World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jens Möller

Jens Möller

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10508
World Ranking
4995
National Ranking
230

Jens Möller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Möller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jens Möller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Möller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Möller is affiliated with Kiel University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on educational research. Their work covers a range of topics within education, achievement, and motivation, reflecting a broad interest in how individuals learn and develop in academic contexts.

The main fields of study in which Jens Möller has published include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Their subfields of expertise encompass:

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Jens Möller's research addresses several major topics, such as:

  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Student Assessment and Feedback

Among their recent published papers are:

  • A Meta-Analysis of Relations Between Achievement and Self-Concept, 2020, Review of Educational Research
  • Inclusive Education of Students With General Learning Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis, 2021, Review of Educational Research
  • How Dimensional Comparisons Help to Understand Linkages Between Expectancies, Values, Performance, and Choice, 2020, Educational Psychology Review
  • Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays, 2024, Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
  • Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses., 2022, Psychological Bulletin

Jens Möller often collaborates with a number of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Thorben Jansen
  • Johanna Fleckenstein
  • Nils Machts
  • Stefan Keller
  • Fabian Wolff

The scientist's work has been published in various academic journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • Learning and Instruction
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Learning and Individual Differences
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie

Best Publications

  • Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence.

    Ulrich Schiefele;Ellen Schaffner;Jens Möller;Allan Wigfield

  • Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis

    Anna Südkamp;Johanna Kaiser;Jens Möller

  • A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Academic Achievement and Academic Self-Concept

    Jens Moller;Britta Pohlmann;Olaf Koller;Herbert Warren Marsh

  • Dimensional comparison theory.

    J. Moller;Herbert Warren Marsh

  • On the Effects of Motivation on Reading Performance Growth in Secondary School.

    Jan Retelsdorf;Olaf Köller;Jens Möller

  • The Reciprocal Internal/External Frame of Reference Model An Integration of Models of Relations Between Academic Achievement and Self-Concept

    Jens Moller;Jan Retelsdorf;Olaf Koller;Herbert W Marsh

  • Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte

    Jens Möller;Olaf Köller

  • Reading achievement and reading self-concept – Testing the reciprocal effects model

    Jan Retelsdorf;Olaf Köller;Jens Möller

  • Motivationale Grundlagen der Lesekompetenz

    Jens Möller;Ulrich Schiefele

  • Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model.

    Jens Möller;Olaf Köller

  • Measuring grit: A German validation and a domain-specific approach to grit.

    Fabian T. C. Schmidt;Johanna Fleckenstein;Jan Retelsdorf;Lauren Eskreis-Winkler

  • Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments

    Johanna Kaiser;Jan Retelsdorf;Anna Südkamp;Jens Möller

  • The Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Self-Concept and Achievement Relations: Age-Cohort and Cross-Cultural Differences

    Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Herbert W. Marsh;Adel Salah Abduljabbar;Philip D. Parker;Alexandre J. S. Morin

  • A Meta-Analysis of Relations Between Achievement and Self-Concept:

    Jens Möller;Steffen Zitzmann;Friederike Helm;Nils Machts

  • Dimensional comparison theory : An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation

    Herbert W. Marsh;Hans Kuyper;Marjorie Seaton;Philip D. Parker

  • Same Same, but Different? Relations Between Facets of Conscientiousness and Grit

    Fabian T.C. Schmidt;Fabian T.C. Schmidt;Gabriel Nagy;Johanna Fleckenstein;Johanna Fleckenstein;Jens Möller

  • Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis

    Nils Machts;Johanna Kaiser;Fabian T.C. Schmidt;Jens Möller

  • An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains

    Jens Möller;Lilian Streblow;Britta Pohlmann;Olaf Köller

  • Grundschule oder Gymnasium? Zur Motivation ein Lehramt zu studieren

    Jan Retelsdorf;Jens Möller

  • Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Motivation für die Wahl des Lehramtsstudiums (FEMOLA) 1Dieser Beitrag wurde unter der Herausgeberschaft von D. Leutner und D. H. Rost bearbeitet.

    Britta Pohlmann;Jens Möller

Frequent Co-Authors

Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus
Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus Bielefeld University
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
Ulrich Schiefele
Ulrich Schiefele University of Potsdam
Allan Wigfield
Allan Wigfield University of Maryland, College Park
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Oliver T. Wolf
Oliver T. Wolf Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open pathways to diverse, meaningful careers in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students consider obtaining an online psychology degree as a flexible option that supports future licensure goals. However, it’s important to understand that licensure requirements differ significantly from state to state.

For example, the Delaware lpc licensure requirements outline specific educational, examination, and supervised experience criteria unique to the state. Similarly, meeting lpc licensure requirements in Florida involves its own processes and clinical hours.

If you wish to practice elsewhere, it’s essential to research local guidelines. For example, if you’re interested in working in the South, familiarize yourself with how to get an lpc license in Georgia. Likewise, those aiming to practice in the Pacific should review lpc licensure requirements in Hawaii.

Each state’s pathway affects your education choices, internship opportunities, and future career options. Always check the latest requirements in your desired location to ensure your online degree aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Möller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles