World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
43
Citations
6301
World Ranking
3284
National Ranking
36

Dirk Reheul publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Reheul sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 287 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Dirk Reheul D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Reheul sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review

    Yann Devos;Matty Demont;Koen Dillen;Dirk Reheul

  • The positive relationship between soil quality and crop production: A case study on the effect of farm compost application

    Tommy D’Hose;Mathias Cougnon;Alex De Vliegher;Bart Vandecasteele

  • Trees increase soil organic carbon and nutrient availability in temperate agroforestry systems

    P. Pardon;B. Reubens;D. Reheul;J. Mertens

  • Soil biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping, permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping

    Nick van Eekeren;Lydia Bommelé;Jaap Bloem;Ton Schouten

  • Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders

    Marijke Meul;Frank Nevens;Dirk Reheul;Georges Hofman

  • Effect of long-term herbicide applications on the bacterial community structure and function in an agricultural soil.

    Dave Seghers;Kristof Verthé;Dirk Reheul;Robert Bulcke

  • Farm gate nitrogen surpluses and nitrogen use efficiency of specialized dairy farms in Flanders: Evolution and future goals

    Frank Nevens;Frank Nevens;Ignace Verbruggen;Dirk Reheul;Georges Hofman

  • The application of vegetable, fruit and garden waste (VFG) compost in addition to cattle slurry in a silage maize monoculture: nitrogen availability and use

    Frank Nevens;Dirk Reheul

  • Species richness and susceptibility to heat and drought extremes in synthesized grassland ecosystems: compositional vs physiological effects

    L. Van Peer;I. Nijs;D. Reheul;B. De Cauwer

  • The quality of exogenous organic matter: short-term effects on soil physical properties and soil organic matter fractions

    B. L. M. Leroy;H. M. S. K. Herath;S. Sleutel;S. De Neve

  • Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility

    Yann Devos;Pieter Maeseele;Dirk Reheul;Linda Van Speybroeck

  • The long term use of farmyard manure and compost: Effects on P availability, orthophosphate sorption strength and P leaching

    T. Vanden Nest;G. Ruysschaert;B. Vandecasteele;Sabine Houot

  • Long-term effects of mineral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community in agricultural soils

    Dave Seghers;Eva M. Top;Dirk Reheul;Robert Bulcke

  • Validating sustainability indicators: Focus on ecological aspects of Flemish dairy farms

    Marijke Meul;Frank Nevens;Dirk Reheul

  • The application of vegetable, fruit and garden waste (VFG) compost in addition to cattle slurry in a silage maize monoculture: Effects on soil fauna and yield

    Ben L.M.M. Leroy;Lydia Bommele;Dirk Reheul;Maurice Moens

  • Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil P and C levels, crop yield and P leaching in a long term trial on a silt loam soil

    T. Vanden Nest;B Vandecasteele;G Ruysschaert;M Cougnon

  • Alternatives to antibiotic resistance marker genes for in vitro selection of genetically modified plants: scientific developments, current use, operational access and biosafety considerations

    Didier Breyer;Lilya Kopertekh;Dirk Reheul

  • Mineral and organic growing media have distinct community structure, stability and functionality in soilless culture systems

    Oliver Grunert;Emma Hernandez-Sanabria;Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas;Ruy Jauregui

  • Effects of temperate agroforestry on yield and quality of different arable intercrops

    P. Pardon;B. Reubens;J. Mertens;K. Verheyen

  • How can forage production in Nordic and Mediterranean Europe adapt to the challenges and opportunities arising from climate change

    A Ergon;G Seddaiu;P Korhonen;P Virkajarvi

  • Disentangling invasiveness and invasibility during invasion in synthesized grassland communities

    Ann Milbau;Ivan Nijs;Liesbeth Van Peer;Dirk Reheul

  • The nitrogen- and non-nitrogen-contribution effect of ploughed grass leys on the following arable forage crops: determination and optimum use

    Frank Nevens;Dirk Reheul

Frequent Co-Authors

Isabel Roldán-Ruiz
Isabel Roldán-Ruiz Ghent University
Ivan Nijs
Ivan Nijs University of Antwerp
Ann Milbau
Ann Milbau Research Institute for Nature and Forest
Georges Hofman
Georges Hofman Ghent University
Geert Haesaert
Geert Haesaert Ghent University
Maurice Moens
Maurice Moens Ghent University
Kris Verheyen
Kris Verheyen Ghent University
Roel Merckx
Roel Merckx KU Leuven
Anjo Elgersma
Anjo Elgersma Wageningen University & Research
Stefaan De Neve
Stefaan De Neve Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Reheul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles