World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
12449
World Ranking
3854
National Ranking
102

Peter Fuhr publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Fuhr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 291 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Fuhr D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Fuhr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Fuhr is a researcher affiliated with the University Hospital of Basel in Switzerland. The primary fields of study encompass Neuroscience and Medicine, with a detailed focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of Peter Fuhr's research work include:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Retinal Development and Disorders

Frequent publication venues for Fuhr's work include Clinical Neurophysiology with 10 publications, Neurobiology of Aging and Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders with 3 publications each, as well as Alzheimer's & Dementia and Neurology also with multiple publications.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Fuhr include:

  • Encephalitis with Autoantibodies against the Glutamate Kainate Receptors GluK2, 2021, Annals of Neurology
  • Functional Brain Dysconnectivity in Parkinson's Disease: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study, 2022, Movement Disorders
  • Identification of Parkinson's Disease Subtypes from Resting-State Electroencephalography, 2023, Movement Disorders
  • Abnormal cortical neural synchronization mechanisms in quiet wakefulness are related to motor deficits, cognitive symptoms, and visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease patients: an electroencephalographic study, 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Abnormalities of resting-state EEG in patients with prodromal and overt dementia with Lewy bodies: Relation to clinical symptoms, 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology

Peter Fuhr has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Ute Gschwandtner (36 co-authored works), Andrea H. Meyer (14 co-authored works), Claudio Babiloni (12 co-authored works), Görsev Yener (12 co-authored works), and Bahar Güntekin (11 co-authored works).

Best Publications

  • Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation.

    Peter Fuhr;Rocco Agostino;Mark Hallett

  • Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility.

    Joaquim P. Brasil-Neto;Lisa M. McShane;Peter Fuhr;Mark Hallett

  • Directional deep brain stimulation: an intraoperative double-blind pilot study.

    Claudio Pollo;Alain Kaelin-Lang;Markus F. Oertel;Lennart Stieglitz

  • Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles

    Eric M. Wassermann;Peter Fuhr;Leonardo G. Cohen;Mark Hallett

  • Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of myasthenia gravis: a supplement to the Guidelines of the German Neurological Society.

    Nico Melzer;Tobias Ruck;Peter Fuhr;Ralf Gold

  • The clinical and laboratory features of chronic sensory ataxic neuropathy with anti-disialosyl IgM antibodies.

    H J Willison;C P O'Leary;J Veitch;L D Blumhardt

  • Anesthetic drugs in status epilepticus: Risk or rescue? A 6-year cohort study

    Raoul Sutter;Stephan Marsch;Peter Fuhr;Peter W. Kaplan

  • Reproducibility of functional connectivity and graph measures based on the phase lag index (PLI) and weighted phase lag index (wPLI) derived from high resolution EEG.

    Martin Hardmeier;Florian Hatz;Habib Bousleiman;Christian Schindler

  • TNF-alpha expression in painful and nonpainful neuropathies

    M. Empl;S. Renaud;B. Erne;P. Fuhr

  • Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics: Frequency, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcome

    David T. Winkler;Felix Fluri;Peter Fuhr;Stephan G. Wetzel

  • Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis

    P. Fuhr;A. Borggrefe-Chappuis;C. Schindler;L. Kappos

  • Rituximab in the treatment of polyneuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies.

    Susanne Renaud;Michael Gregor;Peter Fuhr;Delia Lorenz

  • Pathologic gambling in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Ute Gschwandtner;Jacqueline Aston;Susanne Renaud;Peter Fuhr

  • Physiological analysis of motor reorganization following lower limb amputation.

    Peter Fuhr;Leonardo G. Cohen;Nguyet Dang;Thomas W. Findley

  • Olfactory Impairment Predicts Brain Atrophy in Parkinson's Disease

    Elise Wattendorf;Antje Welge-Lüssen;Klaus Fiedler;Deniz Bilecen

  • Mortality and recovery from refractory status epilepticus in the intensive care unit: A 7‐year observational study

    Raoul Sutter;Stephan Marsch;Peter Fuhr;Stephan Rüegg

  • Magnetic stimulation of the human cerebral cortex, an indicator of reorganization in motor pathways in certain pathological conditions.

    Leonardo G. Cohen;Bradley J. Roth;Eric M. Wassermann;Helge Topka

  • IgM deposits on skin nerves in anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy.

    Raffaella Lombardi;Beat Erne;Giuseppe Lauria;Davide Pareyson

  • Topographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries.

    L G Cohen;S Bandinelli;H R Topka;P Fuhr

  • Continuous video-EEG monitoring increases detection rate of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the ICU

    Raoul Sutter;Peter Fuhr;Leticia Grize;Leticia Grize;Stephan Marsch

  • Functional imaging of the cerebral olfactory system in patients with Parkinson’s disease

    B Westermann;E Wattendorf;U Schwerdtfeger;A Husner

Frequent Co-Authors

Ute Gschwandtner
Ute Gschwandtner University of Basel
Christian Schindler
Christian Schindler Columbia University
Ludwig Kappos
Ludwig Kappos University Hospital of Basel
Volker Roth
Volker Roth University of Basel
Claudio Babiloni
Claudio Babiloni Sapienza University of Rome
Flavio Nobili
Flavio Nobili University of Genoa
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Andrea Soricelli
Andrea Soricelli Parthenope University of Naples
Roberta Lizio
Roberta Lizio Sapienza University of Rome
Görsev Yener
Görsev Yener Dokuz Eylül University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Fuhr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles