World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William H. Hendershot

William H. Hendershot

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
11313
World Ranking
6273
National Ranking
272

William H. Hendershot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Hendershot sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

William H. Hendershot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William H. Hendershot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

William H. Hendershot is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their academic profile shows involvement in research activities associated with this institution.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recurring publication venues listed for William H. Hendershot. Similarly, no book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or specific research topics have been documented.

No awards or honors have been recorded for this scientist. The available data indicates that William H. Hendershot is currently active in their professional capacity.

Best Publications

  • Solid-Solution Partitioning of Metals in Contaminated Soils: Dependence on pH, Total Metal Burden, and Organic Matter

    Sébastien Sauvé;William Hendershot;Herbert E. Allen

  • A simple barium chloride method for determining cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations

    William H. Hendershot;Martin Duquette

  • Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils

    M. McBRIDE;S. Sauve;W. Hendershot

  • Soil Reaction and Exchangeable Acidity

    Unknown

  • Copper solubility and speciation of in situ contaminated soils : Effects of copper level, pH and organic matter

    Sébastien Sauvé;Murray B. McBride;Wendell A. Norvell;William H. Hendershot

  • Speciation and Complexation of Cadmium in Extracted Soil Solutions

    Sébastien Sauvé;Wendell A. Norvell;Murray McBride;William Hendershot

  • Soil solution speciation of lead(II): effects of organic matter and pH

    Sébastien Sauvé;Murray McBride;William Hendershot

  • Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils.

    Unknown

  • Derivation of soil quality criteria using predicted chemical speciation of Pb2+ and Cu2+

    Sébastien Sauvé;Alain Dumestre;Murray McBride;William Hendershot

  • Speciation of Lead in Contaminated Soils

    Sébastien Sauvé;Murray B. McBride;William H. Hendershot

  • Linking plant tissue concentrations and soil copper pools in urban contaminated soils

    Sébastien Sauvé;Nicola Cook;William H. Hendershot;Murray B. McBride

  • No-tillage and manure applications increase aggregation and improve nutrient retention in a sandy-loam soil

    You Jiao;Joann K. Whalen;William H. Hendershot

  • Adsorption of Free Lead (Pb2+) by Pedogenic Oxides, Ferrihydrite, and Leaf Compost

    Sébastien Sauvé;Carmen Enid Mart ı ´ nez;Murray McBride;William Hendershot

  • Recycling EDTA solutions used to remediate metal-polluted soils.

    Q.R. Zeng;S. Sauvé;H.E. Allen;W.H. Hendershot

  • Uptake of trace metals by the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris L. in urban contaminated soils

    Debra Kennette;William Hendershot;Alan Tomlin;Sébastien Sauvé

  • The effects of antecedent moisture conditions on the relationship of hydrology to hydrochemistry in a small forested watershed

    Pascale M. Biron;André G. Roy;François Courschesne;William H. Hendershot

  • Lead Phosphate Solubility in Water and Soil Suspensions

    Sébastien Sauvé;Murray McBride;William Hendershot

  • Soil Properties Controlling the Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Carbon to Mineral Soils

    D. N. Kothawala;T. R. Moore;W. H. Hendershot

  • Ion-selective electrode measurements of copper(II) activity in contaminated soils

    S. Sauvé;S. Sauvé;M. B. McBride;W. H. Hendershot

  • Earthworm Sublethal Responses to Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterial in Soil Detected by 1H NMR Metabolomics

    Melissa L. Whitfield Åslund;Heather McShane;Myrna J. Simpson;André J. Simpson

  • Removal of trace metals from contaminated soils using EDTA incorporating resin trapping techniques

    R.S Tejowulan;W.H Hendershot

  • Phosphate Sorption and Release in a Sandy-Loam Soil as Influenced by Fertilizer Sources

    You Jiao;Joann K. Whalen;William H. Hendershot

  • Reproductive and behavioral responses of earthworms exposed to nano‐sized titanium dioxide in soil

    Heather McShane;Manon Sarrazin;Joann K. Whalen;William H. Hendershot

  • The biotic ligand model for plants and metals: Technical challenges for field application†

    Paula M. C. Antunes;Edward J. Berkelaar;David Boyle;Beverley A. Hale

Frequent Co-Authors

Sébastien Sauvé
Sébastien Sauvé University of Montreal
James W. Fyles
James W. Fyles McGill University
Joann K. Whalen
Joann K. Whalen McGill University
Murray B. McBride
Murray B. McBride Cornell University
Geoffrey I. Sunahara
Geoffrey I. Sunahara McGill University
André G. Roy
André G. Roy Concordia University
Pascale M. Biron
Pascale M. Biron Concordia University
Shiv O. Prasher
Shiv O. Prasher McGill University
Chandra A. Madramootoo
Chandra A. Madramootoo McGill University
David Paré
David Paré Natural Resources Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. For example, pursuing an cheapest dsw program might appeal to individuals passionate about environmental social work and community advocacy.

Similarly, an online general studies degree affordable option offers flexibility for students wanting to mix environmental topics with other areas of interest, creating a customized learning experience.

For those seeking a less intensive academic path, understanding the easiest degree to get can help balance career goals with personal circumstances while still gaining relevant knowledge for the environmental sector.

Lastly, specialized fields such as geology are directly relevant to Environmental Sciences. Online options like the online geology degrees provide rigorous training in earth sciences, which is crucial for tackling environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing William H. Hendershot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles