World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
27931
World Ranking
1708
National Ranking
49

Eva Rehfuess publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Rehfuess sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 184 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eva Rehfuess D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Rehfuess sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eva Rehfuess is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with significant focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics of their scholarly work include:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health and Medical Studies
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Eva Rehfuess has published extensively, contributing numerous papers to different research venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Health Research Policy and Systems
  • BMC Public Health

Recent notable papers include:

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance, 2021, BMJ
  • Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses, 2021, Globalization and Health
  • International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review, 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid scoping review, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The scientist frequently collaborates with a core group of co-authors, among whom are:

  • Lisa M. Pfadenhauer
  • Jacob Burns
  • Michaela Coenen
  • Ani Movsisyan
  • Peter von Philipsborn

Best Publications

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

    Harry Rutter;Natalie Savona;Ketevan Glonti;Jo Bibby

  • Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980-2010.

    Sophie Bonjour;Heather Adair-Rohani;Jennyfer Wolf;Nigel G. Bruce

  • Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework

    Lisa M. Pfadenhauer;Ansgar Gerhardus;Kati Mozygemba;Kristin Bakke Lysdahl

  • Millions Dead: How Do We Know and What Does It Mean? Methods Used in the Comparative Risk Assessment of Household Air Pollution

    Kirk R. Smith;Nigel Bruce;Kalpana Balakrishnan;Heather Adair-Rohani

  • Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries

    Daniel P. Pope;Vinod Mishra;Lisa Thompson;Amna Rehana Siddiqui

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.

    Graham Moore;Mhairi Campbell;Lauren Copeland;Peter Craig

  • Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews

    Laurie M. Anderson;Mark Petticrew;Eva Rehfuess;Rebecca Armstrong

  • Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review

    Eva Annette Rehfuess;Elisa Puzzolo;Debbi Stanistreet;Daniel Pope

  • The impact of sanitation on infectious disease and nutritional status: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Matthew C. Freeman;Joshua V. Garn;Gloria D. Sclar;Sophie Boisson

  • Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute

    Mark Petticrew;Eva Rehfuess;Jane Noyes;Julian P T Higgins;Julian P T Higgins

  • Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use.

    Elisa Puzzolo;Daniel Pope;Debbi Stanistreet;Eva A. Rehfuess

  • Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar‐sweetened beverages and their effects on health

    Peter von Philipsborn;Jan M. Stratil;Jacob Burns;Laura K. Busert

  • The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Joshua V. Garn;Gloria D. Sclar;Matthew C. Freeman;Gauthami Penakalapati

  • GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.

    Rebecca L. Morgan;Kristina A. Thayer;Lisa Bero;Nigel Bruce

  • Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance

    Ani Movsisyan;Laura Arnold;Rhiannon Evans;Britt Hallingberg

  • WHO indoor air quality guidelines on household fuel combustion: Strategy implications of new evidence on interventions and exposure–risk functions

    Nigel Bruce;Nigel Bruce;Dan Pope;Eva Rehfuess;Kalpana Balakrishnan

  • Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions

    Julian P T Higgins;José A López-López;Betsy J Becker;Sarah R Davies

  • Real-life effectiveness of ‘improved’ stoves and clean fuels in reducing PM2.5 and CO: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Daniel Pope;Nigel Bruce;Mukesh Dherani;Kirstie Jagoe

  • Mental burden and its risk and protective factors during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analyses.

    Angela M. Kunzler;Angela M. Kunzler;Nikolaus Röthke;Lukas Günthner;Jutta Stoffers-Winterling;Jutta Stoffers-Winterling

  • Urban Environmental Health Hazards and Health Equity

    Tord Kjellstrom;Sharon Friel;Jane Dixon;Carlos Corvalan

  • Understanding child stunting in India: a comprehensive analysis of socio-economic, nutritional and environmental determinants using additive quantile regression.

    Nora Fenske;Jacob Burns;Torsten Hothorn;Eva A. Rehfuess

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Bruce
Nigel Bruce University of Liverpool
Elie A. Akl
Elie A. Akl American University of Beirut
Andrew Booth
Andrew Booth University of Sheffield
Holger J. Schünemann
Holger J. Schünemann Humanitas University
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Mark Petticrew
Mark Petticrew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Bjørn Hofmann
Bjørn Hofmann University of Oslo
Kirk R. Smith
Kirk R. Smith University of California, Berkeley
Vivian Welch
Vivian Welch University of Ottawa
Jamie Bartram
Jamie Bartram University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are a variety of online degrees catering to different interests and career goals. For those fascinated by human behavior, a psychology online degree is an accessible way to launch a career in counseling, research, or mental health services.

Aspiring social workers can look for the easiest msw online program to gain the credentials needed for clinical or advocacy roles without the hurdles of tough admissions. Professionals aiming for advanced clinical practice or leadership in psychology might pursue the online psyd, which prepares graduates for high-level practitioner roles.

If you’re interested in helping couples and families navigate relationship challenges, online mft degrees offer a streamlined path to licensure as a marriage and family therapist. Each pathway leads to rewarding roles in public service, counseling, healthcare, and education, making social sciences a flexible and impactful field to explore.

Best Scientists Citing Eva Rehfuess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles