World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
14689
World Ranking
7137
National Ranking
3276

O. John Semmes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where O. John Semmes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 201 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

O. John Semmes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where O. John Semmes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

O. John Semmes is affiliated with the Eastern Virginia Medical School in the United States. Their research spans several domains within medicine and molecular biology, focused primarily on prostate cancer treatment and related biomedical fields.

Semmes has published extensively across multiple venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • PLoS Pathogens
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Prostate

The main fields of study covered in Semmes's publications are Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within those broader fields, prominent subfields include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Immunology, and Cancer Research.

Their research topics concentrate on:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Extracellular Vesicles in Disease
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • T-cell and Retrovirus Studies

Semmes has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Julius O. Nyalwidhe
  • Brian P. Main
  • Paul C. Boutros
  • Dean A. Troyer
  • Thomas Kislinger

Recent notable publications by Semmes include:

  • Prostate cancer reshapes the secreted and extracellular vesicle urinary proteomes, 2024, Nature Communications
  • Optimization of small extracellular vesicle isolation from expressed prostatic secretions in urine for in-depth proteomic analysis, 2022, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • NF-κB-induced R-loop accumulation and DNA damage select for nucleotide excision repair deficiencies in adult T cell leukemia, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Direct N-Glycosylation Profiling of Urine and Prostatic Fluid Glycoproteins and Extracellular Vesicles, 2021, Frontiers in Chemistry
  • Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Best Publications

  • Serum Protein Fingerprinting Coupled with a Pattern-matching Algorithm Distinguishes Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Healthy Men

    Bao Ling Adam;Yinsheng Qu;John W. Davis;Michael D. Ward

  • Boosted Decision Tree Analysis of Surface-enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectral Serum Profiles Discriminates Prostate Cancer from Noncancer Patients

    Yinsheng Qu;Bao Ling Adam;Yutaka Yasui;Michael D. Ward

  • Evaluation of Serum Protein Profiling by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: I. Assessment of Platform Reproducibility

    O. John Semmes;Ziding Feng;Bao Ling Adam;Lionel L. Banez

  • Tissue Imaging Using Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

    Julia Laskin;Brandi S. Heath;Patrick J. Roach;Lisa H. Cazares

  • Clinical proteomics: A need to define the field and to begin to set adequate standards.

    Harald Mischak;Rolf Apweiler;Rosamonde E. Banks;Mark Conaway

  • Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics

    Harald Mischak;Guenter Allmaier;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa Attwood

  • Lectin Capture Strategies Combined with Mass Spectrometry for the Discovery of Serum Glycoprotein Biomarkers

    Richard R. Drake;E. Ellen Schwegler;Gunjan Malik;Jose Diaz

  • Imaging Mass Spectrometry of a Specific Fragment of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase Kinase 2 Discriminates Cancer from Uninvolved Prostate Tissue

    Lisa H. Cazares;Dean Troyer;Savvas Mendrinos;Raymond A. Lance

  • Normal, benign, preneoplastic, and malignant prostate cells have distinct protein expression profiles resolved by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

    Lisa H. Cazares;Bao Ling Adam;Michael D. Ward;Suhail Nasim

  • Proteomic approaches to biomarker discovery in prostate and bladder cancers.

    Bao Ling Adam;Antonia Vlahou;Oliver John Semmes;George L. Wright

  • Human LINE-1 retrotransposon induces DNA damage and apoptosis in cancer cells

    S Mehdi Belgnaoui;Roger G Gosden;O John Semmes;Abdelali Haoudi

  • Impact of HTLV-I Tax on cell cycle progression and the cellular DNA damage repair response

    Susan J Marriott;Oliver John Semmes

  • SELDI-TOF MS profiling of serum for detection of the progression of chronic hepatitis C to hepatocellular carcinoma.

    E. Ellen Schwegler;Lisa Cazares;Laura F. Steel;Bao Ling Adam

  • Serum Levels of an Isoform of Apolipoprotein A-II as a Potential Marker for Prostate Cancer

    Gunjan Malik;Michael D. Ward;Saurabh K. Gupta;Michael W. Trosset

  • A Novel Approach Toward Development of a Rapid Blood Test for Breast Cancer

    Antonia Vlahou;Christine Laronga;Lori Wilson;Betsy Gregory

  • National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice: Quality Requirements

    Catharine M. Sturgeon;Barry R. Hoffman;Daniel W. Chan;Soo Ling Ch'ng

  • In-depth proteomic analyses of exosomes isolated from expressed prostatic secretions in urine

    Simona Principe;E. Ellen Jones;Yunee Kim;Ankit Sinha

  • Restriction of Virus Infection but Not Catalytic dNTPase Activity Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of SAMHD1

    Sarah Welbourn;Sucharita M. Dutta;O. John Semmes;Klaus Strebel

  • Serum protein profiles to identify head and neck cancer.

    J. Trad Wadsworth;Kenneth D. Somers;Lisa H. Cazares;Gunjan Malik

  • Serum Protein Fingerprinting Coupled with a Pattern-matching Algorithm Distinguishes Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Healthy Men 1

    Bao-Ling Adam;Yinsheng Qu;John W. Davis;Michael D. Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Ward
Michael D. Ward New York University
Ziding Feng
Ziding Feng Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Thomas Kislinger
Thomas Kislinger University of Toronto
William E. Grizzle
William E. Grizzle University of Alabama at Birmingham
Yutaka Yasui
Yutaka Yasui St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Daniel W. Chan
Daniel W. Chan Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Paul F. Schellhammer
Paul F. Schellhammer Eastern Virginia Medical School
Ian M. Thompson
Ian M. Thompson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jeffrey A. Medin
Jeffrey A. Medin Medical College of Wisconsin
Anand Mehta
Anand Mehta Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing O. John Semmes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles