World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marianne Schmid Mast

Marianne Schmid Mast

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8597
World Ranking
5720
National Ranking
63

Marianne Schmid Mast publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Schmid Mast sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marianne Schmid Mast D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Schmid Mast sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marianne Schmid Mast is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Within these broad disciplines, they examine specific subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including Innovations in Medical Education, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Empathy and Medical Education, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Communication in Education and Healthcare, and Personality Traits and Psychology.

Marianne Schmid Mast has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why, 2022, The Leadership Quarterly
  • The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions, 2020, Higher Education
  • The relationship between medical students' empathy, mental health, and burnout: A cross-sectional study, 2022, Medical Teacher
  • To err is human, not algorithmic - Robust reactions to erring algorithms, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Virtual patient simulation in breaking bad news training for medical students, 2020, Patient Education and Counseling

Frequent coauthors in their research include Laetitia A. Renier, Emmanuelle P. Kleinlogel, Valérie Carrard, Céline Bourquin, and Katja Schlegel. These collaborative relationships have contributed to a consistent output across various topics related to healthcare education and social psychology.

Marianne Schmid Mast often publishes in venues such as Patient Education and Counseling, Academy of Management Proceedings, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, The Leadership Quarterly, and Medical Teacher. These venues reflect a blend of interests in medical education, leadership, and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • StressSense: detecting stress in unconstrained acoustic environments using smartphones

    Hong Lu;Denise Frauendorfer;Mashfiqui Rabbi;Marianne Schmid Mast

  • On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction.

    Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: the phenomenon and its why and when.

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Klaus Jonas;Judith A. Hall

  • Successful female leaders empower women's behavior in leadership tasks

    Ioana M. Latu;Marianne Schmid Mast;Joris Lammers;Dario Bombari

  • Who is the Boss and Who is Not? Accuracy of Judging Status.

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Judith A. Hall

  • Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm

    Judith A. Hall;Marianne Schmid Mast

  • A Nonverbal Behavior Approach to Identify Emergent Leaders in Small Groups

    D. Sanchez-Cortes;O. Aran;M. S. Mast;D. Gatica-Perez

  • Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: Their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Judith A. Hall;Debra L. Roter

  • Are Women Always More Interpersonally Sensitive Than Men? Impact of Goals and Content Domain

    Judith A. Hall;Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Hire me: Computational Inference of Hirability in Employment Interviews Based on Nonverbal Behavior

    Laurent Son Nguyen;Denise Frauendorfer;Marianne Schmid Mast;Daniel Gatica-Perez

  • Recipients’ perspective on breaking bad news: How you put it really makes a difference

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Annette Kindlimann;Wolf Langewitz

  • Emotion recognition: The role of featural and configural face information

    Dario Bombari;Petra C. Schmid;Marianne Schmid Mast;Sandra Birri

  • Mood effects on emotion recognition

    Petra Claudia Schmid;Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Concordance between physician communication style and patient attitudes predicts patient satisfaction

    Gaëtan Cousin;Marianne Schmid Mast;Debra L. Roter;Judith A. Hall

  • Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges

    Dario Bombari;Marianne Schmid Mast;Elena Canadas;Manuel Bachmann

  • Dominance as expressed and inferred through speaking time: A meta-analysis

    Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests

    Judith A. Hall;Susan A. Andrzejewski;Nora A. Murphy;Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Masculinity causes speeding in young men

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Monika Sieverding;Michaela Esslen;Karin Graber

  • Social Sensing for Psychology Automated Interpersonal Behavior Assessment

    Marianne Schmid Mast;Daniel Gatica-Perez;Denise Frauendorfer;Laurent Nguyen

  • Men are hierarchical, women are egalitarian: An implicit gender stereotype.

    Marianne Schmid Mast

  • Recall of Nonverbal Cues: Exploring a New Definition of Interpersonal Sensitivity

    Judith A. Hall;Nora A. Murphy;Marianne Schmid Mast

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith A. Hall
Judith A. Hall Northeastern University
Daniel Gatica-Perez
Daniel Gatica-Perez Idiap Research Institute
Tessa V. West
Tessa V. West New York University
Debra L. Roter
Debra L. Roter Johns Hopkins University
Fred W. Mast
Fred W. Mast University of Bern
Joris Lammers
Joris Lammers University of Cologne
William Ickes
William Ickes The University of Texas at Arlington
Crystal L. Hoyt
Crystal L. Hoyt University of Richmond
Adrian Bangerter
Adrian Bangerter University of Neuchâtel
Tanzeem Choudhury
Tanzeem Choudhury Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens doors to a range of programs, from foundational bachelor’s degrees to specialized master’s offerings. Many universities in the USA now provide flexible online psychology degrees designed for working adults and students seeking career advancement.

Popular degrees often emphasize clinical psychology, counseling, forensic psychology, and organizational behavior, allowing students to tailor their learning to specific interests and career aspirations. For instance, the popular psychology degrees in Orlando focus on clinical and child psychology, while the popular psychology programs in Reno emphasize experimental and cognitive approaches.

Other regions have their own unique strengths. The most popular psychology degree programs in Seattle are known for their integration with research on behavior and technology. Meanwhile, the popular psychology programs in University, MS offer strong pathways into counseling and mental health services.

Graduates can pursue roles in mental health support, human resources, education, or healthcare advocacy, or advance to graduate studies. With online options, finding the right fit is now more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Marianne Schmid Mast

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles