World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philippe Goloub

Philippe Goloub

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
France
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
67
Citations
14442
World Ranking
2002
National Ranking
68

Philippe Goloub publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Goloub sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 277 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Philippe Goloub D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Goloub sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in France Leader Award

Overview

Philippe Goloub is affiliated with the University of Lille in France and has contributed extensively to research in environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their publications focus primarily on atmospheric science and global planetary change, with additional work in health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Their research topics cover the following areas:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Air quality and health impacts

They have published articles in multiple scientific venues, notably:

  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Remote Sensing
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmosphere
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their recent papers include:

  • "Combined use of Mie-Raman and fluorescence lidar observations for improving aerosol characterization: feasibility experiment," 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Growth and Global Persistence of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols From the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption," 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "The Potential of GRASP/GARRLiC Retrievals for Dust Aerosol Model Evaluation: Case Study during the PreTECT Campaign," 2021, Remote Sensing
  • "Mobile On-Road Measurements of Aerosol Optical Properties during MOABAI Campaign in the North China Plain," 2021, Atmosphere
  • "Large-Scale Network-Based Observations of a Saharan Dust Event across the European Continent in Spring 2022," 2024, Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Philippe Goloub include:

  • Thierry Podvin
  • Оleg Dubovik
  • Igor Veselovskii
  • Qiaoyun Hu
  • Olivier Pujol

Best Publications

  • Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces from POLDER-ADEOS-1 polarized measurements

    J. L. Deuzé;F. M. Bréon;C. Devaux;P. Goloub

  • Columnar aerosol optical properties at AERONET sites in central eastern Asia and aerosol transport to the tropical mid‐Pacific

    T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck;B. N. Holben;O. Dubovik;O. Dubovik;A. Smirnov;A. Smirnov

  • Polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols: Instruments, methodologies, results, and perspectives

    Oleg Dubovik;Zhengqiang Li;Michael I. Mishchenko;Didier Tanré

  • Climatological aspects of the optical properties of fine/coarse mode aerosol mixtures

    Thomas F. Eck;Thomas F. Eck;B. N. Holben;Aliaksandyr Sinyuk;R. T. Pinker

  • Maritime Aerosol Network as a component of Aerosol Robotic Network

    A. Smirnov;B. N. Holben;I. Slutsker;D. M. Giles

  • Column aerosol optical properties and aerosol radiative forcing during a serious haze-fog month over North China Plain in 2013 based on ground-based sunphotometer measurements

    H. Che;X. Xia;J. Zhu;Z. Li

  • Instrument calibration and aerosol optical depth validation of the China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network

    Huizheng Che;Xiaoye Zhang;Hongbin Chen;Bahaiddin Damiri

  • Remote sensing of aerosols by using polarized, directional and spectral measurements within the A-Train: the PARASOL mission

    D. Tanré;F. M. Bréon;J. L. Deuzé;O. Dubovik

  • Ground-based aerosol climatology of China: aerosol optical depths from the China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network (CARSNET) 2002–2013

    H. Che;X.-Y. Zhang;X. Xia;X. Xia;P. Goloub

  • Aerosol optical depth and Ångström exponent climatology at El Arenosillo AERONET site (Huelva, Spain)

    C. Toledano;V. E. Cachorro;A. Berjon;A. M. de Frutos

  • Large contribution of meteorological factors to inter-decadal changes in regional aerosol optical depth

    Huizheng Che;Ke Gui;Xiangao Xia;Yaqiang Wang

  • Measurement and modeling of the Saharan dust radiative impact: Overview of the Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE)

    D. Tanré;J. Haywood;J. Pelon;J. F. Léon

  • Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces including polarization measurements and application to POLDER measurements

    M. Herman;J. L. Deuzé;C. Devaux;P. Goloub

  • Cloud detection and derivation of cloud properties from POLDER

    J. C. Buriez;C. Vanbauce;F. Parol;P. Goloub

  • Enhancement of aerosol characterization using synergy of lidar and sun - photometer coincident observations: the GARRLiC algorithm

    A. Lopatin;O. Dubovik;A. Chaikovsky;Ph. Goloub

  • Cloud droplet effective radius from spaceborne polarization measurements

    François-Marie Bréon;Philippe Goloub

  • Estimate of the aerosol properties over the ocean with POLDER

    J. L. Deuzé;P. Goloub;M. Herman;A. Marchand

  • Aerosol physical and chemical properties retrieved from ground-based remote sensing measurements during heavy haze days in Beijing winter

    Z. Li;X. Gu;L. Wang;L. Wang;D. Li

  • Results of POLDER in-flight calibration

    O. Hagolle;P. Goloub;P.-Y. Deschamps;H. Cosnefroy

  • Variation of column-integrated aerosol properties in a Chinese urban region

    X. A. Xia;H. B. Chen;P. C. Wang;W. X. Zhang

  • Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France

    Qiaoyun Hu;Philippe Goloub;Igor Veselovskii;Juan-Antonio Bravo-Aranda

Frequent Co-Authors

Didier Tanré
Didier Tanré University of Lille
Oleg Dubovik
Oleg Dubovik University of Lille
Zhengqiang Li
Zhengqiang Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
Maurice Herman
Maurice Herman University of Lille
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Carlos Toledano
Carlos Toledano University of Valladolid
Hongbin Chen
Hongbin Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Victoria E. Cachorro
Victoria E. Cachorro University of Valladolid
Xiangao Xia
Xiangao Xia Chinese Academy of Sciences
Thomas F. Eck
Thomas F. Eck Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students pursue advanced studies, such as accredited eds to edd programs, to enhance their expertise and leadership skills in educational and environmental fields. These programs offer flexibility and high academic standards, ideal for professionals balancing work and study.

Social work and environmental advocacy often intersect, making a dsw program a valuable choice for those aiming to create social change through environmental justice. Online options provide an affordable and accessible route to this impactful career, emphasizing practical skills and community-focused approaches.

For learners seeking a more general foundation, low cost online general studies degree programs can provide essential knowledge applicable to various environmental roles. These degrees can serve as stepping stones to specialized graduate study or careers in policy, management, and communication within environmental sectors.

Additionally, many students opt for the easiest degree to get online to quickly gain credentials that support entry-level positions or career shifts. Combining this with targeted environmental certifications can accelerate professional growth without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Goloub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles