World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
23
Citations
2020
World Ranking
3071
National Ranking
51

J.L. De Boever publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.L. De Boever sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 73 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

J.L. De Boever D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.L. De Boever sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

J.L. De Boever is affiliated with the Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek in Belgium. Their research activity is connected to this institution, which focuses on agriculture and fisheries research.

No specific information is available regarding recent papers authored by J.L. De Boever, including titles, publication years, or venues, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or predominant publication venues linked to their work.

The scientist's documented research fields, subfields, and main topics of study have not been provided, leaving the exact scientific focus areas unspecified.

There are no recorded book publications associated with J.L. De Boever, nor any noted awards or recognitions documented in the available data.

The absence of detailed bibliometric or thematic data limits a comprehensive outline of their research output or influence within their domain.

Best Publications

  • The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants

    J.L. de Boever;B.G. Cottyn;F.X. Buysse;F.W. Wainman

  • Chewing activity of ruminants as a measure of physical structure — A review of factors affecting it

    J.L. De Boever;J.I. Andries;D.L. De Brabander;B.G. Cottyn

  • The Use of a Cellulase Technique to Predict Digestibility, Metabolizable and Net Energy of Forages*

    J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;J.I. Andries;F.X. Buysse

  • Prediction of the feeding value of grass silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy '

    J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;D.L. De Brabander;J.M. Vanacker

  • Carcass and meat quality in double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls and cows.

    L.O Fiems;S De Campeneere;W Van Caelenbergh;J.L De Boever

  • Prediction of the feeding value of maize silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and NIRS

    J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;D.L. De Brabander;J.M. Vanacker

  • Prediction of chemical composition, nutritive value and ingredient composition of European compound feeds for rabbits by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)

    G Xiccato;Angela Trocino;J.L De Boever;L Maertens

  • The use of NIRS to predict the chemical composition and the energy value of compound feeds for cattle

    J.L. de Boever;B.G. Cottyn;J.M. Vanacker;Ch.V. Boucqué

  • Improving ruminal degradability of oil palm fronds using white rot fungi

    Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman;Marta Ribeiro Alves Lourenço;Hasliza Binti Abu Hassim;Jjp Baars

  • Evaluation of Physical Structure. 2. Maize Silage

    J.L. De Boever;D.L. De Brabander;A.M. De Smet;J.M. Vanacker

  • Comparative digestibility of feedstuffs by sheep and cows

    J.V. Aerts;J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;D.L. De Brabander

  • Evaluation of the nutritive value of maize silages using a gas production technique

    J.L. De Boever;Johan Aerts;J.M. Vanacker;D.L. De Brabander

  • Review: pork production with maximal nitrogen efficiency.

    S. Millet;M. Aluwé;A. Van den Broeke;F. Leen

  • Evaluation of Physical Structure. 1. Grass Silage

    J.L. De Boever;A. De Smet;D.L. De Brabander;C.V. Boucque

  • Effect of particle size distribution and dietary crude fibre content on growth performance and gastric mucosa integrity of growing–finishing pigs

    S Millet;S Kumar;J De Boever;Tom Meyns

  • Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: Results of a ring test

    A.H. van Gelder;M. Hetta;M.A.M. Rodrigues;J.L. De Boever

  • The possibilities of near infrared reflection spectroscopy to predict total-phosphorus, phytate-phosphorus and phytase activity in vegetable feedstuffs

    J.L. De Boever;W. Eeckhout;C.V. Boucque

  • An improved enzymatic method by adding gammanase to determine digestibility and predict energy value of compound feeds and raw materials for cattle

    J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;J.M. Vanacker;Ch.V. Boucqué

  • Evaluation of the physical structure of fodder beets, potatoes, pressed beet pulp, brewers grains, and corn cob silage.

    D.L. De Brabander;J.L. De Boever;A.M. De Smet;J.M. Vanacker

  • Degradation of dietary oligofructose and inulin in the gastro-intestinal tract of the rabbit and the effects on caecal pH and volatile fatty acids.

    L. Maertens;Johan Aerts;J. De Boever

  • Microbial protein synthesis in growing-finishing bulls estimated from the urinary excretion of purine derivatives

    J.L De Boever;N Iantcheva;B.G Cottyn;S De Campeneere

  • Upgrading of straw by ammoniation

    B.G. Cottyn;J.L. De Boever

  • Potential of solubility, enzymatic methods and NIRS to predict in situ rumen escape protein

    J.L. De Boever;B.G. Cottyn;J.M. Vanacker;C.V. Boucque

  • The energy and protein value of wheat, maize and blend DDGS for cattle and evaluation of prediction methods

    J. L. De Boever;M. C. Blok;S. Millet;J. Vanacker

  • Comparative digestibility by sheep and cows and consequences on energy value.

    J. L. De Boever;B. G. Cottyn;Ch. V. Boucque;J. V. Aerts

  • The estimation of nutritive value of dairy cattle feed

    B. G. Cottyn;J. L. De Boever;J. M. Vanacker

  • The prediction of forage maize digestibility by near infrared reflection spectroscopy

    J.L. De Boever;J. Van Waes;B.G. Cottyn;C.V. Boucque

  • Prediction of digestibility and net energy of pig feeds by combined NIRS-spectra from feed and faeces

    L. Paternostre;J.L. De Boever;L. Douidah;S. Millet

Frequent Co-Authors

Sam Millet
Sam Millet Ghent University
Richard Ducatelle
Richard Ducatelle Ghent University
Geert Haesaert
Geert Haesaert Ghent University
Veerle Fievez
Veerle Fievez Ghent University
Thierry Gidenne
Thierry Gidenne INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Angela Trocino
Angela Trocino University of Padua
Gerolamo Xiccato
Gerolamo Xiccato University of Padua
Evelyne Delezie
Evelyne Delezie Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek
Juan José Pascual
Juan José Pascual Universitat Politècnica de València
Dirk Reheul
Dirk Reheul Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in animal science and veterinary studies, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities. Psychology plays a key role in understanding animal behavior and interaction, with options available through the cheapest online school psychology programs. These programs can provide essential skills in behavioral analysis that complement veterinary knowledge.

Additionally, mental health and wellness are important in veterinary careers, especially in managing stress and emotional challenges. Accredited programs like online psyd programs accredited offer advanced training that can be pursued alongside animal science education for a multidisciplinary approach.

Counseling also intersects with animal science, particularly in specialized areas such as addiction recovery, where therapeutic methods can support both humans and animals. Students may find value in online addiction counseling degree programs designed to equip professionals with these cross-disciplinary capabilities.

Finally, family dynamics often influence decisions about animal care and welfare. Pursuing a graduate degree in counseling, such as through marriage and family therapy master's programs online, can provide meaningful insights for professionals aiming to improve human-animal relationships within diverse family settings.

Best Scientists Citing J.L. De Boever

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles