World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6755 6295 3659 3326 132 7090

Eileen M. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eileen M. Martin between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eileen M. Martin published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 3 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eileen M. Martin: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 1
1994 4
1995 5
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 4
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 7
2008 3
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 5
2015 14
2016 5
2017 12
2018 6
2019 8
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
2024 1
2025 2
Total 143
Download as CSV

Eileen M. Martin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eileen M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 132
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eileen M. Martin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eileen M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Eileen M. Martin is affiliated with Rush University Medical Center in the United States. Their primary areas of research encompass medicine and psychology, with a focus on infectious diseases, virology, clinical psychology, geophysics, and biological psychiatry. The main topics within their body of work include HIV research and treatment, tryptophan and brain disorders, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, HIV-related health complications and treatments, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, child therapy and development, and counseling, therapy, and family dynamics.

Martin has contributed to several publications spanning a range of disciplines and venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Cognitive Phenotypes of HIV Defined Using a Novel Data-driven Approach," 2022, Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • "Longitudinal 5-year prediction of cognitive impairment among men with HIV disease," 2021, AIDS
  • "Nature relatedness and self-transcendent emotions: A mediational exploration of the role of mindfulness," 2025, The Humanistic Psychologist
  • "Distributed Sensing and Machine Learning Hone Seismic Listening," 2022, Eos
  • "Efficiency evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic strategy combining high throughput quantitative antigen immunoassay and real time PCR," 2023, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Martin include:

  • Robert Paul
  • Kyu Cho
  • Andrew C. Belden
  • Adam W. Carrico
  • Jacob Bolzenius

Martin's work is regularly published in varied academic venues, some of which are:

  • Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • AIDS
  • The Humanistic Psychologist
  • Eos
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

In 2001, Eileen M. Martin was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions.

    Antoine Bechara;Eileen M. Martin

  • Prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

    Ned Sacktor;Richard L. Skolasky;Eric Seaberg;Cynthia Munro

  • Vascular risk factors, HIV serostatus, and cognitive dysfunction in gay and bisexual men

    J. T. Becker;L. Kingsley;J. Mullen;B. Cohen

  • Subcortical brain atrophy persists even in HAART-regulated HIV disease

    James T. Becker;Joanne Sanders;Sarah K. Madsen;Ann Ragin

  • Neurocognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe major depression

    Brian Martis;Danesh Alam;Sheila M. Dowd;S. Kristian Hill

  • Performance of Young Adult Cannabis Users on Neurocognitive Measures of Impulsive Behavior and their Relationship to Symptoms of Cannabis Use Disorders

    Raul Gonzalez;Randi Melissa Schuster;Robin J. Mermelstein;Jasmin Vassileva

  • Cognitive function in women with HIV: findings from the Women's Interagency HIV Study.

    Pauline M. Maki;Leah H. Rubin;Victor Valcour;Eileen Martin

  • Selective Deficit of One Language in a Bilingual Patient Following Surgery in the Left Perisylvian Area

    Estrella Gomez-Tortosa;Eileen M. Martin;Moises Gaviria;Fady Charbel

  • Executive functions among individuals with methamphetamine or alcohol as drugs of choice: preliminary observations.

    Raul Gonzalez;Antoine Bechara;Eileen M Martin

  • Impairments in memory and hippocampal function in HIV-positive vs HIV-negative women: A preliminary study

    P. M. Maki;M. H. Cohen;K. Weber;D. M. Little

  • Factors affecting brain structure in men with HIV disease in the post-HAART era

    James T. Becker;Victoria Maruca;Lawrence A. Kingsley;Joanne M. Sanders

  • Effect of ageing on neurocognitive function by stage of HIV infection: evidence from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

    Karl Goodkin;Eric N Miller;Christopher Cox;Sandra Reynolds

  • Cortical biopsy results in Alzheimer's disease Correlation with cognitive deficits

    E. M. Martin;R. S. Wilson;R. D. Penn;J. H. Fox

  • Cognitive impulsivity and HIV serostatus in substance dependent males

    Eileen M. Martin;David L. Pitrak;William Weddington;Niles A. Rains

  • The influence of executive functions, sensation seeking, and HIV serostatus on the risky sexual practices of substance-dependent individuals.

    Raul Gonzalez;Jasmin Vassileva;Antoine Bechara;Silvana Grbesic

  • The relationship between positive symptoms and instrumental work functioning in schizophrenia: a 10 year follow-up study.

    J.Meg Racenstein;Martin Harrow;Robyn Reed;Eileen Martin

  • Performance of patients with early HIV-1 infection on the Stroop Task.

    E M Martin;L C Robertson;H E Edelstein;W J Jagust

  • Relationship of ethnicity, age, education, and reading level to speed and executive function among HIV+ and HIV– women: The Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) Neurocognitive Substudy

    Jennifer J. Manly;Clifford Smith;Howard A. Crystal;Jean Richardson

  • COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

    William J. Jagust;Bruce R. Reed;Eileen M. Martin;Jamie L. Eberling

  • Impaired decision-making in psychopathic heroin addicts.

    Jasmin Vassileva;Pavlina Petkova;Stefan Georgiev;Eileen M. Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

James T. Becker
James T. Becker University of Pittsburgh
Raul Gonzalez
Raul Gonzalez Florida International University
Pauline M. Maki
Pauline M. Maki University of Illinois at Chicago
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Mardge H. Cohen
Mardge H. Cohen Rush University
Mary Young
Mary Young Georgetown University
Lawrence A. Kingsley
Lawrence A. Kingsley University of Pittsburgh
Lisa P. Jacobson
Lisa P. Jacobson Johns Hopkins University
Martin Harrow
Martin Harrow University of Illinois at Chicago
Eric Carl Seaberg
Eric Carl Seaberg Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, and mental health care. Online learning offers flexibility and accessibility, making it an excellent option for students with other commitments or those seeking career advancement.

Programs in counseling and related fields are now widely available across the USA. If you’re seeking top-quality education, consider some of the best online counseling programs in Texas, known for their academic rigor and supportive faculty. For those prioritizing a more accessible path, you might explore California easiest counseling degrees online or the easiest online counseling programs in Florida, both offering flexible entry requirements and streamlined coursework.

Urban centers like Los Angeles are also prominent for online education, with many students turning to the Los Angeles easiest counseling programs online. Whether you are starting your first degree or pursuing graduate studies, these pathways can lead to roles in school counseling, clinical settings, or private practice, supporting diverse communities and making a positive impact.

Best Scientists Citing Eileen M. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles