World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10947 10244 532 523 124 4047

Thomas Lachmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Lachmann between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Lachmann published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 33 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 20 publications
1995 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Lachmann: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 7
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 0
2007 6
2008 6
2009 6
2010 6
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 11
2015 5
2016 5
2017 6
2018 19
2019 9
2020 6
2021 15
2022 17
2023 15
2024 13
2025 20
Total 193
Download as CSV

Thomas Lachmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 124
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Lachmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lachmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Lachmann is affiliated with the Technical University of Kaiserslautern in Germany. Their research spans across the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, and Education.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Thomas Lachmann has contributed scholarly articles to several publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
  • Scientific Reports
  • NOISE-CON proceedings
  • AHFE international
  • Biological Psychology

Their notable recent papers include:

  • "Multimodal Natural Human-Computer Interfaces for Computer-Aided Design: A Review Paper," 2022, Applied Sciences
  • "Performance differences between instructions on paper vs digital glasses for a simple assembly task," 2021, Applied Ergonomics
  • "Protective effect of restorative possibilities on cognitive function and mental health in children and adolescents: A scoping review including the role of physical activity," 2023, Environmental Research
  • "Implementation of AI Technologies in manufacturing - success factors and challenges," 2022, AHFE international
  • "Creativity across the lifespan: changes with age and with dementia," 2023, BMC Geriatrics

Frequent collaborators include Jan Spilski, Maria Klatte, Daniela Czernochowski, Kirstin Bergström, and Ann-Kathrin Beck. These coauthors have worked with Lachmann extensively, contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children

    Maria Klatte;Kirstin Bergström;Thomas Lachmann

  • Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting

    Maria Klatte;Thomas Lachmann;Markus Meis

  • Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes

    Thomas Lachmann;Stefan Berti;Teija Kujala;Erich Schröger

  • Does mental rotation require central mechanisms

    Eric Ruthruff;Jeff Miller;Thomas Lachmann

  • Distinguishing cause from effect – many deficits associated with developmental dyslexia may be a consequence of reduced and suboptimal reading experience

    Falk Huettig;Thomas Lachmann;Alexandra Reis;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson

  • The irrelevant sound effect in short-term memory: Is there developmental change?

    Maria Klatte;Thomas Lachmann;Sabine Schlittmeier;Jürgen Hellbrück

  • Reading Disability as a Deficit in Functional Coordination

    T. Lachmann

  • Paradoxical enhancement of letter recognition in developmental dyslexia.

    Thomas Lachmann;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Acting your avatar’s age: effects of virtual reality avatar embodiment on real life walking speed

    René Reinhard;Khyati Girish Shah;Corinna A. Faust-Christmann;Thomas Lachmann

  • Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation

    Saskia Jaarsveld;Thomas Lachmann;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Intelligence in creative processes: An EEG study

    Saskia Jaarsveld;Andreas Fink;Marcus Rinner;Daniela Schwab

  • Letter Reversals in Dyslexia: Is the Case Really Closed? A Critical Review and Conclusions

    Thomas Lachmann;Thomas Geyer

  • Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes.

    Cees Van Leeuwen;Thomas Lachmann

  • Effects of Aircraft Noise on Reading and Quality of Life in Primary School Children in Germany Results From the NORAH Study

    Maria Klatte;Jan Spilski;Jochen Mayerl;Ulrich Möhler

  • Event-related brain potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorial and identical comparison conditions.

    Stefan Berti;Hans-Georg Geissler;Thomas Lachmann;Axel Mecklinger

  • Mental Rotation of Letters and Shapes in Developmental Dyslexia

    Patrycja Rusiak;Patrycja Rusiak;Thomas Lachmann;Piotr Jaskowski;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Different letter-processing strategies in diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia.

    Thomas Lachmann;Cees Van Leeuwen

  • Developmental dyslexics show deficits in the processing of temporal auditory information in German vowel length discrimination

    Katarina Groth;Thomas Lachmann;Axel Riecker;Irene Muthmann

  • Contribution of the anterior insula to temporal auditory processing deficits in developmental dyslexia

    Claudia Steinbrink;Hermann Ackermann;Thomas Lachmann;Thomas Lachmann;Axel Riecker

  • Development of Rapid Temporal Processing and Its Impact on Literacy Skills in Primary School Children

    Claudia Steinbrink;Claudia Steinbrink;Karin Zimmer;Thomas Lachmann;Martin Dirichs

  • Memory search instead of template matching? Representation-guided inference in same-different performance.

    Thomas Lachmann;Hans-Georg Geissler

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Berti
Stefan Berti Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Falk Huettig
Falk Huettig Max Planck Society
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Axel Riecker
Axel Riecker University of Ulm
Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Andreas Fink
Andreas Fink University of Graz
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
Alexandra Reis
Alexandra Reis University of Algarve

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up diverse career opportunities, from clinical practice to organizational consulting. Students seeking flexibility and value can find excellent programs across the USA, making it easier to study from anywhere and balance work, life, and learning.

Choosing the right program is critical, and various states offer distinct benefits. For example, the best value psychology degrees in Arizona combine affordability with strong outcomes for graduates. Similarly, those interested in studying in the Pacific region should look at the best value psychology programs in Hawaii, which emphasize unique cultural perspectives and educational value.

Urban centers often provide additional networking and internship opportunities. The best value psychology degrees in Jacksonville are notable for their direct pathway into growing local industries, while the most valuable psychology degrees in New Jersey provide access to dense professional networks and competitive job markets.

Career pathways in psychology are wide-ranging, including counseling, research, human resources, and healthcare administration. By considering both online options and regional advantages, students can personalize their education to fit their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Lachmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles