World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
13784
World Ranking
5447
National Ranking
443

Petra E. Vértes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra E. Vértes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Petra E. Vértes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petra E. Vértes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Petra E. Vértes is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has an extensive research portfolio primarily situated within the field of Neuroscience. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The recent scholarly output from Vértes includes publications in well-regarded scientific venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Transcriptomic and cellular decoding of regional brain vulnerability to neurogenetic disorders" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "Conservative and disruptive modes of adolescent change in human brain functional connectivity" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The neuropeptidergic connectome of C. elegans" (2023) published in Neuron
  • "Molecular and network-level mechanisms explaining individual differences in autism spectrum disorder" (2023) published in Nature Neuroscience
  • "System-wide mapping of peptide-GPCR interactions in C. elegans" (2023) published in Cell Reports

Vértes's research concentrates on a number of key topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment

They have collaborated frequently with a select group of researchers, including Edward T. Bullmore, Raymond J. Dolan, Rafael Romero-García, Peter Fonagy, and Peter B. Jones, with collaboration counts ranging from 23 to 55 co-authored works.

Vértes has published numerous papers in recurring scientific forums, mainly:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • eLife

The thematic emphases of Vértes's body of work reflect their focus on understanding brain function, neural connectivity, and psychiatric as well as neurodevelopmental disorders, employing diverse methodologies crossing molecular, cognitive, and imaging sciences.

Best Publications

  • Brain charts for the human lifespan

    Unknown

  • Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome

    Kirstie J. Whitaker;Petra E. Vértes;Rafael Romero-Garcia;František Váša

  • Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network

    Nicolas A. Crossley;Andrea Mechelli;Petra E. Vértes;Toby T. Winton-Brown

  • Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter-Individual Cognitive Variation

    Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;František Váša;Maxwell Shinn;Rafael Romero-Garcia

  • Integrated strategy for improving functional connectivity mapping using multiecho fMRI

    Prantik Kundu;Noah D. Brenowitz;Valerie Voon;Yulia Worbe

  • Simple models of human brain functional networks

    Petra E. Vértes;Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Nitin Gogtay;Jay N. Giedd

  • A wavelet method for modeling and despiking motion artifacts from resting-state fMRI time series

    Ameera X. Patel;Prantik Kundu;Mikail Rubinov;P. Simon Jones

  • Cortical patterning of abnormal morphometric similarity in psychosis is associated with brain expression of schizophrenia-related genes.

    Sarah E. Morgan;Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;Kirstie J. Whitaker;Kirstie J. Whitaker;Rafael Romero-Garcia

  • Network control principles predict neuron function in the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome

    Gang Yan;Petra E. Vértes;Emma K. Towlson;Yee Lian Chew

  • The Rich Club of the C. elegans Neuronal Connectome

    Emma K. Towlson;Petra E. Vértes;Sebastian E. Ahnert;William R. Schafer

  • Adolescent Tuning of Association Cortex in Human Structural Brain Networks.

    František Váša;Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;Rafael Romero-Garcia;Kirstie J Whitaker;Kirstie J Whitaker

  • Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients

    Sophie Achard;Chantal Delon-Martin;Petra E. Vértes;Félix Renard

  • The Anatomical Distance of Functional Connections Predicts Brain Network Topology in Health and Schizophrenia

    Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Petra E. Vértes;Reva Stidd;François Lalonde

  • Generative models of the human connectome

    Richard F. Betzel;Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger;Joaquín Goñi;Ye He

  • Transcriptomic and cellular decoding of regional brain vulnerability to neurogenetic disorders.

    Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;Ajay Nadig;Siyuan Liu;Richard A. I. Bethlehem

  • Specific Frontostriatal Circuits for Impaired Cognitive Flexibility and Goal-Directed Planning in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Evidence From Resting-State Functional Connectivity

    Matilde M. Vaghi;Petra E. Vértes;Manfred G. Kitzbichler;Annemieke M. Apergis-Schoute

  • The Multilayer Connectome of Caenorhabditis elegans.

    Barry Bentley;Robyn Branicky;Christopher L. Barnes;Yee Lian Chew

  • Gene transcription profiles associated with inter-modular hubs and connection distance in human functional magnetic resonance imaging networks.

    Petra E. Vértes;Timothy Rittman;Kirstie J. Whitaker;Rafael Romero-Garcia

  • Annual Research Review: Growth connectomics – the organization and reorganization of brain networks during normal and abnormal development

    Petra E. Vértes;Petra E. Vértes;Edward T. Bullmore;Edward T. Bullmore;Edward T. Bullmore

  • CSF1R inhibitor JNJ-40346527 attenuates microglial proliferation and neurodegeneration in P301S mice

    Renzo Mancuso;Gemma Fryatt;Madeleine Cleal;Juliane Obst

  • Correction for Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network

    Nicolas A. Crossley;Andrea Mechelli;Petra E. Vertes;Toby T. Winton-Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Jakob Seidlitz
Jakob Seidlitz University of Pennsylvania
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Ian M. Goodyer
Ian M. Goodyer University of Cambridge
Peter Jones
Peter Jones University of Cambridge
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Aaron Alexander-Bloch
Aaron Alexander-Bloch University of Pennsylvania
Armin Raznahan
Armin Raznahan National Institutes of Health
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Casey Paquola
Casey Paquola Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Petra E. Vértes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles