World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7676 7162 4106 3729 70 37814

Jeffrey C. Valentine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey C. Valentine between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey C. Valentine published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 8 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2000. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
1967 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey C. Valentine: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 10
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 1
2015 4
2016 5
2017 10
2018 1
2019 4
2020 2
2021 0
2022 1
2023 4
2024 2
2025 6
Total 95
Download as CSV

Jeffrey C. Valentine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Valentine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 70
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey C. Valentine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Valentine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey C. Valentine is affiliated with the University of Louisville in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and social sciences. Their work primarily focuses on meta-analysis and systematic reviews, with additional interest in the Delphi technique in research and advanced causal inference methods.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist" (2020, BMJ)
  • "Can Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions Provide Unbiased Effect Estimates? A Systematic Review of Internal Replication Studies" (2022, Evaluation Review)
  • "A Primer on Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: the Case of Depression" (2021, Prevention Science)
  • "PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews" (2023, Campbell Systematic Reviews)
  • "Editorial: Fifty Campbell systematic reviews relevant to the policy response to COVID-19" (2020, Campbell Systematic Reviews)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Terri Pigott
  • Peter Tugwell
  • Vivian Welch
  • Zulfiqar A Bhutta
  • Elizabeth Kristjansson

Valentine's work has appeared multiple times in these publication venues:

  • Campbell Systematic Reviews
  • BMJ
  • Evaluation Review
  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

The main fields of study covered in Valentine's research are:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Their research further delves into several subfields, including:

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Applied Psychology

Valentine's primary research topics comprise:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Best Publications

  • ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

    Jonathan A. C. Sterne;Miguel A Hernan;Barnaby C Reeves;Jelena Savovic;Jelena Savovic

  • The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

    Harris Cooper;Larry V. Hedges;Jeffrey C. Valentine

  • Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review.

    David L. DuBois;Bruce E. Holloway;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Harris Cooper

  • The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    Jeffrey C. Valentine;David L. DuBois;Harris Cooper

  • Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination

    Brian R Flay;Anthony Biglan;Robert F Boruch;Felipe González Castro

  • How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis

    Jeffrey C. Valentine;Therese D. Pigott;Hannah R. Rothstein

  • How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence

    David L. DuBois;Nelson Portillo;Jean E. Rhodes;Naida Silverthorn

  • How Many Studies Do You Need? A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis

    Jeffrey C. Valentine;Therese D. Pigott;Hannah R. Rothstein

  • Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review.

    B. Ann Bettencourt;Amelia Talley;Arlin James Benjamin;Jeffrey Valentine

  • Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement.

    Harris Cooper;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Barbara Nye;James J. Lindsay

  • The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd ed.

    Harris Cooper;Larry Vernon Hedges;Jeffrey C. Valentine

  • Making the Most of Summer School: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review

    Harris Cooper;Kelly Charlton;Jeff C. Valentine;Laura Muhlenbruck

  • Using Research to Answer Practical Questions About Homework

    Harris Cooper;Jeffrey C. Valentine

  • Violent video games: Specific effects of violent content on aggressive thoughts and behavior

    Craig A. Anderson;Nicholas L. Carnagey;Mindy Flanagan;Arlin J. Benjamin

  • Grey literature in meta-analyses.

    Vicki S. Conn;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Harris M. Cooper;Marilyn J. Rantz

  • Research synthesis and meta-analysis

    JC Valentine;HM Cooper

  • Interventions to increase physical activity among aging adults: a meta-analysis.

    Vicki S. Conn;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Harris M. Cooper

  • How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit

    Hugh Waddington;Howard White;Birte Snilstveit;Jorge Garcia Hombrados

  • Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review.

    Jacob B. Nienhuis;Jesse Owen;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Stephanie Winkeljohn Black

  • Research synthesis as a scientific process

    Harris Cooper;Larry Vernon Hedges

  • Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

    Jeffrey C. Valentine;Harris Cooper

  • Methods of Instructional Improvement in Algebra A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Christopher R. Rakes;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Maggie B. McGatha;Robert N. Ronau

  • The Effects of Modified School Calendars on Student Achievement and on School and Community Attitudes

    Harris Cooper;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Kelly Charlton;April Melson

  • Cognitive‐behavioural interventions for children who have been sexually abused

    Geraldine Macdonald;Julian P T Higgins;Paul Ramchandani;Jeffrey C Valentine

Frequent Co-Authors

Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
David Dubois
David Dubois University of Illinois at Chicago
Steven P. Schinke
Steven P. Schinke Columbia University
Sheppard G. Kellam
Sheppard G. Kellam Johns Hopkins University
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Anthony Biglan
Anthony Biglan Oregon Research Institute
Felipe González Castro
Felipe González Castro Arizona State University
Julian P T Higgins
Julian P T Higgins University of Bristol
Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open the door to a wide range of online degree options and specialized career paths. Many students interested in applied psychology look to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), a role with growing demand across the country. If you are considering becoming a BCBA, it’s essential to understand regional requirements and recommended degree pathways that suit your location and career goals.

For example, you can learn more about Fremont bcba education requirements to see what courses and credentials are valued in California. If you’re in Central California, how to become a bcba in Fresno provides insight into area-specific prerequisites. Those living in Texas may find Garland bcba requirements helpful for navigating local certification needs, while Arizona residents can explore becoming a bcba in Gilbert. Exploring these regional guides will help you choose the right program and prepare for your BCBA career, whether you study online or on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey C. Valentine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles