World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
40171
World Ranking
13883
National Ranking
7049

Amy Chadburn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Chadburn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Amy Chadburn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Chadburn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy Chadburn is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a total of 224 publications. Their research focuses primarily on pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, infectious diseases, immunology, and molecular biology. Within these fields, Chadburn's work covers specialized areas such as lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, viral-associated cancers and disorders, COVID-19 clinical research, CNS lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 studies, and immune cell function and interaction.

Chadburn has published in a variety of scientific venues, showing a pattern of active dissemination of research findings. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Blood
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Cell
  • UNC Libraries
  • Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Significant recent articles featuring their work include:

  • The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms (2022), published in Leukemia
  • Association of Age With SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response (2021), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Epigenetic memory of coronavirus infection in innate immune cells and their progenitors (2023), published in Cell
  • International evidence-based consensus diagnostic and treatment guidelines for unicentric Castleman disease (2020), published in Blood Advances
  • Autopsy Findings in 32 Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Institution Experience (2020), published in Pathobiology

In their collaborative efforts, Amy Chadburn has worked with multiple frequent coauthors known for their roles in medical research, including:

  • Ethel Cesarman
  • He S. Yang
  • Zhen Zhao
  • Sabrina Racine-Brzostek
  • Ari Melnick

Chadburn's scholarly output demonstrates a strong emphasis on understanding the biological and clinical aspects of hematologic malignancies and infectious diseases, particularly within the context of lymphoma and SARS-CoV-2 related conditions. Their research contributions continue to be relevant to ongoing studies in medicine and pathology.

Best Publications

  • Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow–derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth

    David Lyden;Koichi Hattori;Koichi Hattori;Sergio Dias;Carla Costa

  • Accumulation of miR-155 and BIC RNA in human B cell lymphomas

    Peggy S. Eis;Wayne Tam;Liping Sun;Amy Chadburn

  • Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-κB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Mara Compagno;Wei Keat Lim;Adina Grunn;Subhadra V. Nandula

  • Primary effusion lymphoma: a distinct clinicopathologic entity associated with the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus.

    RG Nador;E Cesarman;A Chadburn;DB Dawson

  • CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133 + and CD133 – metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors

    Sergey V. Shmelkov;Jason M. Butler;Andrea T. Hooper;Adilia Hormigo

  • Analysis of the coding genome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Laura Pasqualucci;Vladimir Trifonov;Giulia Fabbri;Jing Ma

  • Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma

    Laura Pasqualucci;David Dominguez-Sola;Annalisa Chiarenza;Giulia Fabbri

  • Genetic and Functional Drivers of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

    Anupama Reddy;Jenny Zhang;Nicholas S. Davis;Andrea B. Moffitt

  • Intestinal Bacteria Trigger T Cell-Independent Immunoglobulin A2 Class Switching by Inducing Epithelial-Cell Secretion of the Cytokine APRIL

    Bing He;Weifeng Xu;Paul A. Santini;Alexandros D. Polydorides

  • Correlative morphologic and molecular genetic analysis demonstrates three distinct categories of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders

    Daniel M. Knowles;Ethel Cesarman;Amy Chadburn;Glauco Frizzera

  • Genetic heterogeneity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Jenny Zhang;Vladimir Grubor;Cassandra L. Love;Anjishnu Banerjee

  • The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma

    Cassandra Love;Zhen Sun;Dereje Jima;Guojie Li

  • International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8–negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease

    David C. Fajgenbaum;Thomas S. Uldrick;Adam Bagg;Dale Frank

  • Autocrine stimulation of VEGFR-2 activates human leukemic cell growth and migration

    Sergio Dias;Koichi Hattori;Zhenping Zhu;Beate Heissig

  • Genetics of Follicular Lymphoma Transformation

    Laura Pasqualucci;Hossein Khiabanian;Marco Fangazio;Mansi Vasishtha

  • Rituximab does not improve clinical outcome in a randomized phase 3 trial of CHOP with or without rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma: AIDS-Malignancies Consortium Trial 010

    Lawrence D. Kaplan;Jeannette Y. Lee;Richard F. Ambinder;Joseph A. Sparano

  • Epithelial cells trigger frontline immunoglobulin class switching through a pathway regulated by the inhibitor SLPI.

    Weifeng Xu;Bing He;April Chiu;Amy Chadburn

  • Outcome of Deferred Initial Therapy in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

    Peter Martin;Amy Chadburn;Paul Christos;Karen Weil

  • Bortezomib Plus CHOP-Rituximab for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma

    Jia Ruan;Peter Martin;Richard R. Furman;Shing M. Lee

  • Lymphoma B cells evade apoptosis through the TNF family members BAFF/BLyS and APRIL.

    Bing He;Amy Chadburn;Erin Jou;Elaine J. Schattner

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel M. Knowles
Daniel M. Knowles Cornell University
Ethel Cesarman
Ethel Cesarman Cornell University
John P. Leonard
John P. Leonard Cornell University
Morton Coleman
Morton Coleman Cornell University
Richard R. Furman
Richard R. Furman NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Andrea Cerutti
Andrea Cerutti Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jonathan W. Said
Jonathan W. Said University of California, Los Angeles
Ari Melnick
Ari Melnick Cornell University
Leo I. Gordon
Leo I. Gordon Northwestern University
Stanley J. Goldsmith
Stanley J. Goldsmith Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending traditional, in-person programs. Numerous affordable online nursing programs make it possible to pursue a nursing degree or advance your skills while maintaining flexibility. These accredited options can be an ideal pathway for those who wish to enter the healthcare field quickly and affordably.

For students interested in administrative or specialized roles, it’s common to ask, how much is medical billing and coding school? Many online programs are cost-effective and provide essential training for administrative positions in healthcare.

Those looking to advance into higher-level roles should consider the cheapest fnp programs, which prepare registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners—an in-demand specialty that offers greater autonomy and earning potential.

If you’re already established in your nursing career and want to pursue leadership or academic roles, earning a phd in nursing can open the door to opportunities in research, teaching, and advanced practice.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Chadburn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles