World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5155 4937 90 90 154 12644

Frank Raes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank Raes between 1980 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank Raes published across 38 years, from 1980 to 2017, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2000. 1 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2000. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1980 2017

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank Raes: publications per year, 1980 to 2017
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 3
1985 6
1986 7
1987 4
1988 6
1989 1
1990 4
1991 4
1992 5
1993 6
1994 2
1995 6
1996 3
1997 4
1998 7
1999 4
2000 12
2001 3
2002 9
2003 7
2004 6
2005 5
2006 1
2007 7
2008 5
2009 10
2010 5
2011 1
2012 3
2013 3
2014 3
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Frank Raes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Raes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 154
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank Raes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Raes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank Raes is affiliated with Bocconi University in Italy and conducts research primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their scholarly work focuses on subfields related to Health, Toxicology, and Mutagenesis, with a particular emphasis on the intersection of climate change and health impacts.

The scientist has contributed to the topic of Climate Change and Health Impacts through multiple research efforts. This focus highlights the environmental and public health consequences of climate-related factors.

Among their recent papers is one titled "Global Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls," published in 2020 in the UNC Libraries. This publication addresses the potential health benefits associated with reducing specific short-lived climate pollutants.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Susan C. Anenberg
  • Joel Schwartz
  • Drew Shindell
  • Markus Amann
  • G. Faluvegi

Frank Raes has published in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security

    Drew Shindell;Johan C. I. Kuylenstierna;Elisabetta Vignati;Rita van Dingenen

  • A European aerosol phenomenology—1: physical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe

    Rita Van Dingenen;Frank Raes;Jean-P Putaud;Urs Baltensperger

  • A European aerosol phenomenology 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe

    J.-P. Putaud;R. Van Dingenen;A. Alastuey;H. Bauer

  • The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation

    Rita Van Dingenen;Frank J. Dentener;Frank Raes;Maarten C. Krol

  • Formation and cycling of aerosols in the global troposphere

    Frank Raes;Rita Van Dingenen;Elisabetta Vignati;Julian Wilson

  • Global Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls

    Susan C. Anenberg;Joel Schwartz;Drew Todd Shindell;Markus Amann

  • The 2nd Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE‐2): general overview and main results

    Frank Raes;Timothy Bates;Frank McGovern;Marc Van Liedekerke

  • Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer

    Frank Raes

  • Impacts of Europe's changing climate – 2008 indicator based assessment

    Unknown

  • Atmospheric Composition Change: Climate-Chemistry Interactions

    I.S.A. Isaksen;C. Granier;C. Granier;G. Myhre;T. Berntsen

  • The Impact of Air Pollutant and Methane Emission Controls on Tropospheric Ozone and Radiative Forcing: CTM Calculations for the Period 1990-2030

    F. Dentener;David Stevenson;J. Cofala;R. Mechler

  • Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies?

    Rob Swart;Frank Raes

  • Chemical mass closure and assessment of the origin of the submicron aerosol in the marine boundary layer and the free troposphere at Tenerife during ACE-2

    J.-P. Putaud;R. Van Dingenen;M. Mangoni;A. Virkkula

  • Size-segregated aerosol mass closure and chemical composition in Monte Cimone (I) during MINATROC

    J.-P. Putaud;R. Van Dingenen;A. Dell'Acqua;F. Raes

  • Hygroscopic properties of aerosol formed by oxidation of limonene, α‐pinene, and β‐pinene

    Aki Virkkula;Rita Van Dingenen;Frank Raes;Jens Hjorth

  • An incentive mechanism for reducing emissions from conversion of intact and non-intact forests

    Danilo Mollicone;Frederic Achard;Sandro Federici;Hugh D. Eva

  • Formation of HNO2 on aerosol surfaces during foggy periods in the presence of NO and NO2

    Justus Notholt;J. Hjorth;F. Raes

  • Observations of aerosols in the free troposphere and marine boundary layer of the subtropical Northeast Atlantic: Discussion of processes determining their size distribution

    Frank Raes;Rita Van Dingenen;Emilio Cuevas;Peter F. J. Van Velthoven

  • A modeling study of global mixed aerosol fields

    Julian Wilson;Cornelis Cuvelier;Frank Raes

  • Simulations of condensation and cloud condensation nuclei from biogenic SO2 in the remote marine boundary layer

    Frank Raes;Rita Van Dingenen

  • A European aerosol phenomenology-3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe

    J. P. Putaud;R. Van Dingenen;A. Alastuey;H. Bauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Rita Van Dingenen
Rita Van Dingenen Ghent University
Elisabetta Vignati
Elisabetta Vignati Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change
Sandro Fuzzi
Sandro Fuzzi Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
Jean-Philippe Putaud
Jean-Philippe Putaud European Commission Joint Research Centre
Willy Maenhaut
Willy Maenhaut Ghent University
Luc Feyen
Luc Feyen Stanford University
Aki Virkkula
Aki Virkkula Finnish Meteorological Institute
Alessandro Dosio
Alessandro Dosio Joint Research Centre
Johann Feichter
Johann Feichter Max Planck Society
Silvia Kloster
Silvia Kloster Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences often opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, exploring programs like the cheapest dsw program can offer advanced skills in social work to tackle community and environmental challenges.

Students looking for flexible options might consider online general studies degrees. Programs such as the cheapest online general studies degree programs provide a broad educational foundation that can be customized to include environmental topics, making it easier to align academic goals with career ambitions.

For those concerned about workload intensity, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in selecting a program that balances academic rigor with career readiness. This is especially helpful for students balancing studies with other commitments.

Specifically focused on Earth sciences, an online geologist degree online prepares students for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation. This path blends scientific knowledge with practical skills crucial for addressing global environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Raes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles