World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
19715
World Ranking
4308
National Ranking
2402

Loren J. Chapman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loren J. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Loren J. Chapman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loren J. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Loren J. Chapman is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The scientist's academic profile is marked by involvement in research and activities linked to this institution.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with this scientist in the available data. Similarly, there are no documented book publications or specific fields and subfields of study listed.

The absence of listed main topics of work, awards, and noted scientific contributions means that the detailed focus areas of their research and scholarly impact cannot be outlined from the information provided.

As the scientist is not deceased, their profile reflects current or ongoing association with academic research. The available information points primarily to affiliation and identity without detailed empirical or bibliographic data.

Best Publications

  • Scales for Physical and Social Anhedonia.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman;Michael L. Raulin

  • Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy.

    Mark Eckblad;Loren J. Chapman

  • Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Body-image aberration in Schizophrenia.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman;Michael L. Raulin

  • Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman;Thomas R. Kwapil;Mark Eckblad

  • Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • The measurement of handedness.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • The measurement of differential deficit

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality.

    Mark Eckblad;Loren J. Chapman

  • Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Illusory correlation in observational report.

    Unknown

  • Physical Anhedonia, Perceptual Aberration, and Psychosis Proneness

    Loren J. Chapman;William S. Edell;Jean P. Chapman

  • A Longitudinal Study of High Scorers on the Hypomanic Personality Scale

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Michael B. Miller;Michael B. Miller;Michael C. Zinser;Michael C. Zinser;Loren J. Chapman

  • The measurement of foot preference

    Jean P. Chapman;Loren J. Chapman;John J. Allen

  • Asymmetrical Brain Electrical Activity Discriminates Between Psychometrically-Matched Verbal and Spatial Cognitive Tasks

    Richard J. Davidson;Jean P. Chapman;Loren J. Chapman;Jeffrey B. Henriques

  • Scales for Rating Psychotic and Psychotic-like Experiences as Continua

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Reliabilities and intercorrelations of eight measures of proneness to psychosis.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman;Eric N. Miller

  • Magical ideation and social anhedonia as predictors of psychosis proneness: A partial replication.

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Michael B. Miller;Michael C. Zinser;Jean Chapman

  • Social anhedonia in the prediction of psychosis proneness.

    Michael Mishlove;Loren J. Chapman

  • The Search for Symptoms Predictive of Schizophrenia.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Facilitation of word recognition by semantic priming in schizophrenia.

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Douglas C. Hegley;Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean P. Chapman
Jean P. Chapman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Donald T. Campbell
Donald T. Campbell Lehigh University
Eileen M. Martin
Eileen M. Martin Rush University Medical Center
Rafael Klorman
Rafael Klorman University of Rochester
Richard M. McFall
Richard M. McFall Indiana University
Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a diverse array of related online degrees and career pathways, especially in the counseling field. Today, many students are choosing flexible online programs to gain skills in areas such as clinical mental health counseling, school counseling, and marriage and family therapy.

If you are exploring your options, it’s helpful to review the popular counseling programs in the US to see which specializations align with your interests and career goals. Certain states also stand out for specific offerings; for example, those interested in the region can discover more through the popular counseling degrees in Utah.

Cost and career outcomes are also important factors to consider. Prospective students should look at rankings like the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Arizona and the best value counseling programs in Colorado, both of which can help you find high-quality and affordable online degrees. Understanding these trends will help you select the right path—whether your goal is direct practice, research, or further graduate study.

Best Scientists Citing Loren J. Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles