World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 47 2492 2306 196 171 136 10184

Amy Bogaard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy Bogaard between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy Bogaard published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2025. 43 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2025. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 28 publications
1998 2025

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy Bogaard: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 5
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 8
2015 10
2016 14
2017 15
2018 15
2019 23
2020 10
2021 12
2022 14
2023 16
2024 15
2025 28
Total 228
Download as CSV

Amy Bogaard publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Bogaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 136 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194 136
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Amy Bogaard D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Bogaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143 47
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Archaeology

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Agriculture, Archaeology, Crop, Agronomy and Agroforestry. Her study in Agriculture is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Old World and Environmental protection. Her work on Shifting cultivation and Poppy as part of general Archaeology research is often related to Social geography and Settlement, thus linking different fields of science.

Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Land use and Agricultural science. Amy Bogaard interconnects Isotopes of nitrogen, δ15N and Isotopes of carbon in the investigation of issues within Agronomy. Her research in Agroforestry intersects with topics in Animal husbandry and Herding.

Her most cited work include:

  • The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents (1075 citations)
  • The impact of manuring on nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals: archaeological implications for reconstruction of diet and crop management practices (386 citations)
  • Crop manuring and intensive land management by Europe’s first farmers (261 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Amy Bogaard focuses on Agriculture, Archaeology, Crop, Agroforestry and Agronomy. Her study with Agriculture involves better knowledge in Ecology. In the subject of general Archaeology, her work in Herding, Prehistory and Shifting cultivation is often linked to Settlement and Shore, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

Her Agroforestry research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Land use, Domestication, Arid, Agroecology and Subsistence agriculture. Her study looks at the intersection of Agronomy and topics like δ13C with Isotope analysis. Her research in Weed focuses on subjects like Sowing, which are connected to Intensive farming.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Agriculture (46.32%)
  • Archaeology (25.00%)
  • Crop (19.85%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Agriculture (46.32%)
  • Agroforestry (19.12%)
  • Archaeology (25.00%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary scientific interests are in Agriculture, Agroforestry, Archaeology, Bronze Age and Prehistory. Her studies deal with areas such as Period, Economic history, Iron Age and Crop as well as Agriculture. Her Crop study contributes to a more complete understanding of Agronomy.

Her Agroforestry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Mediterranean climate, Subsistence economy, Agroecology and Paleoethnobotany. Her Dendrochronology, Excavation and Herding study in the realm of Archaeology interacts with subjects such as Cultural variation. Her δ15N research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Isotope analysis, Mainland, Ecology and Land management.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia (17 citations)
  • The Preservation and Interpretation of δ34S Values in Charred Archaeobotanical Remains (11 citations)
  • Comparing ancient inequalities: the challenges of comparability, bias and precision (9 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Archaeology

Agriculture, Herding, Bronze Age, Agricultural revolution and Economic history are her primary areas of study. Her Agriculture research includes themes of Period, Iron Age and Economic geography. Her Herding study introduces a deeper knowledge of Archaeology.

Her Archaeology study combines topics in areas such as Range, Fodder and Isotope study. Her studies deal with areas such as δ13C, Agroecology and Hittite language as well as Bronze Age. Her studies in δ13C integrate themes in fields like Agronomy, Manure, Crop and Vegetation.

Best Publications

  • The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents.

    S. Díaz;J.G. Hodgson;K. Thompson;M. Cabido

  • Crop manuring and intensive land management by Europe’s first farmers

    Amy Bogaard;Rebecca Fraser;Tim H.E. Heaton;Michael Wallace

  • The impact of manuring on nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals: archaeological implications for reconstruction of diet and crop management practices

    A. Bogaard;T. H. E. Heaton;P. R. Poulton;I. Merbach

  • Neolithic Farming in Central Europe: An Archaeobotanical Study of Crop Husbandry Practices

    Amy Bogaard

  • Manuring and stable nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals and pulses: towards a new archaeobotanical approach to the inference of land use and dietary practices

    Rebecca A. Fraser;Amy Bogaard;Tim Heaton;Michael Charles

  • Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica

    Timothy A. Kohler;Timothy A. Kohler;Timothy A. Kohler;Michael E. Smith;Amy Bogaard;Amy Bogaard;Gary M. Feinman

  • 'Garden agriculture' and the nature of early farming in Europe and the Near East

    Amy Bogaard

  • Isotope evidence for agricultural extensification reveals how the world's first cities were fed.

    Amy K. Styring;Michael Charles;Federica Fantone;Mette Marie Hald

  • Stable carbon isotope analysis as a direct means of inferring crop water status and water management practices

    M. Wallace;G. Jones;M. Charles;R. Fraser

  • Neolithic agriculture on the European western frontier: the boom and bust of early farming in Ireland

    Nicki J. Whitehouse;Rick J. Schulting;Meriel McClatchie;Meriel McClatchie;Phil Barratt

  • Integrating botanical, faunal and human stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values to reconstruct land use and palaeodiet at LBK Vaihingen an der Enz, Baden-Württemberg

    R. A. Fraser;A. Bogaard;M. Schäfer;R. Arbogast

  • Assessing natural variation and the effects of charring, burial and pre-treatment on the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values of archaeobotanical cereals and pulses

    R.A. Fraser;A. Bogaard;M. Charles;A.K. Styring

  • Calculating a statistically robust δ13C and δ15N offset for charred cereal and pulse seeds

    E. K. Nitsch;M. Charles;A. Bogaard

  • Stable isotopes in archaeobotanical research

    Girolamo Fiorentino;Juan Pedro Ferrio;Amy Bogaard;José Luis Araus

  • An integrated stable isotope study of plants and animals from Kouphovouno, southern Greece: a new look at Neolithic farming

    Petra Vaiglova;Amy Bogaard;Matthew Collins;William Cavanagh

  • Disentangling the effect of farming practice from aridity on crop stable isotope values: A present-day model from Morocco and its application to early farming sites in the eastern Mediterranean

    Amy K Styring;Mohammed Ater;Younes Hmimsa;Rebecca Fraser

  • Questioning the relevance of shifting cultivation to Neolithic farming in the loess belt of Europe: evidence from the Hambach Forest experiment

    Amy Bogaard

  • The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia

    Amy Bogaard;Mattia Fochesato;Samuel Bowles

  • Impact of contamination and pre-treatment on stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of charred plant remains

    Petra Vaiglova;Christophe Snoeck;Erika Nitsch;Amy Bogaard

  • Combining functional weed ecology and crop stable isotope ratios to identify cultivation intensity: a comparison of cereal production regimes in Haute Provence, France and Asturias, Spain.

    Amy Bogaard;John Hodgson;Erika Nitsch;Glynis Jones

  • Towards a social geography of cultivation and plant use in an early farming community: Vaihingen an der Enz, south-west Germany

    Amy Bogaard;Riidiger Krause;Hans-Christoph Strien

  • The effect of charring and burial on the biochemical composition of cereal grains: investigating the integrity of archaeological plant material

    A.K. Styring;H. Manning;R.A. Fraser;M. Wallace

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Hodgson
John G. Hodgson University of Sheffield
Rick Schulting
Rick Schulting University of Oxford
Tim H.E. Heaton
Tim H.E. Heaton British Geological Survey
Richard P. Evershed
Richard P. Evershed University of Bristol
Samuel Bowles
Samuel Bowles Santa Fe Institute
Julia A. Lee-Thorp
Julia A. Lee-Thorp University of Oxford
Gary M. Feinman
Gary M. Feinman Field Museum of Natural History
Harvey Whitehouse
Harvey Whitehouse University of Oxford
Jane Evans
Jane Evans British Geological Survey
Michael E. Smith
Michael E. Smith Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amy Bogaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles