World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7577
World Ranking
8187
National Ranking
4388

Susan M. Andersen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Andersen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Susan M. Andersen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Andersen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan M. Andersen is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, obesity and health practices, as well as obesity, physical activity, and diet.

The scientist's work spans across several fields with a strong emphasis on psychology, particularly clinical psychology. Additional research interests include pharmacy and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Andersen has contributed to the academic community through publications in various scientific journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • Why Do Women with Eating Disorders Decline Treatment? A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Specialized Eating Disorder Treatment, 2021, published in Nutrients
  • Comparison of prevalence and mental health problems across symptom frequency of self-reported symptoms of binge-eating disorder in a community sample of adolescents, 2023, published in International Journal of Eating Disorders

The collaboration network of Susan M. Andersen features frequent co-authors such as Thea Linkhorst, Frederik Alkier Gildberg, Magnus Sjögren, Katrine Strandberg-Larsen, and Anne Mette Skovgaard.

Publications by Andersen have appeared mainly in the journals Nutrients and International Journal of Eating Disorders, each featuring one of their recent works.

Best Publications

  • The Relational Self: An Interpersonal Social-Cognitive Theory

    Susan M. Andersen;Serena Chen

  • Transference in social perception: the role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations

    Susan M. Andersen;Noah S. Glassman;Serena Chen;Steve W. Cole

  • "Do I know you?" The role of significant others in general social perception.

    Susan M. Andersen;Steve W. Cole

  • Self-knowledge and social inference: I. The impact of cognitive/affective and behavioral data.

    Susan M. Andersen;Lee Ross

  • Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data.

    Susan M. Andersen

  • Transference in Interpersonal Relations: Inferences and Affect Based on Significant‐Other Representations

    Susan M. Andersen;Alana Baum

  • Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception.

    Susan M. Andersen;Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Eliciting facial affect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: Significant-other representations in social relations.

    Susan M. Andersen;Inga Reznik;Lenora M. Manzella

  • Induced hearing deficit generates experimental paranoia

    Philip G. Zimbardo;Susan M. Andersen;Loren G. Kabat

  • The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference.

    Michele S. Berk;Susan M. Andersen

  • Future-Event Schemas and Certainty About the Future: Automaticity in Depressives' Future-Event Predictions

    Susan M. Andersen;Lisa A. Spielman;John A. Bargh

  • Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness

    Susan M. Andersen;Sandra Lipsitz Bem

  • The Working Self-Concept in Transference: Significant-Other Activation and Self Change

    Katrina Hinkley;Susan M. Andersen

  • System Justification in Responding to the Poor and Displaced in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina

    Jaime L. Napier;Anesu N. Mandisodza;Susan M. Andersen;John T. Jost

  • Fundamental Human Needs: Making Social Cognition Relevant

    Susan M. Andersen;Serena Chen;Christina Carter

  • The recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of mental disorders by primary care physicians.

    Susan M. Andersen;Barbara Herr Harthorn

  • Mental representations of the self, significant others, and nonsignificant others: structure and processing of private and public aspects.

    Susan M. Andersen;Noah S. Glassman;David A. Gold

  • Significant Others and the Self

    Susan M. Andersen;Serena Chen;Regina Miranda

  • Traits and social stereotypes : efficiency differences in social information processing

    Susan M. Andersen;Roberta L. Klatzky;John Murray

  • Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect

    Susan M. Andersen;Noah S. Glassman

Frequent Co-Authors

Regina Miranda
Regina Miranda Hunter College
Serena Chen
Serena Chen University of California, Berkeley
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Roberta L. Klatzky
Roberta L. Klatzky Carnegie Mellon University
Geraldine Downey
Geraldine Downey Columbia University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Lee Ross
Lee Ross Stanford University
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Gráinne M. Fitzsimons
Gráinne M. Fitzsimons Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities. One popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is increasingly in demand across the United States. Aspiring professionals should be aware that requirements for this career can vary by state and city, making it vital to understand local certification processes.

For instance, if you want to learn how to become an mft in Pittsburgh, you’ll need to meet specific state education and supervision criteria. Similarly, those searching for how to become an mft in Plano must follow Texas’s distinct licensing and training guidelines. If you’re interested in MFT certification in Florida, the Port St. Lucie mft certification requirements are helpful for understanding local expectations. On the West Coast, you can explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Portland to see Oregon’s standards.

Online programs can provide the flexibility to meet educational prerequisites from anywhere, but always check regional licensing rules before enrolling. This ensures your chosen program aligns with your desired career pathway in psychological practice.

Best Scientists Citing Susan M. Andersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles