World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
15119
World Ranking
5405
National Ranking
99

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini is affiliated with the University of Insubria in Italy. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, focusing on various subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their scientific work covers several main topics, such as Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Mediterranean and Iberian Flora and Fauna, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Cryospheric Studies and Observations.

The scientist has contributed multiple articles to outlets that frequently publish their research, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Vegetation Science, Nature Communications, Plant Sociology, and Ecological Indicators.

Recent publications credited to Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini include:

  • Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Global relationships in tree functional traits, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Global plant trait relationships extend to the climatic extremes of the tundra biome, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe's alien and native floras, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset, 2022, Scientific Data

Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini has collaborated frequently with several scientists, including:

  • Michele Dalle Fratte
  • Ülo Niinemets
  • Marco Caccianiga
  • Simon Pierce
  • Jens Kattge

Best Publications

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function

    Sandra Myrna Díaz;Jens Kattge;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Ian J. Wright

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome

    Anne D. Bjorkman;Anne D. Bjorkman;Isla H. Myers-Smith;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Signe Normand

  • A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide

    Simon Pierce;Daniel Negreiros;Bruno E. L. Cerabolini;Jens Kattge

  • Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents

    Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy;Sandra Díaz;J. Philip Grime

  • Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship

    Dylan Craven;Nico Eisenhauer;William D. Pearse;Yann Hautier

  • Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation

    Unknown

  • Carbon cycling traits of plant species are linked with mycorrhizal strategy

    J. H. C. Cornelissen;R. Aerts;B. Cerabolini;M. J. A. Werger

  • Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area

    J. G. Hodgson;G. Montserrat-Martí;M. Charles;G. Jones

  • Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants

    Simon Pierce;Guido Brusa;Ilda Vagge;Bruno E. L. Cerabolini

  • Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide

    Carlo Ricotta;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Marco Moretti;Marco Caccianiga

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset

    Unknown

  • Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions

    Ethan E. Butler;Abhirup Datta;Habacuc Flores-Moreno;Ming Chen

  • Forest Filter Effect: Role of leaves in capturing/releasing air particulate matter and its associated PAHs

    Elisa Terzaghi;Edward Wild;Gabriele Zacchello;Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

  • The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification

    Marco Caccianiga;Alessandra Luzzaro;Simon Pierce;Roberta M. Ceriani

  • A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data

    Alvaro Moreno-Martinez;Gustau Camps-Valls;Jens Kattge;Nathaniel P. Robinson

  • Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings?

    J.H.C. Cornelissen;B. Cerabolini;P. Castro-Díez;P. Villar-Salvador

  • Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog?

    J. G. Hodgson;M. Sharafi;A. Jalili;S. Díaz

  • Seed size, shape and persistence in soil: a test on Italian flora from Alps to Mediterranean coasts

    Bruno Cerabolini;Roberta M. Ceriani;Marco Caccianiga;Rossella De Andreis

  • Disturbance is the principal α‐scale filter determining niche differentiation, coexistence and biodiversity in an alpine community

    Simon Pierce;Alessandra Luzzaro;Marco Caccianiga;Roberta M. Ceriani

  • Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain

    Bruno E. L. Cerabolini;Guido Brusa;Roberta M. Ceriani;Rossella De Andreis

  • The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR

    Marco Caccianiga;Alessandra Luzzaro;Simon Pierce;Roberta M. Ceriani

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Pierce
Simon Pierce University of Milan
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences
Jens Kattge
Jens Kattge Max Planck Society
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia
Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia Hasselt University
Sandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz National University of Córdoba
Michael Bahn
Michael Bahn University of Innsbruck
Peter M. van Bodegom
Peter M. van Bodegom Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with social and educational fields. For students interested in the societal impact of environmental policies, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics related to environmental issues.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise through education, various education doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexible options to focus on curriculum development or educational leadership, which are crucial in environmental education initiatives.

Many educators also seek to transition from EdS to EdD programs with online flexibility, making eds to edd programs online an attractive route for advancing in academia or administration while balancing work in environmental sectors.

Additionally, for those interested in community work and policy, fully funded dsw programs online provide pathways to leadership roles in social work with a focus on environmental justice and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles