World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7564
World Ranking
7536
National Ranking
510

Jeremy C. Biesanz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy C. Biesanz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeremy C. Biesanz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy C. Biesanz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy C. Biesanz is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has a significant body of research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work spans a variety of subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's research topics cover areas such as Mental Health Research, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Personality Traits and Psychology, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology.

Jeremy C. Biesanz has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent articles appearing in:

  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Emotion
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Influencing emotion: Social anxiety and comparisons on Instagram." (2021, Emotion)
  • "The incremental validity of average states: A replication and extension of Finnigan and Vazire (2018)." (2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "In person, online, and up close: the cross-contextual consistency of expressive accuracy" (2020, European Journal of Personality)
  • "Examining the consistency of the good target across contexts and domains of personality" (2020, Journal of Personality)
  • "A global experience-sampling method study of well-being during times of crisis: The CoCo project" (2023, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)

Jeremy C. Biesanz has collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Mitja D. Back
  • Philip J. Corr
  • Lauren J. Human
  • Marco Perugini
  • Simon Mats Breil

In addition to journal articles, the scientist has contributed to book publications, including a work published by Cambridge University Press:

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology (2020)

Best Publications

  • The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models.

    Jeremy C. Biesanz;Natalia Deeb-Sossa;Alison A. Papadakis;Kenneth A. Bollen

  • Assessing Mediational Models: Testing and Interval Estimation for Indirect Effects

    Jeremy C. Biesanz;Carl F. Falk;Victoria Savalei

  • The frequency, trajectories and predictors of adolescent recurrent pain: A population-based approach

    Elizabeth A. Stanford;Christine T. Chambers;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Edith Chen

  • Family and social risk, and parental investments during the early childhood years as predictors of low-income children's school readiness outcomes

    Rashmita S. Mistry;Aprile D. Benner;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Shaunna L. Clark

  • Family income and its relation to preschool children's adjustment for families in the NICHD Study of Early Child Care.

    Rashmita S. Mistry;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Lorraine C. Taylor;Margaret Burchinal

  • Socioeconomic status, parental investments, and the cognitive and behavioral outcomes of low-income children from immigrant and native households

    Rashmita S. Mistry;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Nina Chien;Carollee Howes

  • What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood Physical Attractiveness and Accuracy in First Impressions of Personality

    Genevieve L. Lorenzo;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Lauren J. Human

  • Rehabilitative day treatment vs. supported employment: I. Vocational outcomes

    Robert E. Drake;Deborah R. Becker;Jeremy C. Biesanz;William C. Torrey

  • Causal inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    Stephen G. West;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Steven C. Pitts

  • What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality.

    Jeremy C. Biesanz;Stephen G. West;Allison Millevoi

  • The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy.

    Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Towards Understanding Assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait‐Multimethod Analyses of Convergent and Discriminant Validity Across Measurement Occasion and Type of Observer

    Jeremy C. Biesanz;Stephen G. West

  • Daily Cognitive Appraisals, Daily Affect, and Long-Term Depressive Symptoms: The Role of Self-Esteem and Self-Concept Clarity in the Stress Process:

    Sharon C. Lee-Flynn;Georgia Pomaki;Anita DeLongis;Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Through the looking glass clearly: accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions.

    Lauren J. Human;Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Misunderstanding the affective consequences of everyday social interactions: the hidden benefits of putting one's best face forward.

    Elizabeth W. Dunn;Jeremy C. Biesanz;Lauren J. Human;Stephanie Finn

  • Day treatment versus supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: a replication study.

    R E Drake;D R Becker;J C Biesanz;P F Wyzik

  • The test-retest reliability of standardized instruments among homeless persons with substance use disorders

    Robert E. Drake;Gregory J. McHUGO;Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Targeting the Good Target An Integrative Review of the Characteristics and Consequences of Being Accurately Perceived

    Lauren J. Human;Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Two Cross-Platform Programs for Inferences and Interval Estimation About Indirect Effects in Mediational Models

    Carl F. Falk;Jeremy C. Biesanz

  • Personality coherence: moderating self--other profile agreement and profile consensus.

    Jeremy C. Biesanz;Stephen G. West

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Robert E. Drake
Robert E. Drake Westat (United States)
Elizabeth W. Dunn
Elizabeth W. Dunn University of British Columbia
Gregory J. McHugo
Gregory J. McHugo Dartmouth College
Edith Chen
Edith Chen Northwestern University
Rashmita S. Mistry
Rashmita S. Mistry University of California, Los Angeles
Christine T. Chambers
Christine T. Chambers Dalhousie University
Carollee Howes
Carollee Howes University of California, Los Angeles
Aprile D. Benner
Aprile D. Benner The University of Texas at Austin
Oi-Man Kwok
Oi-Man Kwok Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and flexible career pathways in the mental health field. Many universities now offer online programs that provide quality training for aspiring professionals seeking balance between study and work. These programs typically cover essential topics like therapeutic methods, human development, and ethical practice.

Choosing the right program can depend on your individual goals and where you hope to practice. For example, Georgia counseling degree programs emphasize practical experience and licensure preparation. Meanwhile, the best counseling program rankings in Iowa highlight institutions known for academic rigor and strong faculty support.

If you are considering urban environments, the best counseling degree programs in Illinois and Los Angeles counseling degree programs offer diverse clinical training opportunities and networking possibilities. Overall, online degrees in psychology and counseling can pave the way to meaningful careers in various settings, helping you support individuals and communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy C. Biesanz

Trending Scientists