World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7290 6716 3144 2835 144 13388

Aaron Alexander-Bloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aaron Alexander-Bloch between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aaron Alexander-Bloch published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2023. 58 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2023. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 28 publications
2010 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aaron Alexander-Bloch: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 0
2012 2
2013 5
2014 5
2015 1
2016 4
2017 8
2018 8
2019 7
2020 11
2021 29
2022 31
2023 32
2024 30
2025 28
Total 203
Download as CSV

Aaron Alexander-Bloch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Alexander-Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 144
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Aaron Alexander-Bloch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Alexander-Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Aaron Alexander-Bloch is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research encompasses a diverse range of topics within medicine and neuroscience, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience and advanced neuroimaging techniques.

The main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

The key subfields they contribute to are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Alexander-Bloch's research covers several main topics within neuroscience and medical imaging:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: Patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology," 2021, Neuron
  • "Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth," 2020, Neuron
  • "Intrinsic activity development unfolds along a sensorimotor-association cortical axis in youth," 2023, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization," 2023, NeuroImage
  • "Independent and reproducible hippocampal radiomic biomarkers for multisite Alzheimer's disease: diagnosis, longitudinal progress and biological basis," 2020, Science Bulletin

Frequent co-authors of Aaron Alexander-Bloch include:

  • Jakob Seidlitz
  • Theodore D. Satterthwaite
  • Raquel E. Gur
  • Russell T. Shinohara
  • Ruben C. Gur

The scientist's publications are often found in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Brain charts for the human lifespan

    Unknown

  • Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions.

    Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Jay N. Giedd;Ed Bullmore;Ed Bullmore;Ed Bullmore

  • On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function.

    Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Haochang Shou;Siyuan Liu;Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  • Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: Patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology.

    Valerie J. Sydnor;Bart Larsen;Danielle S. Bassett;Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Aaron Alexander-Bloch

  • Disrupted Modularity and Local Connectivity of Brain Functional Networks in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia

    Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Nitin Gogtay;David Meunier;Rasmus Birn

  • Development of structure–function coupling in human brain networks during youth

    Graham L. Baum;Graham L. Baum;Zaixu Cui;Zaixu Cui;David R. Roalf;David R. Roalf;Rastko Ciric

  • The convergence of maturational change and structural covariance in human cortical networks

    Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Armin Raznahan;Ed Bullmore;Ed Bullmore;Jay Giedd

  • Simple models of human brain functional networks

    Petra E. Vértes;Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Nitin Gogtay;Jay N. Giedd

  • Adolescent Tuning of Association Cortex in Human Structural Brain Networks.

    František Váša;Jakob Seidlitz;Jakob Seidlitz;Rafael Romero-Garcia;Kirstie J Whitaker;Kirstie J Whitaker

  • Child psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study of human brain development.

    Jay N Giedd;Armin Raznahan;Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Eric Schmitt

  • The Anatomical Distance of Functional Connections Predicts Brain Network Topology in Health and Schizophrenia

    Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Petra E. Vértes;Reva Stidd;François Lalonde

  • Impaired Long Distance Functional Connectivity and Weighted Network Architecture in Alzheimer's Disease

    Yong Liu;Chunshui Yu;Xinqing Zhang;Jieqiong Liu

  • Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth

    Zaixu Cui;Hongming Li;Cedric H. Xia;Bart Larsen

  • Normative brain size variation and brain shape diversity in humans

    P. K. Reardon;Jakob Seidlitz;Simon Vandekar;Siyuan Liu

  • Obesity associated with increased brain age from midlife

    Lisa Ronan;Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch;Konrad Wagstyl;Sadaf Farooqi

  • The discovery of population differences in network community structure: new methods and applications to brain functional networks in schizophrenia.

    Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Renaud Lambiotte;Ben Roberts;Jay N. Giedd

  • Default mode network abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: A novel network-restricted topology approach.

    Teddy J. Akiki;Teddy J. Akiki;Christopher L. Averill;Christopher L. Averill;Kristen M. Wrocklage;Kristen M. Wrocklage;J. Cobb Scott;J. Cobb Scott

  • Subtle in-scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI.

    Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Liv Clasen;Michael Stockman;Lisa Ronan

  • Intrinsic activity development unfolds along a sensorimotor–association cortical axis in youth

    Unknown

  • Differential Tangential Expansion as a Mechanism for Cortical Gyrification

    Lisa Ronan;Natalie Voets;Catarina Rua;Aaron Alexander-Bloch

  • Sex-chromosome dosage effects on gene expression in humans.

    Armin Raznahan;Neelroop N. Parikshak;Vijay Chandran;Jonathan D. Blumenthal

  • Childhood Obesity, Cortical Structure, and Executive Function in Healthy Children.

    Lisa Ronan;Aaron Alexander-Bloch;Paul C Fletcher;Paul C Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Theodore D. Satterthwaite University of Pennsylvania
Armin Raznahan
Armin Raznahan National Institutes of Health
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Russell T. Shinohara
Russell T. Shinohara University of Pennsylvania
Jakob Seidlitz
Jakob Seidlitz University of Pennsylvania
David C. Glahn
David C. Glahn Boston Children's Hospital
Jay N. Giedd
Jay N. Giedd University of California, San Diego
David R. Roalf
David R. Roalf University of Pennsylvania
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. For those interested in mental health, behavioral science, or therapy, a range of related online degrees can complement neuroscience or even help shift into a new specialization.

Many students start with a most affordable online psychology degree, providing a solid foundation in cognitive processes and mental health. This is an excellent entry point for those considering further study or professional roles in allied fields.

Others might pursue advanced qualifications such as an msw online programs to become licensed social workers, or explore clinical psychology via a online psy d program. Both routes offer opportunities to make meaningful impacts in communities and clinical settings.

If you’re interested in family dynamics and therapy, investigate marriage and family therapy programs online. Each of these pathways provides unique intersections with neuroscience and mental health, offering flexible online study options tailored to a variety of career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron Alexander-Bloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles