World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
17257
World Ranking
3053
National Ranking
1480

Mark G. Ehrhart publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Ehrhart sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 156 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark G. Ehrhart D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Ehrhart sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark G. Ehrhart is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Health Professions, with a substantial focus on General Health Professions as well as Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The main topics in Ehrhart's work include:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Community Health and Development
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences Research and Education

Ehrhart has contributed to numerous publications in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Implementation Research and Practice
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Implementation Science
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Implementation Science Communications

Several recent papers co-authored by Ehrhart demonstrate engagement with topics related to implementation science and mental health:

  • "Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS): development and validation of a brief measure of inner context sustainment" (2021), Implementation Science
  • "COVID-related work changes, burnout, and turnover intentions in mental health providers: A moderated mediation analysis." (2021), Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • "Measures of organizational culture, organizational climate, and implementation climate in behavioral health: A systematic review" (2021), Implementation Research and Practice
  • "Eight characteristics of rigorous multilevel implementation research: a step-by-step guide" (2023), Implementation Science
  • "A stepped-wedge randomized trial investigating the effect of the Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) intervention on implementation and transformational leadership, and implementation climate" (2022), BMC Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ehrhart include:

  • Gregory A. Aarons
  • Aaron R. Lyon
  • Jill Locke
  • Marisa Sklar
  • Catherine M. Corbin

This profile highlights Ehrhart's interdisciplinary approach, involving health, psychology, management, and implementation science, which reflects a broad engagement with health professions research. Their publication record shows continuous contributions to advancing knowledge in these areas through diverse collaborative efforts and research outputs across noted peer-reviewed venues.

Best Publications

  • Organizational Climate and Culture

    Benjamin Schneider;Mark G. Ehrhart;William H. Macey

  • Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior.

    Mark G. Ehrhart

  • Understanding organization-customer links in service settings.

    Benjamin Schneider;Mark G. Ehrhart;David M. Mayer;Jessica L. Saltz

  • Work time, work interference with family, and psychological distress.

    Virginia Smith Major;Katherine J. Klein;Mark G. Ehrhart

  • Predicting followers' preferences for charismatic leadership: the influence of follower values and personality

    Mark G Ehrhart;Katherine J Klein

  • An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them.

    Marcus W Dickson;D.Brent Smith;Michael W Grojean;Mark Ehrhart

  • Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach.

    Mark G. Ehrhart;Stefanie E. Naumann

  • The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership

    Gregory A Aarons;Mark G Ehrhart;Lauren R Farahnak;Lauren R Farahnak

  • Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS).

    Mark G Ehrhart;Gregory A Aarons;Lauren R Farahnak;Lauren R Farahnak

  • Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation.

    Gregory A. Aarons;Mark G. Ehrhart;Lauren R. Farahnak;Marisa Sklar

  • Organizational Climate and Culture: An Introduction to Theory, Research, and Practice

    Mark G Ehrhart;Benjamin Schneider;William H Macey

  • Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation.

    Gregory A Aarons;Mark G Ehrhart;Lauren R Farahnak;Michael S Hurlburt

  • Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory

    Mark G. Ehrhart;Karen Holcombe Ehrhart;Scott C. Roesch;Beth G. Chung-Herrera

  • The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Leader Attitudes on Subordinate Attitudes and Implementation Success

    Lauren R. Farahnak;Mark G. Ehrhart;Elisa M. Torres;Gregory A. Aarons

  • The Roles of System and Organizational Leadership in System-Wide Evidence-Based Intervention Sustainment: A Mixed-Method Study

    Gregory A Aarons;Amy E Green;Elise Trott;Cathleen E Willging;Cathleen E Willging

  • Organizational Climate Research: Achievements and the Road Ahead

    Benjamin Schneider;Mark G. Ehrhart;William H. Macey

  • Unit-Level OCB and Unit Effectiveness: Examining the Incremental Effect of Helping Behavior

    Mark G. Ehrhart;Paul D. Bliese;Jeffrey L. Thomas

  • Service Attribute Boundary Conditions of the Service Climate–Customer Satisfaction Link

    David M. Mayer;Mark G. Ehrhart;Benjamin Schneider

  • Be Careful What You Ask For: Effects of Response Instructions on the Construct Validity and Reliability of Situational Judgment Tests

    Robert E. Ployhart;Mark G. Ehrhart

  • Perspectives on organizational climate and culture.

    Benjamin Schneider;Mark G. Ehrhart;William H. Macey

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Benjamin Schneider
Benjamin Schneider University of Maryland, College Park
Cathleen E. Willging
Cathleen E. Willging Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Aaron R. Lyon
Aaron R. Lyon University of Washington
Scott C. Roesch
Scott C. Roesch San Diego State University
Jill Locke
Jill Locke University of Washington
Robert E. Ployhart
Robert E. Ployhart University of South Carolina
Clayton R. Cook
Clayton R. Cook University of Minnesota
Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania
Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a diverse range of online study options. Today, students can access flexible, accredited programs that fit different timelines and budgets. For those interested in social work, finding the cheapest msw programs online can help reduce student debt while gaining essential skills to support communities.

If you aim for a specialized field like behavior analysis, look for bcba accredited programs online. Choosing accredited programs ensures your degree is recognized by employers and licensing bodies.

For those who want to enter the workforce quickly, there are accelerated online msw programs and the fastest psychology degree options. These pathways allow motivated students to complete their education faster, advancing careers in counseling, research, or social services sooner.

Ultimately, online degrees in these areas pave the way to impactful careers in advocacy, education, counseling, and beyond. Exploring affordable and accelerated options helps you find the right balance between quality, credibility, and convenience.

Best Scientists Citing Mark G. Ehrhart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles