World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Radu Ioan Boţ

Radu Ioan Boţ

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 34 2909 2599 38 37 238 4902

Radu Ioan Boţ publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Radu Ioan Boţ between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Radu Ioan Boţ published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 18 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Radu Ioan Boţ: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 5
2004 2
2005 4
2006 9
2007 15
2008 16
2009 20
2010 21
2011 12
2012 20
2013 18
2014 18
2015 18
2016 14
2017 8
2018 17
2019 14
2020 17
2021 9
2022 9
2023 10
2024 9
2025 9
Total 295
Download as CSV

Radu Ioan Boţ publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radu Ioan Boţ sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 237–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 238 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46 238
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Radu Ioan Boţ D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radu Ioan Boţ sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136 34
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Radu Ioan Boţ is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research spans several fields primarily focused on computational mathematics and optimization, with contributions to computer science, mathematics, and engineering.

Their work concentrates on advanced topics such as:

  • Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Numerical Methods in Inverse Problems
  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations

Within academic disciplines, Boţ's research particularly involves:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Artificial Intelligence

Their recent publications include:

  • "Alternating Proximal-Gradient Steps for (Stochastic) Nonconvex-Concave Minimax Problems," 2023, SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • "Fast Optimization via Inertial Dynamics with Closed-Loop Damping," 2022, Journal of the European Mathematical Society (authored by Hédy Attouch)
  • "Extrapolated Proximal Subgradient Algorithms for Nonconvex and Nonsmooth Fractional Programs," 2021, Mathematics of Operations Research
  • "Minibatch Forward-Backward-Forward Methods for Solving Stochastic Variational Inequalities," 2021, Stochastic Systems
  • "Inducing Strong Convergence of Trajectories in Dynamical Systems Associated to Monotone Inclusions with Composite Structure," 2020, Advances in Nonlinear Analysis

Their frequent publication venues illustrate a diverse engagement with mathematical and optimization journals, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mathematics of Operations Research
  • SIAM Journal on Optimization
  • Mathematical Programming
  • Numerical Algorithms

Boţ has collaborated extensively with several researchers. The most frequent co-authors include:

  • Ernö Robert Csetnek
  • Dang-Khoa Nguyen
  • Axel Böhm
  • Michael Sedlmayer
  • David Alexander Hulett

Best Publications

  • Inertial Douglas-Rachford splitting for monotone inclusion problems

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Ernö Robert Csetnek;Christopher Hendrich

  • Conjugate Duality in Convex Optimization

    Radu Ioan Boţ

  • An inertial forward-backward-forward primal-dual splitting algorithm for solving monotone inclusion problems

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Ernö Robert Csetnek

  • A Douglas-Rachford type primal-dual method for solving inclusions with mixtures of composite and parallel-sum type monotone operators

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Christopher Hendrich

  • An Inertial Tseng's Type Proximal Algorithm for Nonsmooth and Nonconvex Optimization Problems

    Radu Ioan Boź;Ernö Robert Csetnek

  • The forward–backward–forward method from continuous and discrete perspective for pseudo-monotone variational inequalities in Hilbert spaces

    R.I. Boţ;E.R. Csetnek;P.T. Vuong;P.T. Vuong

  • A weaker regularity condition for subdifferential calculus and Fenchel duality in infinite dimensional spaces

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Gert Wanka

  • Regularity Conditions via Quasi-Relative Interior in Convex Programming

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Ernö Robert Csetnek;Gert Wanka

  • A Primal-Dual Splitting Algorithm for Finding Zeros of Sums of Maximal Monotone Operators

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Ernö Robert Csetnek;André Heinrich

  • An inertial alternating direction method of multipliers

    Radu Ioan Bot;Ernö Robert Csetnek

  • An alternative formulation for a new closed cone constraint qualification

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Gert Wanka

  • On strong and total Lagrange duality for convex optimization problems

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Sorin-Mihai Grad;Gert Wanka

  • On the convergence rate improvement of a primal-dual splitting algorithm for solving monotone inclusion problems

    Radu Ioan Bož;Ernö Robert Csetnek;André Heinrich;Christopher Hendrich

  • An extension of the variational inequality approach for obtaining convergence rates in regularization of nonlinear ill-posed problems

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Bernd Hofmann

  • Convergence Analysis for a Primal-Dual Monotone + Skew Splitting Algorithm with Applications to Total Variation Minimization

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Christopher Hendrich

  • New regularity conditions for strong and total Fenchel–Lagrange duality in infinite dimensional spaces

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Sorin-Mihai Grad;Gert Wanka

  • The Proximal Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in the Nonconvex Setting: Convergence Analysis and Rates

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Radu Ioan Boţ;Dang-Khoa Nguyen

  • Revisiting Some Duality Theorems via the Quasirelative Interior in Convex Optimization

    R. I. Boţ;E. R. Csetnek;A. Moldovan

  • A Hybrid Proximal-Extragradient Algorithm with Inertial Effects

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Ernö Robert Csetnek

  • Strong Duality for Generalized Convex Optimization Problems

    R. I. Boţ;G. Kassay;G. Wanka

  • On the Relations Between Different Dual Problems in Convex Mathematical Programming

    Gert Wanka;Radu-Ioan Boţ

  • Generalized Moreau–Rockafellar results for composed convex functions

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Sorin-Mihai Grad;Gert Wanka

  • Full length article: Attouch-Théra duality revisited: Paramonotonicity and operator splitting

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Radu I. Bo;Warren L. Hare;Walaa M. Moursi

  • Wolfe duality and Mond–Weir duality via perturbations

    Radu Ioan Boţ;Sorin-Mihai Grad

Frequent Co-Authors

Guoyin Li
Guoyin Li University of New South Wales
Vaithilingam Jeyakumar
Vaithilingam Jeyakumar University of New South Wales
Hedy Attouch
Hedy Attouch University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. Many students consider advancing their education through specialized programs such as a master in data analytics, which leverages strong mathematical foundations to analyze big data and inform business decisions.

For those interested in combining quantitative skills with leadership roles, pursuing an online MBA can be an excellent option. Understanding the transfer credits for online MBA programs can help students save time and money by utilizing previously earned credits towards their degree.

When selecting an MBA program, some may prioritize accessibility. Exploring the easiest MBA to get into provides insight into programs with fewer admission barriers, which can be appealing for students balancing work or other commitments.

Additionally, the rise of flexible schedules makes attending easy online MBA programs a viable pathway for many professionals seeking to enhance their credentials without sacrificing current responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Radu Ioan Boţ

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles