World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6762 6494 2415 2243 154 7236

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat between 2005 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat published across 16 years, from 2005 to 2020, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2016. 13 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2016. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications
2005 2020

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat: publications per year, 2005 to 2020
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 10
2007 3
2008 1
2009 6
2010 12
2011 12
2012 7
2013 15
2014 14
2015 13
2016 21
2017 14
2018 12
2019 9
2020 4
Total 154
Download as CSV

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 154
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with specific expertise spanning health, toxicology and mutagenesis, automotive engineering, and environmental engineering.

Their work concentrates on topics related to air quality and health impacts, vehicle emissions and performance, as well as air quality monitoring and forecasting.

Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat has contributed to the field through publications such as:

  • Near-road vehicle emissions air quality monitoring for exposure modeling, 2020, Atmospheric Environment

The scientist has collaborated on research with coauthors including:

  • Jennifer L. Moutinho
  • Donghai Liang
  • Rachel Golan
  • Rodney J. Weber
  • Jeremy A. Sarnat

Their research has been published at least once in the journal Atmospheric Environment.

Best Publications

  • Review of Acellular Assays of Ambient Particulate Matter Oxidative Potential: Methods and Relationships with Composition, Sources, and Health Effects

    Josephine T. Bates;Ting Fang;Vishal Verma;Linghan Zeng

  • Short-term Associations between Ambient Air Pollutants and Pediatric Asthma Emergency Department Visits

    Matthew J. Strickland;Lyndsey A. Darrow;Mitchel Klein;W. Dana Flanders

  • Reactive Oxygen Species Generation Linked to Sources of Atmospheric Particulate Matter and Cardiorespiratory Effects.

    Josephine T. Bates;Rodney J. Weber;Joseph Abrams;Vishal Verma

  • Oxidative potential of ambient water-soluble PM 2.5 in the southeastern United States: contrasts in sources and health associations between ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays

    Ting Fang;Vishal Verma;Josephine T. Bates;Joseph Abrams

  • Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor analytical source-apportionment methods.

    Jeremy A. Sarnat;Amit Marmur;Mitchel Klein;Eugene Kim

  • Ambient pollen concentrations and emergency department visits for asthma and wheeze

    Lyndsey A. Darrow;Jeremy Hess;Christine A. Rogers;Paige E. Tolbert

  • Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta.

    Paige E Tolbert;Mitchel Klein;Jennifer L Peel;Stefanie E Sarnat

  • Associations between Source-Specific Fine Particulate Matter and Emergency Department Visits for Respiratory Disease in Four U.S. Cities.

    Jenna R Krall;James A Mulholland;Armistead G Russell;Sivaraman Balachandran;Sivaraman Balachandran

  • Associations between Ambient Fine Particulate Oxidative Potential and Cardiorespiratory Emergency Department Visits.

    Joseph Y Abrams;Rodney J Weber;Mitchel Klein;Stefanie E Sarnat

  • An examination of exposure measurement error from air pollutant spatial variability in time-series studies

    Stefanie E Sarnat;Mitchel Klein;Jeremy A Sarnat;W Dana Flanders

  • Use of high-resolution metabolomics for the identification of metabolic signals associated with traffic-related air pollution.

    Donghai Liang;Jennifer L. Moutinho;Rachel Golan;Tianwei Yu

  • Factors affecting the association between ambient concentrations and personal exposures to particles and gases.

    Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat;Brent A. Coull;Joel Schwartz;Diane R. Gold

  • Ambient particulate air pollution and cardiac arrhythmia in a panel of older adults in Steubenville, Ohio

    Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat;Helen H Suh;Brent A Coull;Joel Schwartz

  • Fine Particulate Matter Components and Emergency Department Visits for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases in the St. Louis, Missouri–Illinois, Metropolitan Area

    Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat;Andrea Winquist;James J. Schauer;Jay R. Turner

  • Air Pollution and Acute Respiratory Response in a Panel of Asthmatic Children along the U.S.-Mexico Border

    Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat;Amit U. Raysoni;Wen Whai Li;Fernando Holguin

  • The Influences of Ambient Particle Composition and Size on Particle Infiltration in Los Angeles, CA, Residences

    Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat;Brent A Coull;Pablo A Ruiz;Petros Koutrakis

  • A Method for Detection of Residual Confounding in Time-Series and Other Observational Studies

    W. Dana Flanders;Mitchel Klein;Lyndsey A. Darrow;Matthew J. Strickland

  • Ambient air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma: a multi-city assessment of effect modification by age.

    Brooke A Alhanti;Howard H Chang;Andrea Winquist;James A Mulholland

  • Method for Fusing Observational Data and Chemical Transport Model Simulations To Estimate Spatiotemporally Resolved Ambient Air Pollution

    Mariel D. Friberg;Xinxin Zhai;Heather A. Holmes;Howard H. Chang

  • Short-term effects of air pollution on heart rate variability in senior adults in Steubenville, Ohio.

    Heike Luttmann-Gibson;Helen H Suh;Brent A Coull;Douglas W Dockery

  • Exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies: key findings and future recommendations.

    Lisa K Baxter;Kathie L Dionisio;Janet Burke;Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy A. Sarnat
Jeremy A. Sarnat Emory University
James A. Mulholland
James A. Mulholland Georgia Institute of Technology
Paige E. Tolbert
Paige E. Tolbert Emory University
Howard H. Chang
Howard H. Chang Emory University
Armistead G. Russell
Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology
Mitchel Klein
Mitchel Klein Emory University
Matthew J. Strickland
Matthew J. Strickland University of Nevada Reno
Fernando Holguin
Fernando Holguin University of Colorado Denver
Rodney J. Weber
Rodney J. Weber Georgia Institute of Technology
Halûk Özkaynak
Halûk Özkaynak Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many choose programs from the best affordable online general studies degree programs, which provide flexible and cost-effective education options. These programs often allow students to tailor their studies toward environmental topics without excessive financial burden.

When considering degree difficulty, some learners prefer easy bachelor degrees that still offer valuable knowledge and credentials. These can serve as a stepping stone for environmental careers or further specialization.

Specialized degrees like those in geology are particularly relevant, with many colleges offering geology degrees online. These programs equip students with essential skills in earth systems, mineralogy, and fieldwork, all critical for environmental consulting, resource management, and research roles.

Another fast-growing field linked to Environmental Sciences is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Studying a geographic information systems degree trains students in spatial data analysis and mapping technology, skills increasingly sought after in environmental monitoring, urban planning, and conservation projects.

Choosing the right online degree depends on your career goals, learning style, and desired level of specialization. Regardless of the path, these programs provide accessible routes to impactful environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles