World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dominick V. Spracklen

Dominick V. Spracklen

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
90
Citations
27777
World Ranking
596
National Ranking
42

Dominick V. Spracklen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominick V. Spracklen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 274 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dominick V. Spracklen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominick V. Spracklen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Dominick V. Spracklen is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions across related subfields including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, ecology, and pollution.

Their recent published works span high-impact journals and cover diverse topics related to forests, carbon dynamics, deforestation, and atmospheric interactions. Notable papers include:

  • "Tropical deforestation causes large reductions in observed precipitation" (2023, Nature)
  • "Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century" (2022, Nature Sustainability)
  • "Contrasting impacts of forests on cloud cover based on satellite observations" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "Upward expansion and acceleration of forest clearance in the mountains of Southeast Asia" (2021, Nature Sustainability)
  • "Agriculture is the main driver of deforestation in Tanzania" (2020, Environmental Research Letters)

Dominick V. Spracklen frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors. These include:

  • S. R. Arnold
  • Luke Conibear
  • Christoph Knote
  • Carly Reddington
  • Jessica C. A. Baker

Their work is regularly featured in several publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • GeoHealth
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Ecological Solutions and Evidence
  • Nature Communications

Dominick V. Spracklen's research encompasses numerous important topics across environmental science. These include:

  • Air quality and health impacts
  • Conservation, biodiversity, and resource management
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Energy and environment impacts
  • Forest management and policy

This broad range indicates a multidisciplinary approach spanning ecosystem processes, atmospheric interactions, and implications for health and conservation policy.

Best Publications

  • Trees, forests and water : Cool insights for a hot world

    David Ellison;Cindy E. Morris;Cindy E. Morris;Bruno Locatelli;Douglas Sheil

  • Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing

    K.S. Carslaw;Lindsay Lee;C.L. Reddington;K.J. Pringle

  • Particulate matter, air quality and climate: Lessons learned and future needs

    S. Fuzzi;U. Baltensperger;K. Carslaw;S. Decesari

  • Impact of nucleation on global CCN

    J. Merikanto;D. V. Spracklen;G. W. Mann;S. J. Pickering

  • Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests

    D.V. Spracklen;S.R. Arnold;Christopher M. Taylor

  • A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system

    K. S. Carslaw;O. Boucher;D. V. Spracklen;G. W. Mann

  • Oxidation products of biogenic emissions contribute to nucleation of atmospheric particles.

    Francesco Riccobono;Siegfried Schobesberger;Catherine E. Scott;Josef Dommen

  • Global air quality and climate

    Arlene M. Fiore;Vaishali Naik;Dominick V. Spracklen;Allison Steiner

  • Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model

    G. W. Mann;K. S. Carslaw;D. V. Spracklen;D. A. Ridley

  • Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States

    D. V. Spracklen;D. V. Spracklen;L. J. Mickley;J. A. Logan;R. C. Hudman;R. C. Hudman

  • Carbon Mitigation by Biofuels or by Saving and Restoring Forests

    Renton Righelato;Dominick V. Spracklen

  • Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions.

    Axel Metzger;Bart Verheggen;Josef Dommen;Jonathan Duplissy

  • Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint on the global secondary organic aerosol budget

    D. V. Spracklen;J. L. Jimenez;K. S. Carslaw;D. R. Worsnop

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations

    Dominick V. Spracklen;Kenneth S. Carslaw;Markku Kulmala;Veli-Matti Kerminen

  • Black-carbon absorption enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state

    Dantong Liu;James Whitehead;M. Rami Alfarra;Ernesto Reyes-Villegas

  • The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales

    D. V. Spracklen;D. V. Spracklen;K. S. Carslaw;M. Kulmala;V.-M. Kerminen

  • Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles

    Scot T. Martin;Meinrat O. Andreae;Paulo Artaxo;Darrel Baumgardner

  • The impact of Amazonian deforestation on Amazon basin rainfall

    D. V. Spracklen;Luis Garcia-Carreras;Luis Garcia-Carreras

  • A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: I. Model development and prediction of aerosol properties

    D. V. Spracklen;K. J. Pringle;K. S. Carslaw;M. P. Chipperfield

  • Boreal forests, aerosols and the impacts on clouds and climate.

    Dominick V Spracklen;Boris Bonn;Kenneth S Carslaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds
Carly L. Reddington
Carly L. Reddington University of Leeds
Graham W. Mann
Graham W. Mann University of Leeds
Kirsty J. Pringle
Kirsty J. Pringle University of Leeds
Alexandru Rap
Alexandru Rap University of Leeds
Steve R. Arnold
Steve R. Arnold University of Leeds
Piers M. Forster
Piers M. Forster University of Leeds
Jeffrey R. Pierce
Jeffrey R. Pierce Colorado State University
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many opt for a geology degree, which complements environmental studies by focusing on earth processes and natural resource management. To find programs that fit different needs, checking out the online geology degree options is a smart starting point.

Another growing field linked to Environmental Sciences is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). GIS professionals analyze spatial data to address environmental challenges, making expertise in this area highly valuable. Prospective students can explore the best GIS programs to identify quality online pathways.

Those seeking flexibility might consider degree programs known for accessibility and manageable coursework. According to studies on the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get, certain environmental and earth science programs rank as approachable choices without sacrificing career prospects.

For professionals aiming to advance into leadership or policy roles within environmental sectors, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be invaluable. Many students find accelerated paths through the best online MPA programs, which offer specialized training to influence environmental policy and management.

Best Scientists Citing Dominick V. Spracklen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles