World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5407 5182 99 99 173 15119

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 15 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1991 2025

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 4
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 0
2001 8
2002 2
2003 8
2004 7
2005 9
2006 10
2007 5
2008 8
2009 6
2010 5
2011 5
2012 3
2013 4
2014 11
2015 4
2016 8
2017 8
2018 6
2019 11
2020 15
2021 19
2022 8
2023 9
2024 6
2025 9
Total 208
Download as CSV

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 173
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini is affiliated with the University of Insubria in Italy. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, focusing on various subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their scientific work covers several main topics, such as Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Mediterranean and Iberian Flora and Fauna, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Cryospheric Studies and Observations.

The scientist has contributed multiple articles to outlets that frequently publish their research, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Vegetation Science, Nature Communications, Plant Sociology, and Ecological Indicators.

Recent publications credited to Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini include:

  • Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Global relationships in tree functional traits, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Global plant trait relationships extend to the climatic extremes of the tundra biome, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe's alien and native floras, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset, 2022, Scientific Data

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini has collaborated frequently with several scientists, including:

  • Michele Dalle Fratte
  • Ülo Niinemets
  • Marco Caccianiga
  • Simon Pierce
  • Jens Kattge

Best Publications

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function

    Sandra Myrna Díaz;Jens Kattge;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Ian J. Wright

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome

    Anne D. Bjorkman;Anne D. Bjorkman;Isla H. Myers-Smith;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Signe Normand

  • A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide

    Simon Pierce;Daniel Negreiros;Bruno E. L. Cerabolini;Jens Kattge

  • Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents

    Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy;Sandra Díaz;J. Philip Grime

  • Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship

    Dylan Craven;Nico Eisenhauer;William D. Pearse;Yann Hautier

  • Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation

    Unknown

  • Carbon cycling traits of plant species are linked with mycorrhizal strategy

    J. H. C. Cornelissen;R. Aerts;B. Cerabolini;M. J. A. Werger

  • Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area

    J. G. Hodgson;G. Montserrat-Martí;M. Charles;G. Jones

  • Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants

    Simon Pierce;Guido Brusa;Ilda Vagge;Bruno E. L. Cerabolini

  • Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide

    Carlo Ricotta;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Marco Moretti;Marco Caccianiga

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset

    Unknown

  • Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions

    Ethan E. Butler;Abhirup Datta;Habacuc Flores-Moreno;Ming Chen

  • Forest Filter Effect: Role of leaves in capturing/releasing air particulate matter and its associated PAHs

    Elisa Terzaghi;Edward Wild;Gabriele Zacchello;Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

  • The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification

    Marco Caccianiga;Alessandra Luzzaro;Simon Pierce;Roberta M. Ceriani

  • A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data

    Alvaro Moreno-Martinez;Gustau Camps-Valls;Jens Kattge;Nathaniel P. Robinson

  • Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings?

    J.H.C. Cornelissen;B. Cerabolini;P. Castro-Díez;P. Villar-Salvador

  • Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog?

    J. G. Hodgson;M. Sharafi;A. Jalili;S. Díaz

  • Seed size, shape and persistence in soil: a test on Italian flora from Alps to Mediterranean coasts

    Bruno Cerabolini;Roberta M. Ceriani;Marco Caccianiga;Rossella De Andreis

  • Disturbance is the principal α‐scale filter determining niche differentiation, coexistence and biodiversity in an alpine community

    Simon Pierce;Alessandra Luzzaro;Marco Caccianiga;Roberta M. Ceriani

  • Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain

    Bruno E. L. Cerabolini;Guido Brusa;Roberta M. Ceriani;Rossella De Andreis

  • The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR

    Marco Caccianiga;Alessandra Luzzaro;Simon Pierce;Roberta M. Ceriani

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Pierce
Simon Pierce University of Milan
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences
Jens Kattge
Jens Kattge Max Planck Society
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia
Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia Hasselt University
Sandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz National University of Córdoba
Michael Bahn
Michael Bahn University of Innsbruck
Peter M. van Bodegom
Peter M. van Bodegom Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with social and educational fields. For students interested in the societal impact of environmental policies, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics related to environmental issues.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise through education, various education doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexible options to focus on curriculum development or educational leadership, which are crucial in environmental education initiatives.

Many educators also seek to transition from EdS to EdD programs with online flexibility, making eds to edd programs online an attractive route for advancing in academia or administration while balancing work in environmental sectors.

Additionally, for those interested in community work and policy, fully funded dsw programs online provide pathways to leadership roles in social work with a focus on environmental justice and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles