World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
9643
World Ranking
2061
National Ranking
987

Michael E. Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 240 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Michael E. Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael E. Smith is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on archaeology, urban studies, and related interdisciplinary fields combining anthropology, economics, and environmental studies.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a diverse range of topics within urban archaeology and the study of ancient settlements. Recent papers include:

  • Cities: Complexity, theory and history, 2020, published in PLoS ONE
  • The persistence of ancient settlements and urban sustainability, 2021, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Definitions and Comparisons in Urban Archaeology, 2020, published in Journal of Urban Archaeology
  • Why archaeology's relevance to global challenges has not been recognised, 2021, published in Antiquity
  • The Low-Density Urban Systems of the Classic Period Maya and Izapa: Insights from Settlement Scaling Theory, 2020, published in Latin American Antiquity

Key frequent co-authors in their research include José Lobo, Frances F. Berdan, Scott G. Ortman, Angela C. Huster, and Abigail M. York.

Michael E. Smith has contributed to several publication venues multiple times. These venues include:

  • Journal of Urban Archaeology
  • Antiquity
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Open Archaeology
  • Journal of Anthropological Research

The scientist has published a book titled Everyday Life in the Aztec World in 2020 with Cambridge University Press.

Their work spans various subfields including Paleontology, Archaeology, Economics and Econometrics, Building and Construction, and Anthropology.

Main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Latin American history and culture
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Best Publications

  • Form and Meaning in the Earliest Cities: A New Approach to Ancient Urban Planning

    Michael E. Smith

  • Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology

    Michael E Smith

  • THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANCIENT STATE ECONOMIES

    Michael E. Smith

  • Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica

    Timothy A. Kohler;Timothy A. Kohler;Timothy A. Kohler;Michael E. Smith;Amy Bogaard;Amy Bogaard;Gary M. Feinman

  • The archaeological study of neighborhoods and districts in ancient cities

    Michael E. Smith

  • The Postclassic Mesoamerican World

    Michael Ernest Smith;Frances Berdan

  • Urban Open Spaces in Historical Perspective: A Transdisciplinary Typology and Analysis

    Benjamin W. Stanley;Barbara L. Stark;Katrina L. Johnston;Michael E. Smith

  • Sustainable agrarian urbanism: The low-density cities of the Mayas and Aztecs

    Christian Isendahl;Michael E. Smith

  • V. Gordon Childe and the Urban Revolution: a historical perspective on a revolution in urban studies

    Michael E Smith

  • Aztec city-state capitals

    Michael Ernest Smith;Marilyn A. Masson;John Wayne Janusek

  • The Earliest Cities

    Michael E Smith

  • Empirical Urban Theory for Archaeologists

    Michael E. Smith

  • Aztec Imperial Strategies

    Elizabeth M. Brumfiel;Frances F. Berdan;Richard Blanton;Elizabeth Hill Boone

  • THE AZTLAN MIGRATIONS OF THE NAHUATL CHRONICLES: MYTH OR HISTORY?

    Michael E. Smith

  • Sprawl, Squatters, and Sustainable Cities: Can Archaeological Data Shed Light on Modern Urban Issues?

    Michael E. Smith

  • The Archaeological Study of Empires and Imperialism in Pre-Hispanic Central Mexico

    Michael E Smith;Lisa M Montiel

  • City Size in Late Postclassic Mesoamerica

    Michael E. Smith

  • The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies

    Michael Ernest Smith

  • Ten Thousand Years of Inequality: The Archaeology of Wealth Differences

    Timothy A. Kohler;Michael E. Smith

  • The Neighborhood as a Social and Spatial Unit in Mesoamerican Cities

    M. Charlotte Arnauld;Linda R. Manzanilla;Michael Ernest Smith

  • The Role of Social Stratification in the Aztec Empire: A View from the Provinces

    Michael E. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Luís M. A. Bettencourt
Luís M. A. Bettencourt University of Chicago
Gary M. Feinman
Gary M. Feinman Field Museum of Natural History
Amy Bogaard
Amy Bogaard University of Oxford
Timothy Earle
Timothy Earle Northwestern University
Xiangru Zhang
Xiangru Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Marina Alberti
Marina Alberti University of Washington
Richard Florida
Richard Florida University of Toronto
Richard Harris
Richard Harris University of Bristol
Samuel Bowles
Samuel Bowles Santa Fe Institute
Arthur N. Popper
Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced studies in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of in-demand career options. Many students are now turning to flexible education paths, such as cacrep accredited programs online, which offer recognized counseling credentials suitable for clinical or community roles.

For those interested in supporting relationships and families, a marriage and family therapy degree online can lead to counseling positions in both private and public sectors. Similarly, pursuing online degrees for psychology allows students to branch into counseling, research, marketing, or human resources.

If you are seeking a broad social impact career, one of the easiest msw online program options can help launch a future in social work, advocacy, or policy analysis. Online study options make it possible to access reputable degrees at your own pace and often at a lower cost, helping you shape a meaningful career while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles