World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 54 4080 3904 140 135 202 9630

Marc Mallet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc Mallet between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc Mallet published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2016. 10 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2016. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc Mallet: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 7
2009 6
2010 8
2011 9
2012 10
2013 12
2014 14
2015 16
2016 24
2017 16
2018 16
2019 12
2020 16
2021 14
2022 4
2023 1
2024 5
2025 5
Total 209
Download as CSV

Marc Mallet publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Mallet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 202 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 202
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc Mallet D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Mallet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198 54
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc Mallet is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia, focusing research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work extensively covers Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional contributions in Environmental Engineering.

The main topics of Mallet's research include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

Mallet has published in several notable scientific journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (6 publications)
  • Geophysical Research Letters (2 publications)
  • Remote Sensing (2 publications)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2 publications)
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques (1 publication)

Recent representative papers authored or co-authored by Mallet include:

  • Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Unexpected Biomass Burning Aerosol Absorption Enhancement Explained by Black Carbon Mixing State, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Overview of aerosol optical properties over southern West Africa from DACCIWA aircraft measurements, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Biomass burning aerosol heating rates from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2016 and 2017 experiments, 2022, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Future evolution of aerosols and implications for climate change in the Euro-Mediterranean region using the CNRM-ALADIN63 regional climate model, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Mallet frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Key co-authors include:

  • Pierre Nabat
  • Y. Shinozuka
  • S. P. Burton
  • Samuel LeBlanc
  • Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer

The breadth of Mallet's work spans detailed observational studies, aerosol optical property characterization, biomass burning aerosol impacts, and climate model applications focusing on regional and global atmospheric processes. The research aims to advance understanding of aerosol interactions and their effects on climate and atmospheric chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean

    X. Durrieu de Madron;C. Guieu;R. Sempéré;P. Conan

  • Observations of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and surface radiation over the southern ocean

    Greg Michael McFarquhar;Christopher S. Bretherton;Roger Marchand;Alain Protat

  • Overview of the Dust and Biomass-burning Experiment and African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Special Observing Period-0

    Jim M. Haywood;Jacques Pelon;Paola Formenti;N. A. Bharmal

  • Dust aerosol impact on regional precipitation over western Africa, mechanisms and sensitivity to absorption properties

    Fabien Solmon;Marc Mallet;Nellie Elguindi;Filippo Giorgi

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

    Jens Redemann;Robert Wood;Paquita Zuidema;Sarah J. Doherty

  • Updated African biomass burning emission inventories in the framework of the AMMA-IDAF program, with an evaluation of combustion aerosols

    C. Liousse;B. Guillaume;J. M. Grégoire;M. Mallet

  • A 4-D climatology (1979–2009) of the monthly tropospheric aerosol optical depth distribution over the Mediterranean region from a comparative evaluation and blending of remote sensing and model products

    P. Nabat;S. Somot;M. Mallet;I. Chiapello

  • The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward

    Paola Formenti;Barbara d'Anna;Cyrille Flamant;Marc Mallet

  • Contribution of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols to the changing Euro-Mediterranean climate since 1980

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Marc Mallet;Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo

  • Direct and semi-direct aerosol radiative effect on the Mediterranean climate variability using a coupled regional climate system model

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Marc Mallet;Florence Sevault

  • Size distribution and optical properties of mineral dust aerosols transported in the western Mediterranean

    C. Denjean;C. Denjean;F. Cassola;A. Mazzino;S. Triquet

  • Microphysical and optical properties of aerosol particles in urban zone during ESCOMPTE

    M. Mallet;J.C. Roger;S. Despiau;O. Dubovik

  • Increasing Arabian dust activity and the Indian summer monsoon

    F. Solmon;V. S. Nair;M. Mallet

  • Impact of dust aerosols on the radiative budget, surface heat fluxes, heating rate profiles and convective activity over West Africa during March 2006

    M. Mallet;M. Mallet;Pierre Tulet;D. Serça;D. Serça;F. Solmon;F. Solmon

  • Modulation of radiative aerosols effects by atmospheric circulation over the Euro-Mediterranean region

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Christophe Cassou;Marc Mallet

  • Overview of the Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment/Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing on the Mediterranean Climate (ChArMEx/ADRIMED) summer 2013 campaign

    Marc Mallet;François Dulac;Paola Formenti;Pierre Nabat

  • LOAC: a small aerosol optical counter/sizer for ground-based and balloon measurements of the size distribution and nature of atmospheric particles – Part 1: Principle of measurements and instrument evaluation

    Jean-Baptiste Renard;François Dulac;Gwenaël Berthet;Thibaut Lurton

  • The 7–13 March 2006 dust storm over West Africa: Generation, transport, and vertical stratification

    Pierre Tulet;Marc Mallet;Véronique Pont;Jacques Pelon

  • Dust aerosol radiative effects during summer 2012 simulated with a coupled regional aerosol–atmosphere–ocean model over the Mediterranean

    Pierre Nabat;S Somot;Marc Mallet;M Michou

  • Radiative and climatic effects of dust over West Africa, as simulated by a regional climate model

    Fabien Solmon;Nellie Elguindi;Marc Mallet

  • Absorption properties of Mediterranean aerosols obtained from multi-year ground-based remote sensing observations

    M. Mallet;O. Dubovik;P. Nabat;F. Dulac

  • Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study

    Marc Mallet;Fabien Solmon;Pierre Nabat;Nellie Elguindi

  • Advanced characterisation of aerosol size properties from measurements of spectral optical depth using the GRASP algorithm

    Benjamin Torres;Oleg Dubovik;David Fuertes;Gregory Schuster

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabien Solmon
Fabien Solmon International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Samuel Somot
Samuel Somot Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Jean-Claude Roger
Jean-Claude Roger University of Maryland, College Park
Catherine Liousse
Catherine Liousse Paul Sabatier University
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Pierre Nabat
Pierre Nabat Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques
Oleg Dubovik
Oleg Dubovik University of Lille
Michaël Sicard
Michaël Sicard Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Karine Sellegri
Karine Sellegri University of Clermont Auvergne
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a multidisciplinary field that offers diverse career pathways. For those looking to expand their expertise, pursuing related degrees online is a flexible and practical option. Programs such as the dsw program highlight how environmental concerns intersect with social work and community advocacy, emphasizing sustainability and social impact.

If you're seeking a broader academic foundation, some of the best affordable online general studies degree programs provide a customizable curriculum, allowing students to integrate environmental topics with other interests, enhancing versatility in the job market.

For those new to higher education or looking for a less intensive route, exploring the easiest degree to get can offer a smoother transition into college-level study while still building foundational knowledge relevant to environmental careers.

Additionally, the demand for specialized knowledge within earth sciences is growing. Online options in geology degrees online provide key insights into soil, water, and natural resource management, complementing Environmental Sciences study and opening doors to geoscience-related roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Mallet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles