World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel L. Van Dyke

Daniel L. Van Dyke

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
9771
World Ranking
15696
National Ranking
6541

Daniel L. Van Dyke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Van Dyke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 261 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Daniel L. Van Dyke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Van Dyke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel L. Van Dyke is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly in genetics, pathology and forensic medicine, immunology, molecular biology, and hematology. Their research spans multiple aspects of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and related hematological conditions.

The scientist has published notable work in the area of chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, lymphomas, immunodeficiency, and autoimmune disorders. Their primary research topics include:

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

Frequent publication venues for Daniel L. Van Dyke include:

  • Blood
  • Blood Cancer Journal
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • Cancer Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Collaborations feature prominently in their work. Key coauthors who have frequently contributed alongside Daniel L. Van Dyke are:

  • Neil E. Kay
  • Sameer A. Parikh
  • Susan L. Slager
  • Yucai Wang
  • Kari G. Rabe

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on CLL and related immune conditions. Examples of these publications include:

  • "CLL update 2022: A continuing evolution in care" (2022) published in Blood Reviews
  • "The role of 18F-FDG-PET in detecting Richter's transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in patients receiving therapy with a B-cell receptor inhibitor" (2020) in Haematologica
  • "Disease Flare During Temporary Interruption of Ibrutinib Therapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia" (2020) in The Oncologist
  • "Distinct immune signatures in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter syndrome" (2021) in Blood Cancer Journal
  • "Defining clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma in routine clinical practice" (2020) in Histopathology

Daniel L. Van Dyke's body of work is aligned with ongoing research efforts in hematology and oncology, with an emphasis on advancing understanding of CLL and related malignancies through genetic and immunological approaches.

Best Publications

  • DIPSS Plus: A Refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis That Incorporates Prognostic Information From Karyotype, Platelet Count, and Transfusion Status

    Naseema Gangat;Domenica Caramazza;Rakhee Vaidya;Geeta George

  • Pembrolizumab in patients with CLL and Richter transformation or with relapsed CLL

    Wei Ding;Betsy R. LaPlant;Timothy G. Call;Sameer A. Parikh

  • Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region

    Daniel L. Van Dyke;Maria J. Worsham;Timothy Drumheller;Michael S. Benninger

  • RARE TRISOMY MOSAICISM DIAGNOSED IN AMNIOCYTES, INVOLVING AN AUTOSOME OTHER THAN CHROMOSOMES 13, 18, 20, AND 21: KARYOTYPE/PHENOTYPE CORRELATIONS

    Lillian Y.F. Hsu;Ming Tsung Yu;Richard L. Neu;Daniel L. Van Dyke

  • Evidence for a Turner Syndrome Locus or Loci at Xp11.2-p22.1

    Andrew R. Zinn;Vijay S. Tonk;Zhong Chen;Zhong Chen;Wendy L. Flejter

  • Clinical significance of Y chromosome loss in hematologic disease.

    Anne Wiktor;Benjamin A. Rybicki;Zhe Si Piao;Muhammad Shurafa

  • De novo deletion 17p13.1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia shows significant clinical heterogeneity: the M. D. Anderson and Mayo Clinic experience

    Constantine S. Tam;Constantine S. Tam;Tait D. Shanafelt;William G. Wierda;Lynne V. Abruzzo

  • Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in intrauterine fetal death.

    Lia Crotti;David J. Tester;Wendy M. White;Daniel C. Bartos

  • Characterization of Neo-Centromeres in Marker Chromosomes Lacking Detectable Alpha-satellite DNA

    Theresa W. Depinet;Joleen L. Zackowski;William C. Earnshaw;Sara Kaffe

  • Relationship of patient survival and chromosome anomalies detected in metaphase and/or interphase cells at diagnosis of myeloma.

    Gordon W. Dewald;Terry Therneau;Dirk Larson;You Kyoung Lee

  • Laboratory guideline for Turner syndrome.

    Daynna J. Wolff;Daniel L. Van Dyke;Cynthia M. Powell

  • The Spreading of X Inactivation into Autosomal Material of an X;autosome Translocation: Evidence for a Difference between Autosomal and X-Chromosomal DNA

    Wendy M. White;Huntington F. Willard;Daniel L. Van Dyke;Daynna J. Wolff

  • International Prognostic Scoring System–independent cytogenetic risk categorization in primary myelofibrosis

    Kebede Hussein;Animesh D. Pardanani;Daniel L. Van Dyke;Curtis A. Hanson

  • Methylprednisolone-rituximab is an effective salvage therapy for patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia including those with unfavorable cytogenetic features

    Deborah A. Bowen;Timothy G. Call;Greg D. Jenkins;Clive S. Zent

  • INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM INVOLVING AN AUTOSOMAL STRUCTURAL ABNORMALITY DIAGNOSED PRENATALLY THROUGH AMNIOCENTESIS: A COLLABORATIVE STUDY

    Lillian Y.F. Hsu;Ming Tsung Yu;Kathleen E. Richkind;Daniel L. Van Dyke

  • Common clonal origin of synchronous primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Analysis by tumor karyotypes and fluorescence in situ hybridization

    Maria J Worsham;Maria J Worsham;Sandra R Wolman;Sandra R Wolman;Thomas E Carey;Thomas E Carey;Richard J Zarbo;Richard J Zarbo

  • Conventional cytogenetics in myelofibrosis: literature review and discussion.

    Kebede Hussein;Daniel L. Van Dyke;Ayalew Tefferi

  • Preclinical validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization assays for clinical practice

    Anne E Wiktor;Daniel L Van Dyke;Peggy J Stupca;Rhett P Ketterling

  • A comprehensive evaluation of the prognostic significance of 13q deletions in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

    Daniel L. Van Dyke;Tait D. Shanafelt;Timothy G. Call;Clive S. Zent

  • Loss of 18q predicts poor survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

    Richard P. Pearlstein;Michael S. Benninger;Thomas E. Carey;Richard J. Zarbo

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil E. Kay
Neil E. Kay Mayo Clinic
Curtis A. Hanson
Curtis A. Hanson Mayo Clinic
Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University
Susan L. Slager
Susan L. Slager Mayo Clinic
Kari G. Rabe
Kari G. Rabe Mayo Clinic
Ayalew Tefferi
Ayalew Tefferi Mayo Clinic
Gordon W. Dewald
Gordon W. Dewald Mayo Clinic
Thomas E. Carey
Thomas E. Carey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse online degree and career options in the health and life sciences fields. For those aiming to advance into leadership roles, the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs can equip professionals with advanced management and policy-making skills, preparing graduates for top roles in healthcare organizations.

If your interests center on pharmaceuticals, online pharmd programs for non pharmacists offer a flexible path to a high-demand credential, even for those without a pharmacy background. These programs blend scientific coursework with practical pharmaceutical training.

For students passionate about fitness, health promotion, or athletic performance, a sports science degree online explores anatomy, physiology, and movement science—foundations for careers in athletic training, wellness coaching, and exercise physiology.

Similarly, an accelerated kinesiology degree online enables quick entry into growing fields like rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and health education.

Exploring these online programs can help you expand your knowledge, boost your credentials, and tailor your career in the vibrant and evolving world of biology, biochemistry, and related health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Van Dyke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles