World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
11952
World Ranking
2963
National Ranking
51

Ohad Shamir publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ohad Shamir sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ohad Shamir D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ohad Shamir sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ohad Shamir is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, focusing primarily on research in computer science. Their scholarly work spans main fields and subfields, emphasizing areas linked to artificial intelligence and computational methodologies.

Their research contributions cover the following main fields of study:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, their subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Shamir's work encompasses a range of topics, with significant focus on optimization and machine learning methods:

  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Machine Learning and ELM (Extreme Learning Machines)
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

The scientist has contributed numerous papers to various venues, frequently publishing in arXiv (Cornell University). Other venues include Constructive Approximation, the Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, The Annals of Statistics, and the International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Need," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networks," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Learning a Single Neuron with Gradient Methods," 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The Min-Max Complexity of Distributed Stochastic Convex Optimization with Intermittent Communication," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Shamir frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Gilad Yehudai
  • Gal Vardi
  • Guy Kornowski
  • Nathan Srebro
  • Itay Safran

Best Publications

  • Optimal distributed online prediction using mini-batches

    Ofer Dekel;Ran Gilad-Bachrach;Ohad Shamir;Lin Xiao

  • The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networks

    Ronen Eldan;Ohad Shamir

  • Making Gradient Descent Optimal for Strongly Convex Stochastic Optimization

    Alexander Rakhlin;Ohad Shamir;Karthik Sridharan

  • Stochastic Gradient Descent for Non-smooth Optimization: Convergence Results and Optimal Averaging Schemes

    Ohad Shamir;Tong Zhang

  • Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization using an Approximate Newton-type Method

    Ohad Shamir;Nati Srebro;Tong Zhang

  • Learnability, Stability and Uniform Convergence

    Shai Shalev-Shwartz;Ohad Shamir;Nathan Srebro;Karthik Sridharan

  • Size-independent sample complexity of neural networks

    Noah Golowich;Alexander Rakhlin;Ohad Shamir

  • Stochastic Convex Optimization.

    Shai Shalev-Shwartz;Ohad Shamir;Nathan Srebro;Karthik Sridharan

  • On the Computational Efficiency of Training Neural Networks

    Roi Livni;Shai Shalev-Shwartz;Ohad Shamir

  • Learning and generalization with the information bottleneck

    Ohad Shamir;Sivan Sabato;Naftali Tishby

  • An Optimal Algorithm for Bandit and Zero-Order Convex Optimization with Two-Point Feedback

    Ohad Shamir

  • Adaptively Learning the Crowd Kernel

    Omer Tamuz;Ce Liu;Serge Belongie;Ohad Shamir

  • Learning to classify with missing and corrupted features

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir;Lin Xiao

  • Better Mini-Batch Algorithms via Accelerated Gradient Methods

    Andrew Cotter;Ohad Shamir;Nati Srebro;Karthik Sridharan

  • Spurious Local Minima are Common in Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks.

    Itay Safran;Ohad Shamir

  • Distributed stochastic optimization and learning

    Ohad Shamir;Nathan Srebro

  • Vox Populi: Collecting High-Quality Labels from a Crowd

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir

  • A Stochastic PCA and SVD Algorithm with an Exponential Convergence Rate

    Ohad Shamir

  • On the Complexity of Bandit and Derivative-Free Stochastic Convex Optimization

    Ohad Shamir

  • Multi-player bandits: a musical chairs approach

    Jonathan Rosenski;Ohad Shamir;Liran Szlak

  • Communication complexity of distributed convex learning and optimization

    Yossi Arjevani;Ohad Shamir

  • Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD

    Blake Woodworth;Kumar Kshitij Patel;Sebastian Stich;Zhen Dai

  • Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learning

    Shai Shalev-Shwartz;Ohad Shamir;Shaked Shammah

  • Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Need

    Gilad Yehudai;Eran Malach;Shai Shalev-Schwartz;Ohad Shamir

Frequent Co-Authors

Shai Shalev-Shwartz
Shai Shalev-Shwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi University of Milan
Karthik Sridharan
Karthik Sridharan Cornell University
Nathan Srebro
Nathan Srebro Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Ofer Dekel
Ofer Dekel Microsoft (United States)
Naftali Tishby
Naftali Tishby Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shie Mannor
Shie Mannor Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Adam Tauman Kalai
Adam Tauman Kalai Microsoft (United States)
Lin Xiao
Lin Xiao Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree pathways. With the fast pace of today’s world, more students are choosing flexible options such as associates degrees online. These programs can fast-track entry into tech fields or serve as a stepping stone to bachelor’s degrees.

For students mindful of costs, finding the cheapest online business degree or exploring affordable online colleges is essential. These options enable learners to gain sought-after skills in areas such as management, entrepreneurship, and computer science, all while reducing student debt.

Another pathway for tech-focused students is earning an engineering online degree. These credentials lay the foundation for careers in software, hardware, and emerging tech fields. In summary, affordable and flexible online programs offer accessible routes for launching or advancing technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ohad Shamir

Trending Scientists