World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6263
World Ranking
8863
National Ranking
102

Adrian Bangerter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Bangerter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Adrian Bangerter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Bangerter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian Bangerter is affiliated with the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland. Their research spans primarily the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a notable focus on social psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their main research topics include misinformation and its impacts, child and animal learning development, primate behavior and ecology, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, language, metaphor, and cognition, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, as well as language, discourse, and communication strategies.

Bangerter has contributed to recent publications such as:

  • "Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries," 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Investigating the Links Between Cultural Values and Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Key Roles of Collectivism and Masculinity," 2020, Political Psychology
  • "Assessing joint commitment as a process in great apes," 2021, iScience
  • "Bonobos engage in joint commitment," 2020, Science Advances
  • "How apes get into and out of joint actions," 2020, Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems

Frequent publication venues for Bangerter include:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Science Advances
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • International Journal of Selection and Assessment
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Klaus Zuberbühler, Émilie Genty, Raphaela Heesen, Federico Rossano, and Pascal Wagner-Egger.

Best Publications

  • Personnel Selection as a Signaling Game

    Adrian Bangerter;Nicolas Roulin;Cornelius J. König

  • The Mozart effect: Tracking the evolution of a scientific legend

    Adrian Bangerter;Chip Heath

  • Navigating joint projects with dialogue

    Adrian Bangerter;Herbert H. Clark

  • Using Pointing and Describing to Achieve Joint Focus of Attention in Dialogue

    Adrian Bangerter

  • Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory

    Bradley Franks;Adrian Bangerter;Martin W. Bauer

  • Changing Ideas about Reference

    Herbert H. Clark;Adrian Bangerter

  • Beyond “Monologicality”? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews

    Bradley Franks;Adrian Bangerter;Martin W. Bauer;Matthew Hall

  • Students’ use of extra-curricular activities for positional advantage in competitive job markets

    Nicolas Roulin;Adrian Bangerter

  • Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: : Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations?

    Nicolas Roulin;Adrian Bangerter;Julia Levashina

  • Implications of the behavioural immune system for social behaviour and human health in the modern world.

    Mark Schaller;Damian R. Murray;Adrian Bangerter

  • The Interplay Between Gesture and Speech in the Production of Referring Expressions: Investigating the Tradeoff Hypothesis

    Jan Peter De Ruiter;Adrian Bangerter;Paula Dings

  • The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective

    Veronica Gomez;Franciska Krings;Adrian Bangerter;Alexander Grob

  • Life Markers in Biographical Narratives of People from Three Cohorts: A Life Span Perspective in Its Historical Context

    Alexander Grob;Franciska Krings;Adrian Bangerter

  • Storytelling as Adaptive Collective Sensemaking

    Lucas M. Bietti;Ottilie Tilston;Adrian Bangerter

  • Transformation between scientific and social representations of conception: The method of serial reproduction

    Adrian Bangerter

  • Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews

    Nicolas Roulin;Adrian Bangerter;Julia Levashina

  • Flexible Coordination of Stationary and Mobile Conversations with Gaze

    Eric Mayor;Adrian Bangerter

  • Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: heroes, villains and victims

    Pascal Wagner-Egger;Adrian Bangerter;Ingrid Gilles;Eva G. T. Green

  • Social Networking Websites in Personnel Selection A Signaling Perspective on Recruiters' and Applicants' Perceptions

    Nicolas Roulin;Adrian Bangerter

  • Keeping the vermin out: Perceived disease threat and ideological orientations as predictors of exclusionary immigration attitudes

    Eva G. T. Green;Franciska Krings;Christian Staerklé;Adrian Bangerter

  • Navigating Joint Projects in Telephone Conversations

    Adrian Bangerter;Herbert H. Clark;Anna R. Katz

Frequent Co-Authors

Eva G. T. Green
Eva G. T. Green University of Lausanne
Klaus Zuberbühler
Klaus Zuberbühler University of Neuchâtel
Redouan Bshary
Redouan Bshary University of Neuchâtel
Herbert H. Clark
Herbert H. Clark Stanford University
Aleksandra Cichocka
Aleksandra Cichocka University of Kent
Martin W. Bauer
Martin W. Bauer London School of Economics and Political Science
Marianne Schmid Mast
Marianne Schmid Mast University of Lausanne
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Roland Imhoff
Roland Imhoff Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Michał Bilewicz
Michał Bilewicz University of Warsaw

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of career opportunities, especially in mental health and counseling. Many students choose pathways that prepare them to become licensed therapists, which requires understanding specific regional regulations.

Each city and state may have different standards for licensure. For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Aurora outline educational qualifications and supervised practice hours unique to Colorado. Those wishing to practice in Texas should review the licensed therapist requirements in Austin, as they may differ in coursework and examination needs.

Similarly, if you are considering a career in California, understanding the Bakersfield licensed therapist requirements is essential. Maryland students should explore the licensed therapist requirements in Baltimore to ensure proper state-specific preparation.

With the growth of online degree programs, it’s now easier to meet these varying requirements while balancing other commitments. Carefully review licensing details for your desired location to streamline your education and launch your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian Bangerter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles