World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
6879
World Ranking
13869
National Ranking
5512

Ofer Dekel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofer Dekel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 54 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ofer Dekel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofer Dekel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ofer Dekel is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research profile does not currently list recent publications, specific fields, or subfields of study, but their professional affiliation suggests involvement in technological or computational research sectors.

No frequent co-authors or publication venues have been identified, which may indicate a relatively focused or emerging research trajectory, or limited publicly available bibliographic data. There are no known book publications attributed to them.

The absence of recorded awards or honors suggests that recognition in the form of prizes has either not been documented or is yet to be attained within available metadata.

Ofer Dekel's available data does not specify primary research topics or thematic areas of work, restricting detailed insight into their scientific interests based on current records.

Best Publications

  • Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms

    Koby Crammer;Koby Crammer;Ofer Dekel;Joseph Keshet;Shai Shalev-Shwartz

  • Optimal distributed online prediction using mini-batches

    Ofer Dekel;Ran Gilad-Bachrach;Ohad Shamir;Lin Xiao

  • Optimal Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Multi-Point Bandit Feedback.

    Alekh Agarwal;Ofer Dekel;Lin Xiao

  • Large margin hierarchical classification

    Ofer Dekel;Joseph Keshet;Yoram Singer

  • Incentive compatible regression learning

    Ofer Dekel;Felix Fischer;Ariel D. Procaccia

  • Log-Linear Models for Label Ranking

    Ofer Dekel;Yoram Singer;Christopher D Manning

  • The Forgetron: A Kernel-Based Perceptron on a Budget

    Ofer Dekel;Shai Shalev-Shwartz;Yoram Singer

  • Adaptive neural networks for efficient inference

    Tolga Bolukbasi;Joseph Wang;Ofer Dekel;Venkatesh Saligrama

  • Learning to classify with missing and corrupted features

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir;Lin Xiao

  • Vox Populi: Collecting High-Quality Labels from a Crowd

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir

  • Online Bandit Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: from Regret to Policy Regret

    Raman Arora;Ofer Dekel;Ambuj Tewari

  • The Forgetron: A Kernel-Based Perceptron on a Fixed Budget

    Ofer Dekel;Shai Shalev-shwartz;Yoram Singer

  • Good learners for evil teachers

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir

  • Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Bandits

    Noga Alon;Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi;Ofer Dekel;Tomer Koren

  • Selective sampling and active learning from single and multiple teachers

    Ofer Dekel;Claudio Gentile;Karthik Sridharan

  • Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms

    Shai Shalev-shwartz;Koby Crammer;Ofer Dekel;Yoram Singer

  • Online multitask learning

    Ofer Dekel;Philip M. Long;Yoram Singer

  • Bandits with switching costs: T 2/3 regret

    Ofer Dekel;Jian Ding;Tomer Koren;Yuval Peres

  • An online algorithm for hierarchical phoneme classification

    Ofer Dekel;Joseph Keshet;Yoram Singer

  • Online Learning of Multiple Tasks with a Shared Loss

    Ofer Dekel;Philip M. Long;Yoram Singer

  • Learning to classify with missing and corrupted features

    Ofer Dekel;Ohad Shamir

  • Robust Selective Sampling from Single and Multiple Teachers.

    Ofer Dekel;Claudio Gentile;Karthik Sridharan

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoram Singer
Yoram Singer Princeton University
Ohad Shamir
Ohad Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Lin Xiao
Lin Xiao Facebook (United States)
Shai Shalev-Shwartz
Shai Shalev-Shwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ariel D. Procaccia
Ariel D. Procaccia Harvard University
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi University of Milan
Ambuj Tewari
Ambuj Tewari University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Koby Crammer
Koby Crammer Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Venkatesh Saligrama
Venkatesh Saligrama Boston University
Sébastien Bubeck
Sébastien Bubeck Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of related online degrees and flexible career pathways. For students looking for versatile options, interdisciplinary fields like data science, engineering, and physics offer compelling alternatives.

Consider pursuing an environmental engineering degree online if you are interested in the intersection of technology, sustainability, and environmental science. Similarly, learning how to manage costs is crucial, and you can find insights on mechanical engineering degree cost when planning your studies in engineering.

For those passionate about scientific discovery, a growing number of online physics degrees make advanced science education more accessible than ever, even from a distance.

Finally, as data-driven roles continue to expand, students should look into how to find an affordable data science degree to prepare for high-demand careers in tech, analytics, and research.

Each of these online degree options can open doors to exciting, in-demand career paths in today's digital and tech-driven economy.

Best Scientists Citing Ofer Dekel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles