World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
13698
World Ranking
2606
National Ranking
1049

Peter Adams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Adams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 229 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Adams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Adams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Adams is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily centers on psychology with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology, general health professions, epidemiology, social psychology, and pharmacology.

Their work addresses topics such as grief, bereavement, and mental health; substance abuse treatment and outcomes; global public health policies and epidemiology; sexuality, behavior, and technology; mental health and patient involvement; death anxiety and social exclusion; and gambling behavior and treatments.

Notable recent papers include:

  • A public health approach to gambling regulation: countering powerful influences (2021, The Lancet Public Health)
  • The Need for a Tighter Particulate-Matter Air-Quality Standard (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Policy influence and the legalized cannabis industry: learnings from other addictive consumption industries (2021, Addiction)
  • Connecting theory with practice: Time to explore social reality and rethink resilience among health professionals (2020, International Journal of Nursing Practice)
  • Community Mental Health Care in Aotearoa New Zealand: Past, Present, and the Road Ahead (2022, Consortium Psychiatricum)

Peter Adams has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Marta Rychert, Chris Wilkins, Karen Hoare, Rodrigo Ramalho, and Edwin Sayes. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications in their fields of study.

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in journals such as Addiction, International Journal of Drug Policy, SSRN Electronic Journal, The Lancet Public Health, and New England Journal of Medicine.

In addition to journal articles, Peter Adams has contributed to book publications with Oxford University Press and Utah State University Press eBooks. Titles include Reflecting on the Inevitable (2020) and Teaching Accelerated and Corequisite Composition (2023).

Best Publications

  • Formation and cycling of aerosols in the global troposphere

    Frank Raes;Rita Van Dingenen;Elisabetta Vignati;Julian Wilson

  • Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models

    Peter J. Adams;John H. Seinfeld

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • Global concentrations of tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general circulation model

    Peter J. Adams;John H. Seinfeld;Dorothy M. Koch

  • Sensitivity of PM 2.5 to climate in the Eastern US: a modeling case study

    J. P. Dawson;P. J. Adams;S. N. Pandis;S. N. Pandis

  • General circulation model assessment of direct radiative forcing by the sulfate-nitrate-ammonium-water inorganic aerosol system

    Peter J. Adams;John H. Seinfeld;Dorothy Koch;Loretta J. Mickley

  • Uncertainty in global CCN concentrations from uncertain aerosol nucleation and primary emission rates

    J. R. Pierce;J. R. Pierce;P. J. Adams

  • Ammonia Emission Controls as a Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Atmospheric Particulate Matter in the Eastern United States

    Robert W. Pinder;Peter J. Adams;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Unspeciated organic emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary organic aerosol budget in the United States

    Shantanu H. Jathar;Timothy D. Gordon;Christopher J. Hennigan;Havala O. T. Pye

  • Global evaluation of CCN formation by direct emission of sea salt and growth of ultrafine sea salt

    Jeffrey R. Pierce;Peter J. Adams

  • A Preliminary Synthesis of Modeled Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Regional Ozone Concentrations

    C. P. Weaver;X. Z. Liang;J. Zhu;P. J. Adams

  • Sensitivity of ozone to summertime climate in the eastern USA: A modeling case study

    John P. Dawson;Peter J. Adams;Spyros N. Pandis;Spyros N. Pandis

  • Efficiency of cloud condensation nuclei formation from ultrafine particles

    J. R. Pierce;P. J. Adams

  • Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions

    Rawad Saleh;Marguerite Marks;Jinhyok Heo;Peter J. Adams

  • Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model

    Hong Liao;Peter J. Adams;Serena H. Chung;John H. Seinfeld

  • Global radiative forcing of coupled tropospheric ozone and aerosols in a unified general circulation model

    Hong Liao;John H. Seinfeld;Peter J. Adams;Loretta J. Mickley

  • Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part 1: Aerosol trends and radiative forcing

    E Leibensperger;E Leibensperger;Loretta J. Mickley;Daniel J. Jacob;W.-T. Chen

  • Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates

    J. R. Pierce;J. R. Pierce;P. J. Adams

  • Sensitivity of global tropospheric ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations to climate change

    Pavan Nandan Racherla;Peter J. Adams

  • Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity

    G.W. Mann;K.S. Carslaw;C.L. Reddington;K.J. Pringle;K.J. Pringle

  • Unspeciated Organic Emissions From Combustion Sources And Their Influence On The Secondary Organic Aerosol Budget In The United States

    S. Jathar;T. Gordon;C. J. Hennigan;H. O. Pye

Frequent Co-Authors

Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Patricia A. Fleming
Patricia A. Fleming Murdoch University
Allen L. Robinson
Allen L. Robinson Colorado State University
Jeffrey R. Pierce
Jeffrey R. Pierce Colorado State University
Neil M. Donahue
Neil M. Donahue Carnegie Mellon University
John H. Seinfeld
John H. Seinfeld California Institute of Technology
Merrilyn Goos
Merrilyn Goos University of Limerick
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Philip W. Bateman
Philip W. Bateman Curtin University
Peter J. Irwin
Peter J. Irwin Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse career pathways that often intersect with social sciences and education. For those interested in understanding the societal impact of environmental issues, pursuing accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide a strong foundation. Such degrees emphasize the human dimensions essential to managing environmental challenges effectively.

Advanced studies are also gaining popularity with flexible options like doctoral programs online no dissertation, allowing professionals to enhance their credentials without the traditional dissertation barrier. This format suits environmental practitioners aiming for research or policy roles while balancing work commitments.

Educators looking to specialize in environmental curriculum development or leadership can explore online eds to edd bridge program options. These programs facilitate smooth transitions from master's to doctoral-level education, expanding teaching and administrative opportunities focused on sustainability education.

For social workers specializing in environmental justice or community health, affordable options such as online dsw programs provide critical skills. These degrees prepare graduates to address complex social and environmental systems, promoting sustainable and equitable solutions across communities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Adams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles