jaan Aru;Jaan Aru;Mototaka Suzuki;Matthew E. Larkum;Matthew E. Larkum

  • Signaling of layer 1 and whisker-evoked Ca2+ and Na+ action potentials in distal and terminal dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro and in vivo

    Matthew E. Larkum;J. Julius Zhu

  • Functional fluorescent Ca2+ indicator proteins in transgenic mice under TET control.

    Mazahir T Hasan;Rainer W Friedrich;Thomas Euler;Matthew E Larkum

Frequent Co-Authors

Bert Sakmann
Bert Sakmann Max Planck Society
Michael Brecht
Michael Brecht Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Fritjof Helmchen
Fritjof Helmchen University of Zurich
Walter Senn
Walter Senn University of Bern
Takeharu Nagai
Takeharu Nagai Osaka University
Valery Grinevich
Valery Grinevich Heidelberg University
William N. Ross
William N. Ross New York Medical College
Michael Häusser
Michael Häusser University College London
Hans-Rudolf Lüscher
Hans-Rudolf Lüscher University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthew E. Larkum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles