World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6105 5676 619 587 133 10881

Angela J. Fawcett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angela J. Fawcett between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angela J. Fawcett published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2008. 3 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2008. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angela J. Fawcett: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 5
1992 4
1993 7
1994 4
1995 5
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 5
2001 7
2002 6
2003 6
2004 9
2005 3
2006 3
2007 6
2008 21
2009 2
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 2
2015 0
2016 2
2017 5
2018 0
2019 3
2020 5
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 143
Download as CSV

Angela J. Fawcett publications per year - data summary

  • Angela J. Fawcett, a Psychology scholar from Swansea University, has 143 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990, 1996, 2012 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (2015 and 2018).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.2 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 12 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 49 publications (4.1 per year); 2002-2013: 65 publications (5.4 per year); 2014-2025: 29 publications (2.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Angela J. Fawcett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela J. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Angela J. Fawcett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Angela J. Fawcett, a Psychology scholar from Swansea University, records 133 publications - the 40th percentile of the discipline.
  • 40% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Angela J. Fawcett, and about 60% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Angela J. Fawcett ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Angela J. Fawcett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela J. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Angela J. Fawcett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Angela J. Fawcett, a Psychology scholar from Swansea University, records 47 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Angela J. Fawcett, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Angela J. Fawcett ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Angela J. Fawcett is affiliated with Swansea University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology with a specialization in developmental and educational psychology. The scientist's work also intersects with statistics and probability, cognitive neuroscience, education, and language and linguistics.

Their research covers key topics that include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Writing and Handwriting Education
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Frequent publication venues where Angela J. Fawcett's research appears include:

  • Asia Pacific Journal of Developmental Differences
  • Dyslexia
  • BMC Neuroscience
  • Brain Sciences
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Recent papers authored by or coauthored with Angela J. Fawcett demonstrate a focus on cognitive processes and developmental disorders such as dyslexia. Notable publications include:

  • Evaluating a new verbal working memory-balance program: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial study on Iranian children with dyslexia, 2021, BMC Neuroscience
  • Verbal Working Memory-Balance program training alters the left fusiform gyrus resting-state functional connectivity: A randomized clinical trial study on children with dyslexia, 2023, Dyslexia
  • Cognitive-Motor Training Improves Reading-Related Executive Functions: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study in Dyslexia, 2024, Brain Sciences
  • Decoding and word recognition in English as a native and a foreign language in students with and without dyslexia (English vs. Polish students), 2020, Dyslexia
  • Mathematics Disability vs. Learning Disability: A 360 Degree Analysis, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Angela J. Fawcett frequently collaborates with various coauthors, including:

  • Mehdi Ramezani
  • Saeed Behzadipour
  • Mohammad Taghi Joghataei
  • Ehsan Pourghayoomi
  • Elham Shirazi

Best Publications

  • Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis

    Roderick I Nicolson;Angela J Fawcett;Paul Dean

  • Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research?

    R.I. Nicolson;A.J. Fawcett

  • Consensus Paper: Language and the Cerebellum: an Ongoing Enigma

    Peter Mariën;Herman Ackermann;Michael Adamaszek;Caroline H S Barwood

  • Association of abnormal cerebellar activation with motor learning difficulties in dyslexic adults

    Roderick I Nicolson;Angela J Fawcett;Emma L Berry;I Harri Jenkins

  • Procedural learning difficulties: reuniting the developmental disorders?

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett

  • Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks.

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson;Paul Dean

  • Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum.

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett

  • Time estimation deficits in developmental dyslexia: evidence of cerebellar involvement

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett;Paul Dean

  • Dyslexia and music: measuring musical timing skills

    Katie Overy;Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett;Eric F. Clarke

  • Reaction times and dyslexia

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett

  • Performance of Dyslexic Children on Cerebellar and Cognitive Tests.

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson

  • Naming Speed in Children with Dyslexia

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson

  • Comparison of deficits in cognitive and motor skills among children with dyslexia

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett

  • Dyslexia, development and the cerebellum.

    R. I. Nicolson;A. J. Fawcett;P. Dean

  • Dyslexia, Learning, and the Brain

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela Fawcett

  • Persistent Deficits in Motor Skill of Children with Dyslexia

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson

  • Automatisation deficits in balance for dyslexic children.

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson

  • Dyslexia: The Role of the Cerebellum

    Angela J. Fawcett;Roderick I. Nicolson

  • Developmental dyslexia: The role of the cerebellum

    Roderick I. Nicolson;Angela J. Fawcett

  • Investigating the central executive in adult dyslexics: Evidence from phonological and visuospatial working memory performance

    James Smith-Spark;John Fisk;Angela Fawcett;Roderick Nicolson

Frequent Co-Authors

Roderick I. Nicolson
Roderick I. Nicolson Edge Hill University
Paul Dean
Paul Dean University of Sheffield
Catherine J. Stoodley
Catherine J. Stoodley American University
John F. Stein
John F. Stein University of Oxford
Emmanuel M. Pothos
Emmanuel M. Pothos City, University of London
Malka Margalit
Malka Margalit Tel Aviv University
Irene Daum
Irene Daum Ruhr University Bochum
Bruce E. Murdoch
Bruce E. Murdoch University of Queensland
Alan D. Baddeley
Alan D. Baddeley University of York
Georgios D. Sideridis
Georgios D. Sideridis Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up a range of educational and professional options. Many students gravitate toward counseling, with substance abuse counseling emerging as a high-demand field across the country. Online psychology degrees can be an accessible first step, providing flexible pathways into this vital profession.

Exploring how to become a substance abuse counselor in Portland can give you an overview of the licensing requirements and training involved. Different regions have unique standards; for example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Raleigh must meet North Carolina's guidelines for education and clinical experience.

Likewise, the steps to becoming a substance abuse counselor in Reno outline specific Nevada state qualifications, while the Richmond substance abuse counselor certification requirements highlight Virginia's processes—including background checks and supervised fieldwork.

By studying these regional requirements, you can better plan your educational journey and select online degrees that match targeted career outcomes. This research is crucial as you map out your future in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Angela J. Fawcett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles