World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4778 4425 2648 2396 149 12121

Oi-Man Kwok publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oi-Man Kwok between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oi-Man Kwok published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 16 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications
2003 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oi-Man Kwok: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 11
2011 12
2012 13
2013 9
2014 9
2015 8
2016 12
2017 7
2018 9
2019 10
2020 4
2021 9
2022 8
2023 7
2024 5
2025 11
Total 170
Download as CSV

Oi-Man Kwok publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oi-Man Kwok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 149
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Oi-Man Kwok D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oi-Man Kwok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Oi-Man Kwok is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and has an academic focus primarily spanning psychology and social sciences. Their work notably intersects with education, cognitive psychology, and computer science applications, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to research.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Subfields of study that Kwok has contributed to involve:

  • Education
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Computer Science Applications

Key topics addressed in Kwok's research include:

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Kwok has published frequently in several academic venues. Notable journals with multiple publications are:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computers & Education
  • Online Learning

Recent papers authored by Kwok or involving their contribution include:

  • A review of using multilevel modeling in e-learning research, 2023, Computers & Education
  • An important component to investigating STEM persistence: the development and validation of the science identity (SciID) scale, 2022, International Journal of STEM Education
  • Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition, 2020, Journal of School Psychology
  • Predicting STEM Major Choice: a Machine Learning Classification and Regression Tree Approach, 2023, Journal for STEM Education Research
  • Using learning analytics with temporal modeling to uncover the interplay of before-class video viewing engagement, motivation, and performance in an active learning context, 2023, Computers & Education

Frequent collaborators in Kwok's research efforts include:

  • Lei-Shih Chen
  • Chi-Ning Chang
  • Shixi Zhao
  • Ming Li
  • Jiun-Yu Wu

Best Publications

  • Influence of Student–Teacher and Parent–Teacher Relationships on Lower Achieving Readers’ Engagement and Achievement in the Primary Grades

    Jan N. Hughes;Oi-man Kwok

  • Teacher–Student Support, Effortful Engagement, and Achievement: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study

    Jan N. Hughes;Wen Luo;Oi-Man Kwok;Linda K. Loyd

  • Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

    Roger E. Millsap;Oi-Man Kwok

  • The family bereavement program: efficacy evaluation of a theory-based prevention program for parentally bereaved children and adolescents.

    Irwin N. Sandler;Tim S. Ayers;Sharlene A. Wolchik;Jenn-Yun Tein

  • Dynamics of Teacher-Student Relationships: Stability and Change across Elementary School and the Influence on Children's Academic Success.

    Jantine L. Spilt;Jan N. Hughes;Jiun-Yu Wu;Oi Man Kwok

  • Analyzing Longitudinal Data with Multilevel Models: An Example with Individuals Living with Lower Extremity Intra-articular Fractures.

    Oi-Man Kwok;Andrea T. Underhill;Jack W. Berry;Wen Luo

  • National Prevalence Rates of Bully Victimization Among Students With Disabilities in the United States

    Jamilia J. Blake;Emily M. Lund;Qiong Zhou;Oi-man Kwok

  • Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher-student support on elementary students' peer acceptance: A prospective analysis.

    Jan N. Hughes;Oi-man Kwok

  • Teacher-student relationship quality type in elementary grades: Effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement.

    Jiun-Yu Wu;Jan N. Hughes;Oi Man Kwok

  • Indexing Response to Intervention A Longitudinal Study of Reading Risk From Kindergarten Through Third Grade

    Deborah C. Simmons;Michael D. Coyne;Oi-man Kwok;Sarah McDonagh

  • Indirect Effects of Child Reports of Teacher-Student Relationship on Achievement.

    Jan N. Hughes;Jiun Yu Wu;Oi Man Kwok;Victor Villarreal

  • Examining the Rule of Thumb of Not Using Multilevel Modeling: The “Design Effect Smaller Than Two” Rule

    Mark H. C. Lai;Oi-man Kwok

  • The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation modeling analysis

    Zahira Merchant;Ernest T. Goetz;Wendy Keeney-Kennicutt;Oi-man Kwok

  • University Faculty Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices in Providing Reasonable Accommodations to Students With Disabilities

    Dalun Zhang;Leena Landmark;Anne Reber;Hsien-Yuan Hsu

  • The Effects of an Intensive Shared Book-Reading Intervention for Preschool Children at Risk for Vocabulary Delay

    Sharolyn D. Pollard-Durodola;Jorge E. Gonzalez;Deborah C. Simmons;Oiman Kwok

  • Putting Wilson and Cleary to the test: analysis of a HRQOL conceptual model using structural equation modeling.

    Karen H. Sousa;Oi-Man Kwok

  • Accelerating Early Academic Oral English Development in Transitional Bilingual and Structured English Immersion Programs

    Fuhui Tong;Rafael Lara-Alecio;Beverly Irby;Patricia Mathes

  • The Impact of Misspecifying the Within-Subject Covariance Structure in Multiwave Longitudinal Multilevel Models: A Monte Carlo Study

    Oi-man Kwok;Stephen G. West;Samuel B. Green

  • Multilevel Modeling: Current and Future Applications in Personality Research

    Stephen G. West;Ehri Ryu;Oi‐Man Kwok;Heining Cham

  • The Impact of Basic-Level Parent Engagements on Student Achievement: Patterns Associated with Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status (SES)

    Dalun Zhang;Hsien-Yuan Hsu;Oi-man Kwok;Michael Benz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan N. Hughes
Jan N. Hughes Texas A&M University
Deborah C. Simmons
Deborah C. Simmons Texas A&M University
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Michael D. Coyne
Michael D. Coyne University of Connecticut
Nathan A. Kimbrel
Nathan A. Kimbrel Duke University
Jeffrey Liew
Jeffrey Liew Texas A&M University
Timothy R. Elliott
Timothy R. Elliott Texas A&M University
Suzy B. Gulliver
Suzy B. Gulliver Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Sandra B. Morissette
Sandra B. Morissette The University of Texas at San Antonio
Dalun Zhang
Dalun Zhang Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in studying psychology but unsure which career path fits you best? Online psychology degrees open doors to a wide range of opportunities, from counseling and clinical work to research and teaching. One fast-growing field is Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). The journey toward becoming a therapist involves meeting specific requirements and obtaining licensure—which varies by location.

For example, those looking into mft requirements in Chesapeake need to complete a graduate program, supervised clinical hours, and pass a national exam. If you’re exploring mft requirements in Chicago, you must also satisfy local state regulations. Prospective therapists researching how to become an mft in Chula Vista or how to become an mft in Cincinnati will find that each city may have unique academic prerequisites, background checks, and licensure steps.

Before enrolling in an online psychology program, research your chosen career’s local requirements. This ensures your degree will support your goals and help you meet all necessary credentials, wherever you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Oi-Man Kwok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles