World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 122 3458 3227 1901 1752 843 58153

Daniel W. Chan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel W. Chan between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel W. Chan published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 21.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2012. 9 of the 1,054 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2012. 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 6 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 24 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 32 publications 2004: 35 publications 2005: 52 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 53 publications 2008: 60 publications 2009: 43 publications 2010: 57 publications 2011: 40 publications 2012: 64 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1977 2025

1,054 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel W. Chan: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 3
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 4
1984 2
1985 1
1986 6
1987 9
1988 5
1989 6
1990 2
1991 4
1992 13
1993 4
1994 6
1995 13
1996 9
1997 14
1998 21
1999 24
2000 14
2001 17
2002 32
2003 32
2004 35
2005 52
2006 38
2007 53
2008 60
2009 43
2010 57
2011 40
2012 64
2013 41
2014 38
2015 44
2016 39
2017 28
2018 19
2019 36
2020 52
2021 46
2022 7
2023 6
2024 5
2025 4
Total 1,054
Download as CSV

Daniel W. Chan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Chan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 841–860 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 843 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177 843
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel W. Chan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Chan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 122–123 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255 122
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel W. Chan is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. The subfields of their research also include Molecular Biology, Economics and Econometrics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Algebra and Number Theory.

Their work covers a range of topics within medicine. Key research areas addressed by Daniel W. Chan include Heart Failure Treatment and Management, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Medication Adherence and Compliance, and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies.

Daniel W. Chan has contributed to numerous publications with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • New Zealand Medical Journal
  • Heart
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cell

They have collaborated frequently with a cohort of researchers including Andrew Kerr, Robert N. Doughty, Mayanna Lund, Katrina Poppe, and J. Somaratne.

Their recent papers highlight contributions in both cardiovascular medicine and cancer genomics. Notable recent publications include:

  • Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy (2020, Cell)
  • Glycoproteomics-based signatures for tumor subtyping and clinical outcome prediction of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Integrative multi-omic cancer profiling reveals DNA methylation patterns associated with therapeutic vulnerability and cell-of-origin (2023, Cancer Cell)
  • The impact of a national COVID-19 lockdown on acute coronary syndrome hospitalisations in New Zealand (ANZACS-QI 55) (2020, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific)
  • Temporal trends in the burden of heart failure (2021, Internal Medicine Journal)

Best Publications

  • Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

    Charles R. Pound;Alan W. Partin;Mario A. Eisenberger;Daniel W. Chan

  • The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

    Alan W. Partin;John Yoo;H. Ballentine Carter;Jay D. Pearson

  • Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease.

    H. Ballentine Carter;Jay D. Pearson;E. Jeffrey Metter;Larry J. Brant;Larry J. Brant

  • Proteomics and Bioinformatics Approaches for Identification of Serum Biomarkers to Detect Breast Cancer

    Jinong Li;Zhen Zhang;Jason Rosenzweig;Young Y. Wang

  • Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer

    Zhen Zhang;Robert C. Bast;Yinhua Yu;Jinong Li

  • Immunosensors--principles and applications to clinical chemistry.

    Peter B. Luppa;Lori J. Sokoll;Daniel W. Chan

  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

    Hui Zhang;Tao Liu;Zhen Zhang;Samuel H. Payne

  • Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database.

    Gilbert S. Omenn;David J. States;Marcin Adamski;Thomas W. Blackwell

  • Prostate Specific Antigen in the Staging of Localized Prostate Cancer: Influence of Tumor Differentiation, Tumor Volume and Benign Hyperplasia

    Alan W. Partin;H. Ballentine Carter;Daniel W. Chan;Jonathan I. Epstein

  • Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group.

    Melissa K. Tuck;Daniel W. Chan;David Chia;Andrew K. Godwin

  • Proteogenomic Characterization Reveals Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Lung Adenocarcinoma

    Michael A. Gillette;Michael A. Gillette;Shankha Satpathy;Song Cao;Saravana M. Dhanasekaran

  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

    David J. Clark;Saravana M. Dhanasekaran;Francesca Petralia;Jianbo Pan

  • Prostate Specific Antigen in the Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation of Localized Prostatic Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy

    Joseph E. Oesterling;Daniel W. Chan;Jonathan I. Epstein;Allyn W. Kimball

  • Proteogenomic and metabolomic characterization of human glioblastoma

    Liang-Bo Wang;Alla Karpova;Marina A. Gritsenko;Jennifer E. Kyle

  • Proteogenomic Analysis of Human Colon Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Opportunities.

    Suhas Vasaikar;Chen Huang;Xiaojing Wang;Vladislav A. Petyuk

  • Targeted Peptide Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Practices for Mass Spectrometry-based Assay Development Using a Fit-for-Purpose Approach

    Steven A. Carr;Susan E. Abbatiello;Bradley L. Ackermann;Christoph Borchers

  • A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range

    William J. Catalona;Alan W. Partin;Martin G. Sanda;John T. Wei

  • National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers

    Catharine M. Sturgeon;Michael J. Duffy;Ulf Håkan Stenman;Hans Lilja

  • Identification of Hepatocarcinoma-Intestine-Pancreas/Pancreatitis-associated Protein I as a Biomarker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Protein Biochip Technology

    Christophe Rosty;Laurence Christa;Scott Kuzdzal;William M. Baldwin

  • Translation of proteomic biomarkers into FDA approved cancer diagnostics: issues and challenges

    Anna K Füzéry;Anna K Füzéry;Joshua Levin;Maria M Chan;Daniel W Chan;Daniel W Chan

Frequent Co-Authors

Lori J. Sokoll
Lori J. Sokoll Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Alan W. Partin
Alan W. Partin Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang Johns Hopkins University
Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Tao Liu
Tao Liu Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Steven A. Carr
Steven A. Carr Broad Institute
Patrick C. Walsh
Patrick C. Walsh Johns Hopkins University
Matthew J. Ellis
Matthew J. Ellis Baylor College of Medicine
H. Ballentine Carter
H. Ballentine Carter Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Amanda G. Paulovich
Amanda G. Paulovich Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn’t always mean following the traditional medical school route. Many healthcare professionals begin or advance their careers through flexible and affordable online programs. For those interested in advanced nursing practice, there are cheapest online fnp program options available, allowing students to earn their Family Nurse Practitioner credentials without a hefty financial burden.

Nurses looking to start or further their education can consider affordable nursing programs online, which make it easier to balance studies with work responsibilities. Transitioning from an RN to a BSN is also attainable through cheap rn to bsn programs, designed for registered nurses aiming to boost their qualifications and earning potential.

For those interested in research or leadership roles, online phd nursing programs provide a pathway to advanced expertise in nursing science and academia. By considering these alternative online degrees, students can find a flexible and cost-effective route to a rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel W. Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles