World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3785 3486 2119 1904 147 23265

Anne C. Petersen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne C. Petersen between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne C. Petersen published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1991. 1 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1991. 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1973 2024

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne C. Petersen: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 2
1974 0
1975 2
1976 2
1977 4
1978 2
1979 1
1980 3
1981 2
1982 7
1983 8
1984 9
1985 8
1986 1
1987 5
1988 3
1989 5
1990 9
1991 13
1992 4
1993 6
1994 6
1995 5
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 1
2013 5
2014 5
2015 2
2016 4
2017 2
2018 5
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 157
Download as CSV

Anne C. Petersen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne C. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne C. Petersen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne C. Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne C. Petersen is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. The primary research focus is in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a concentration on several subfields including Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of physiological and biochemical aspects related to muscle function and exercise physiology. Main topics include:

  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Exercise and physiological responses
  • Sports performance and training
  • Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Muscle physiology and disorders
  • Nutrition and health in aging

Recent papers authored or coauthored include:

  • Effects of repeated local heat therapy on skeletal muscle structure and function in humans, 2020, Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review, 2021, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
  • The Paradoxical Effect of PARP Inhibitor BGP-15 on Irinotecan-Induced Cachexia and Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction, 2020, Cancers
  • Metronomic 5-Fluorouracil Delivery Primes Skeletal Muscle for Myopathy but Does Not Cause Cachexia, 2021, Pharmaceuticals
  • Highlighting the idea of exerkines in the management of cancer patients with cachexia: novel insights and a critical review, 2023, BMC Cancer

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Andrew Garnham
  • Craig A. Goodman
  • Michael J. McKenna
  • Metodija Kjertakov
  • Dean G. Campelj

Frequently used publication venues are:

  • The Journal of Physiology
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Journal of Instrumentation
  • Journal of Applied Physiology

Best Publications

  • Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.

    Marcia C. Linn;Anne C. Petersen

  • A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms.

    Anne C. Petersen;Lisa Crockett;Maryse Richards;Andrew Boxer

  • Depression in adolescence.

    Anne C. Petersen;Bruce E. Compas;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Mark Stemmler

  • Adolescent depression: Why more girls?

    Anne C. Petersen;Pamela A. Sarigiani;Robert E. Kennedy

  • Approach and avoidant coping: Implications for adolescent mental health

    Mindy A. Herman-Stabl;Mark Kurt Stemmler;Anne C. Petersen

  • Masculinity, Femininity, and Sex Role Attitudes in Early Adolescence: Exploring Gender Intensification

    Nancy L. Galambos;David M. Almeida;Anne C. Petersen

  • Encyclopedia of adolescence

    Richard M. Lerner;Anne C. Petersen;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

  • Transitions through adolescence : interpersonal domains and context

    Julia A. Graber;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Anne C. Petersen

  • New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research

    Unknown

  • A self-image questionnaire for young adolescents (SIQYA): Reliability and validity studies.

    Anne C. Petersen;John E. Schulenberg;Robert H. Abramowitz;Daniel Offer

  • The protective role of coping and social resources for depressive symptoms among young adolescents

    Mindy Herman-Stahl;Anne C. Petersen

  • Perceptions of the Peer Group and Friendship in Early Adolescence

    Lisa Crockett;Mike Losoff;Anne C. Petersen

  • Girls at puberty : biological and psychosocial perspectives

    Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Anne C. Petersen

  • Pubertal timing and grade effects on adjustment.

    Anne C. Petersen;Lisa J Crockett

  • School Transitions and Adjustment During Early Adolescence

    Lisa J. Crockett;Anne C. Petersen;Julia A. Graber;John E. Schulenberg

  • The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity

    Nancy L. Galambos;Anne C. Petersen;Maryse Richards;Idy B. Gitelson

  • The study of maturational timing effects in adolescence.

    Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Anne C. Petersen;Anne C. Petersen;Dorothy Eichorn;Dorothy Eichorn

  • The Psychological Significance of Pubertal Change

    Maryse H. Tobin-Richards;Andrew M. Boxer;Anne C. Petersen

  • Physical androgyny and cognitive functioning in adolescence.

    Anne C. Petersen

  • Gender-specific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence.

    Phame M. Camarena;Pamela A. Sarigiani;Anne C. Petersen

  • Adolescence and youth

    John Janeway. Conger;Anne C. Petersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University
Maryse H. Richards
Maryse H. Richards Loyola University Chicago
John E. Schulenberg
John E. Schulenberg University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Judith Semon Dubas
Judith Semon Dubas Utrecht University
Nancy L. Galambos
Nancy L. Galambos University of Alberta
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Rainer K. Silbereisen Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Julia A. Graber
Julia A. Graber University of Florida
Sheppard G. Kellam
Sheppard G. Kellam Johns Hopkins University
Lorah D. Dorn
Lorah D. Dorn Pennsylvania State University
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens doors to diverse careers, each with unique advantages. One of what are the benefits of being a psychologist is the flexibility to work in clinical, educational, or corporate settings, making it an appealing choice for those seeking meaningful work and personal growth.

Psychology graduates can pursue roles in mental health, research, education, or business. Learn more about available psychology careers to discover pathways such as therapist, counselor, industrial-organizational psychologist, or clinical specialist.

For those interested in measurement, assessment, and data analysis, psychometrist jobs are a growing field. Review the variety of psychometrist jobs, which blend psychology with statistical expertise for impactful work in education and healthcare.

Choosing an advanced degree can shape your career direction. Understand the difference between phd in psychology and psyd to see which path—research or clinical practice—aligns with your aspirations. A clear understanding of each option helps unlock rewarding and diverse psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anne C. Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles