World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 128 2694 2513 67 59 601 65205

Marco Bianchi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Bianchi between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Bianchi published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 70 publications in 2012. 13 of the 762 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 70. Peak 70 publications in 2012. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 9 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 70 publications 2013: 56 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 52 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
1981 2026

762 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Bianchi: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 3
1986 2
1987 2
1988 3
1989 2
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 1
1994 9
1995 8
1996 3
1997 4
1998 9
1999 7
2000 2
2001 9
2002 9
2003 10
2004 15
2005 12
2006 9
2007 22
2008 16
2009 35
2010 28
2011 34
2012 70
2013 56
2014 54
2015 51
2016 47
2017 26
2018 52
2019 28
2020 28
2021 34
2022 11
2023 15
2024 8
2025 11
2026 2
Total 762
Download as CSV

Marco Bianchi publications per year - data summary

  • Marco Bianchi, a Medicine scholar from Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, has 762 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 70 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1984, 1991 and 1993, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 16.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.6 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 47 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1996: 48 publications (3.0 per year); 1997-2012: 291 publications (18.2 per year); 2013-2026: 423 publications (30.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marco Bianchi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Bianchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 601 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 601
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Bianchi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Marco Bianchi, a Medicine scholar from Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, records 601 publications - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Marco Bianchi, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Marco Bianchi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Marco Bianchi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Bianchi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230 128
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Marco Bianchi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Marco Bianchi, a Medicine scholar from Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, records 128 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Marco Bianchi, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Marco Bianchi ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Marco Bianchi is affiliated with Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Italy, where their research primarily focuses on materials science and physics. Their work spans 78 publications in materials science and 50 in physics and astronomy, demonstrating a cross-disciplinary approach to these fields.

Bianchi's research includes a significant emphasis on subfields such as materials chemistry, atomic and molecular physics and optics, electrical and electronic engineering, electronic, optical and magnetic materials, and condensed matter physics. This combination of specialties reflects a broad interest in understanding material properties at both atomic and applied levels.

Their investigations often concentrate on specific topics including 2D materials and applications, graphene research and applications, topological materials and phenomena, electronic and structural properties of oxides, machine learning in materials science, quantum and electron transport phenomena, and advanced chemical physics studies. These topics highlight the intersection of theoretical and experimental approaches within Bianchi's work.

Frequent collaborators include Philip Hofmann, Davide Curcio, Charlotte E. Sanders, Jill A. Miwa, and Klara Volckaert, with collaborative counts ranging from 14 to over 50 joint works. Such partnerships indicate a collaborative research environment focused on advancing knowledge in their main fields of study.

Bianchi's publications appear in well-regarded venues. The most common venues include arXiv (Cornell University) with 16 papers, Physical Review B with 9 papers, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 4, Nature Communications with 3, and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C with 3 publications. These journals and repositories are frequently selected for disseminating research in physics and materials science.

Their recent papers represent multiple research directions across prominent journals:

  • Proximity Effects on the Charge Density Wave Order and Superconductivity in Single-Layer NbSe2 (2021, ACS Nano)
  • In Situ Exfoliation Method of Large-Area 2D Materials (2023, Advanced Science)
  • A metastable pentagonal 2D material synthesized by symmetry-driven epitaxy (2024, Nature Materials)
  • Paramagnetic electronic structure of CrSBr: Comparison between ab initio GW theory and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (2023, Physical Review B)
  • Ultrafast electronic linewidth broadening in the C 1s core level of graphene (2021, Physical Review B)

Best Publications

  • Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation

    Paola Scaffidi;Tom Misteli;Marco E. Bianchi

  • DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger

    Marco E. Bianchi

  • Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein HMGB1 to redirect it towards secretion

    Tiziana Bonaldi;Fabio Talamo;Paola Scaffidi;Denise Ferrera

  • Cancer cell–autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy

    Antonella Sistigu;Takahiro Yamazaki;Erika Vacchelli;Kariman Chaba

  • The nuclear protein HMGB1 is secreted by monocytes via a non-classical, vesicle-mediated secretory pathway

    Stefania Gardella;Cristina Andrei;Denise Ferrera;Lavinia V Lotti

  • Endogenous HMGB1 regulates autophagy

    Daolin Tang;Rui Kang;Kristen M. Livesey;Chun-Wei Cheh

  • Toll-like receptor 4 and high-mobility group box-1 are involved in ictogenesis and can be targeted to reduce seizures

    Mattia Maroso;Silvia Balosso;Teresa Ravizza;Jaron Liu

  • Mutually exclusive redox forms of HMGB1 promote cell recruitment or proinflammatory cytokine release

    Emilie Venereau;Maura Casalgrandi;Milena Schiraldi;Daniel J. Antoine

  • HMGB proteins function as universal sentinels for nucleic-acid-mediated innate immune responses

    Hideyuki Yanai;Tatsuma Ban;ZhiChao Wang;Myoung Kwon Choi

  • Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1.

    Marco E. Bianchi;Monica Beltrame;Giacomo Paonessa

  • High-Mobility Group Box-1 in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of the Heart

    Martin Andrassy;Hans C. Volz;John C. Igwe;Benjamin Funke

  • HMGB1 promotes recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged tissues by forming a complex with CXCL12 and signaling via CXCR4

    Milena Schiraldi;Angela Raucci;Laura Martínez Muñoz;Elsa Livoti

  • High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein at the crossroads between innate and adaptive immunity

    Marco E. Bianchi;Angelo A. Manfredi

  • A soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is produced by proteolytic cleavage of the membrane-bound form by the sheddase a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10)

    Angela Raucci;Simona Cugusi;Antonella Antonelli;Silvia M. Barabino

  • HMGB1 is an endogenous immune adjuvant released by necrotic cells

    Patrizia Rovere-Querini;Annalisa Capobianco;Paola Scaffidi;Barbara Valentinis

  • Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma

    Tobias Bald;Thomas Quast;Jennifer Landsberg;Meri Rogava

  • HMG proteins: dynamic players in gene regulation and differentiation.

    Marco E Bianchi;Alessandra Agresti

  • DAMPs from Cell Death to New Life

    Emilie Vénéreau;Chiara Ceriotti;Marco Emilio Bianchi

  • The lack of chromosomal protein Hmg1 does not disrupt cell growth but causes lethal hypoglycaemia in newborn mice.

    Sabina Calogero;Fabio Grassi;Adriano Aguzzi;Till Voigtländer

  • Updated Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Essential Importance of Percentage of Positive Cores

    Alberto Briganti;Alessandro Larcher;Firas Abdollah;Umberto Capitanio

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Alberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Andrea Salonia
Andrea Salonia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Nazareno Suardi
Nazareno Suardi University of Genoa
Patrizio Rigatti
Patrizio Rigatti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Giorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Maxine Sun
Maxine Sun Harvard Medical School
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Quoc-Dien Trinh
Quoc-Dien Trinh Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding healthcare careers. For those seeking online options or alternative pathways, there are flexible degrees and certifications that complement or provide alternatives to a traditional medical degree.

Many prospective nurses are interested in direct entry online msn programs, which are designed for graduates from non-nursing backgrounds who want to enter the nursing profession quickly and earn a Master’s degree. Alternatively, if you’re looking for a shorter path into nursing, adn nursing programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) offer a more accessible route and are typically less competitive.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding is a rapidly growing field with strong online learning options. Explore the best online medical billing and coding schools to find accredited programs that offer financial aid.

Some students prefer accelerated learning without the added step of entrance exams. absn programs that don't require teas allow candidates with a bachelor’s degree to obtain a BSN without having to take standardized nursing entrance exams, making the process more streamlined.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Bianchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles