World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
66
Citations
26770
World Ranking
350
National Ranking
191

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
66
Citations
26522
World Ranking
1372
National Ranking
453

Patrick L. Combettes publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick L. Combettes sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 218 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Patrick L. Combettes D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick L. Combettes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mathematical analysis
  • Statistics
  • Algebra

His primary areas of study are Mathematical optimization, Convex optimization, Hilbert space, Algorithm and Monotone polygon. The various areas that he examines in his Mathematical optimization study include Convex function, Image restoration and Inverse problem. In the subject of general Convex optimization, his work in Convex analysis is often linked to Phase retrieval, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His work carried out in the field of Hilbert space brings together such families of science as Range, Sparse approximation, Thresholding and Regular polygon. His research investigates the connection with Algorithm and areas like Convex set which intersect with concerns in Product topology and Parallel projection. His studies in Monotone polygon integrate themes in fields like Mathematical analysis, Resolvent, Combinatorics and Applied mathematics.

His most cited work include:

  • Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces (2553 citations)
  • SIGNAL RECOVERY BY PROXIMAL FORWARD-BACKWARD SPLITTING ∗ (1865 citations)
  • Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing (1537 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Mathematical optimization, Convex optimization, Monotone polygon, Algorithm and Hilbert space. His study in the field of Iterative method is also linked to topics like Signal processing. The concepts of his Convex optimization study are interwoven with issues in Linear matrix inequality and Inverse problem.

The Monotone polygon study combines topics in areas such as Fixed point, Pure mathematics, Duality, Applied mathematics and Monotonic function. His Algorithm research includes elements of Parallel projection, Orthonormal basis, Point and Iterative reconstruction. The concepts of his Hilbert space study are interwoven with issues in Range, Zero, Weak convergence and Composition.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematical optimization (40.82%)
  • Convex optimization (28.98%)
  • Monotone polygon (28.16%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Monotone polygon (28.16%)
  • Convex optimization (28.98%)
  • Regular polygon (14.69%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Monotone polygon, Convex optimization, Regular polygon, Mathematical optimization and Nonlinear system. His Monotone polygon research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Operator splitting, Monotonic function, Pure mathematics and Minification. His work carried out in the field of Convex optimization brings together such families of science as Image recovery, Convex function, Linear combination and Statistical model.

His research in Convex function tackles topics such as Algorithm which are related to areas like Zero. The study of Mathematical optimization is intertwined with the study of Convex analysis in a number of ways. His Nonlinear system study incorporates themes from Fixed point, Affine transformation, Hilbert space and Variational inequality, Applied mathematics.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Asynchronous block-iterative primal-dual decomposition methods for monotone inclusions (51 citations)
  • Deep Neural Network Structures Solving Variational Inequalities (33 citations)
  • Monotone operator theory in convex optimization (33 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mathematical analysis
  • Algebra
  • Statistics

Patrick L. Combettes mainly focuses on Convex optimization, Mathematical optimization, Monotonic function, Algebra and Nonlinear system. His Convex optimization study combines topics in areas such as Fisher information and Addition theorem. Within one scientific family, Patrick L. Combettes focuses on topics pertaining to Regular polygon under Mathematical optimization, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Image recovery and Transformation.

His study explores the link between Monotonic function and topics such as Numerical analysis that cross with problems in Monotone polygon and Operator theory. His Nonlinear system research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Fixed point and Applied mathematics. He interconnects Artificial neural network and Affine transformation in the investigation of issues within Applied mathematics.

Best Publications

  • Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Patrick L. Combettes

  • SIGNAL RECOVERY BY PROXIMAL FORWARD-BACKWARD SPLITTING ∗

    Patrick L. Combettes;Valérie R. Wajs

  • Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing

    Patrick Louis Combettes;Jean-Christophe Pesquet

  • Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces

    Patrick Louis Combettes;Sever Adrian Hirstoaga

  • The foundations of set theoretic estimation

    P.L. Combettes

  • Phase retrieval, error reduction algorithm, and Fienup variants: a view from convex optimization.

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Patrick L. Combettes;D. Russell Luke

  • The Convex Feasibility Problem in Image Recovery

    P.L. Combettes

  • A Douglas–Rachford Splitting Approach to Nonsmooth Convex Variational Signal Recovery

    P.L. Combettes;J.-C. Pesquet

  • Solving monotone inclusions via compositions of nonexpansive averaged operators

    Patrick Louis Combettes

  • A Weak-to-Strong Convergence Principle for Fejé-Monotone Methods in Hilbert Spaces

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Patrick L. Combettes

  • Primal-Dual Splitting Algorithm for Solving Inclusions with Mixtures of Composite, Lipschitzian, and Parallel-Sum Type Monotone Operators

    Patrick Louis Combettes;Jean-Christophe Pesquet

  • ESSENTIAL SMOOTHNESS, ESSENTIAL STRICT CONVEXITY, AND LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS IN BANACH SPACES

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Jonathan M. Borwein;Patrick L. Combettes

  • A proximal decomposition method for solving convex variational inverse problems

    Patrick Louis Combettes;Jean-Christophe Pesquet

  • Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Regina S. Burachik;Patrick L. Combettes;Veit Elser

  • Bregman Monotone Optimization Algorithms

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Jonathan M. Borwein;Patrick L. Combettes

  • A variational formulation for frame-based inverse problems

    Caroline Chaux;Patrick Louis Combettes;Jean-Christophe Pesquet;Valérie R. Wajs

  • A Monotone+Skew Splitting Model for Composite Monotone Inclusions in Duality

    Luis M. Briceño-Arias;Patrick L. Combettes

  • Hybrid projection–reflection method for phase retrieval

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Patrick L. Combettes;D. Russell Luke

  • Quasi-Fejérian Analysis of Some Optimization Algorithms

    Patrick L. Combettes;Patrick L. Combettes

  • Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint

    P.L. Combettes;J.-C. Pesquet

  • Correction to: Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces

    Heinz H. Bauschke;Patrick L. Combettes

  • Primal-dual splitting algorithm for solving inclusions with mixtures of composite, Lipschitzian, and parallel-sum monotone operators

    Patrick L. Combettes;Jean-Christophe Pesquet

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinz H. Bauschke
Heinz H. Bauschke University of British Columbia
Jean-Christophe Pesquet
Jean-Christophe Pesquet CentraleSupélec
Naseer Shahzad
Naseer Shahzad King Abdulaziz University
Massimiliano Pontil
Massimiliano Pontil Italian Institute of Technology
Michel Barlaud
Michel Barlaud Université Côte d'Azur
Hedy Attouch
Hedy Attouch University of Montpellier
Roberto Cominetti
Roberto Cominetti Adolfo Ibáñez University
Charles A. Micchelli
Charles A. Micchelli University at Albany, State University of New York
Yair Censor
Yair Censor University of Haifa
Jonathan M. Borwein
Jonathan M. Borwein University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, there are various related online degrees that can expand career opportunities. A master in data analytics is a popular choice, combining strong quantitative skills with high demand across industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

Graduates seeking leadership roles might consider business-focused programs. The easiest mba programs are designed for working professionals, offering flexible schedules and streamlined admissions without compromising on quality.

Similarly, the easiest mba program options provide accessible pathways for those aiming to enhance management skills alongside their technical expertise.

For those interested in advanced research or executive roles, dba programs offer a doctorate-level education focusing on applied business leadership, which can significantly boost career prospects in academia and industry.

Exploring these related degrees can help Mathematics students tailor their education to fit dynamic career trajectories.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick L. Combettes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles