World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bram Rochwerg

Bram Rochwerg

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
51073
World Ranking
14342
National Ranking
600

Bram Rochwerg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bram Rochwerg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 456 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bram Rochwerg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bram Rochwerg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bram Rochwerg is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada, contributing extensively to research in the field of medicine. Their primary areas of study include critical care and intensive care medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, emergency medicine, and surgery.

They have a significant body of work focused on critical care and intensive care medicine, with 121 publications in the subfield, alongside 99 publications in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Other notable subfields include epidemiology (81 publications), emergency medicine (77 publications), and surgery (63 publications).

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bram Rochwerg include:

  • Shannon M. Fernando (66 collaborations)
  • Karen E. A. Burns (57 collaborations)
  • Deborah J. Cook (52 collaborations)
  • François Lamontagne (51 collaborations)
  • Ian Ball (38 collaborations)

Publications have been frequently featured in several venues such as:

  • Critical Care Medicine (36 publications)
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (29 publications)
  • CHEST Journal (25 publications)
  • Intensive Care Medicine (18 publications)
  • Critical Care Explorations (18 publications)

Among their recent papers are:

  • "A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19," 2020, BMJ
  • "Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis," 2020, BMJ
  • "Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure," 2020, JAMA
  • "The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline," 2020, Intensive Care Medicine

Best Publications

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

    Andrew Rhodes;Laura E. Evans;Waleed Alhazzani;Mitchell M. Levy

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU

    John W. Devlin;John W. Devlin;Yoanna Skrobik;Céline Gélinas;Dale M. Needham

  • An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline

    Ganesh Raghu;Bram Rochwerg;Yuan Zhang;Carlos A. Cuello Garcia

  • Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

    Bram Rochwerg;Laurent Brochard;Laurent Brochard;Mark W. Elliott;Dean Hess

  • Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Reed Ac Siemieniuk;Jessica J Bartoszko;Long Ge;Dena Zeraatkar

  • A living WHO guideline on drugs for covid-19

    Bram Rochwerg;Arnav Agarwal;Reed Ac Siemieniuk;Thomas Agoritsas

  • Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.

    Starrt-Aki Investigators

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017

    Djillali Annane;Stephen M. Pastores;Bram Rochwerg;Wiebke Arlt

  • Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

    Romina Brignardello-Petersen;Ashley Bonner;Paul E Alexander;Reed A Siemieniuk

  • Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jetan H. Badhiwala;Farshad Nassiri;Waleed Alhazzani;Magdy H. Selim

  • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.

    Holger J. Schünemann;Wojtek Wiercioch;Jan Brozek;Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta

  • Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses

    L. Mbuagbaw;L. Mbuagbaw;B. Rochwerg;R. Jaeschke;D. Heels-Andsell

  • American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

    Shannon M. Bates;Anita Rajasekhar;Saskia Middeldorp;Claire McLintock

  • High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    B. Rochwerg;B. Rochwerg;D. Granton;D. X. Wang;Y. Helviz

  • Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

    Bram Rochwerg;Waleed Alhazzani;Anees Sindi;Diane Heels-Ansdell

  • Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Bruno L Ferreyro;Bruno L Ferreyro;Federico Angriman;Federico Angriman;Laveena Munshi;Laveena Munshi;Lorenzo Del Sorbo;Lorenzo Del Sorbo

  • Effectiveness of therapeutic heparin versus prophylactic heparin on death, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission in moderately ill patients with covid-19 admitted to hospital: RAPID randomised clinical trial.

    Michelle Sholzberg;Grace H Tang;Hassan Rahhal;Musaad AlHamzah

  • Withholding versus Continuing Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers before Noncardiac Surgery: An Analysis of the Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN Prospective Cohort.

    Pavel S. Roshanov;Bram Rochwerg;Ameen Patel;Omid Salehian

  • Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Shannon M. Fernando;Alexandre Tran;Monica Taljaard;Wei Cheng

  • Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) in Critically Ill Patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017

    Annane D;Pastores Sm;Rochwerg B;Arlt W

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Per Olav Vandvik
Per Olav Vandvik University of Oslo
Djillali Annane
Djillali Annane University of Paris-Saclay
Reem A. Mustafa
Reem A. Mustafa University of Kansas
Maureen O. Meade
Maureen O. Meade McMaster University
Roman Jaeschke
Roman Jaeschke McMaster University
Holger J. Schünemann
Holger J. Schünemann Humanitas University
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Robert A. Fowler
Robert A. Fowler Sunnybrook Health Science Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical education doesn't always mean committing to medical school. There are diverse online pathways for those interested in healthcare careers or supportive roles. Several colleges offer programs designed with flexible admission requirements, such as the easiest rn program to get into, which may help students enter the nursing field even with limited prior experience.

For those drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, earning a health care administration degree online can open doors to management roles and higher earning potential, all while allowing learners to balance work or family responsibilities.

Many future healthcare professionals look for accessible nursing schools. Options like enrolling in an lpn school without teas test let students start practical nursing programs without the added pressure of qualifying exams.

If hands-on patient care isn’t your focus, medical billing and coding is a vital, in-demand field. Numerous schools offer programs with financial support, making it easier to get started in this area—check out medical billing and coding financial aid to learn about these opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Bram Rochwerg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles