World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
24549
World Ranking
6269
National Ranking
362

P. Christopher Earley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P. Christopher Earley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

P. Christopher Earley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P. Christopher Earley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

P. Christopher Earley is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their professional background is rooted in an academic environment that supports research and education at a technological university.

There is no detailed information available regarding specific research topics, fields of study, or subfields of study associated with this scientist. Likewise, no data about recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues has been documented, which limits the ability to outline their precise research interests or collaborative networks.

Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards won, which suggests that such contributions, if any, are not documented in the current sources.

This profile reflects the information currently accessible and does not conjecture beyond the documented facts about the scientist's academic engagement or research output.

Best Publications

  • Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.

    Jiing-Lih Farh;P. Christopher Earley;Shu-Chi Lin

  • Culture, self-identity, and work

    Miriam Erez;P. Christopher Earley

  • East Meets West Meets Mideast: Further Explorations Of Collectivistic and Individualistic Work Groups

    P. Christopher Earley

  • Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China.

    P. Christopher Earley

  • Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments

    E. Allan Lind;Ruth Kanfer;P. Christopher Earley

  • Complex interdependence in task-performing groups

    Richard Saavedra;P. Christopher Earley;Linn Van Dyne

  • The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager

    P. Christopher Earley;Randall S. Peterson

  • Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance.

    P. Christopher Earley

  • Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community

    P. Christopher Earley;Cristina B. Gibson

  • A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset

    J. Michael Haynie;Dean Shepherd;Elaine Mosakowski;P. Christopher Earley

  • Redefining interactions across cultures and organizations: Moving forward with cultural intelligence

    P.Christopher Earley

  • IMPACT OF PROCESS AND OUTCOME FEEDBACK ON THE RELATION OF GOAL SETTING TO TASK PERFORMANCE

    P. Christopher Earley;Gregory B. Northcraft;Cynthia Lee;Terri R. Lituchy

  • Multinational Work Teams: A New Perspective

    P. Christopher Earley;Cristina B. Gibson

  • Intercultural training for managers: A comparison of documentary and interpersonal methods

    P. Christopher Earley

  • Culture + Intelligence Old Constructs, New Frontiers

    Kok-Yee Ng;P. Christopher Earley

  • Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting

    P. Christopherr Earley;Terry Connolly;Göran Ekegren

  • Understanding Group Efficacy: An Empirical Test of Multiple Assessment Methods

    Cristina B. Gibson;Amy E. Randel;P. Christopher Earley

  • The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model

    Miriam Erez;P. Christopher Earley;Charles L. Hulin

  • Face, Harmony, and Social Structure: An Analysis of Organizational Behavior Across Cultures

    P. Christopher Earley

  • Comparative analysis of goal-setting strategies across cultures.

    Miriam Erez;P. Christopher Earley

  • Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments.

    P. Christopher Earley;E. Allan Lind

  • New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology

    P. Christopher Earley;Miriam Erez

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Miriam Erez
Miriam Erez Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Cristina B. Gibson
Cristina B. Gibson Pepperdine University
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Gregory B. Northcraft
Gregory B. Northcraft University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
E. Allan Lind
E. Allan Lind Duke University
Harbir Singh
Harbir Singh University of Pennsylvania
Jiing-Lih Farh
Jiing-Lih Farh China Europe International Business School
Detmar W. Straub
Detmar W. Straub Temple University
Soon Ang
Soon Ang Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in psychology, there are a variety of related online degree options and diverse career pathways to consider. Fields such as speech-language pathology are especially popular because they blend psychological concepts with communication sciences, allowing professionals to work with individuals across different age groups who experience communication challenges.

Requirements for these careers can vary by state. For those looking into becoming a speech therapist in Connecticut, specific state credentials and graduate-level education are needed. Likewise, students curious about how to become a speech language pathologist in Delaware must follow detailed certification and licensure steps. In Florida, Florida speech pathologist certification requirements include supervised clinical experience and state-approved exams. Those pursuing the profession in Georgia should review the guidelines for becoming a speech therapist in Georgia to ensure they meet all educational and certification standards.

Online degrees in psychology and related disciplines can offer flexible options for meeting educational requirements, and open doors to rewarding roles in clinical, educational, and healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing P. Christopher Earley

Recently Published Articles