World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cees van Leeuwen

Cees van Leeuwen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5825
World Ranking
8348
National Ranking
101

Cees van Leeuwen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees van Leeuwen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 271 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Cees van Leeuwen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees van Leeuwen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cees van Leeuwen is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has a research focus primarily in the field of Neuroscience, with numerous contributions to related subfields. Their work spans Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Clinical Psychology, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their research covers a variety of topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Mind wandering and attention

Notable recent publications by Cees van Leeuwen include:

  • A Phase 1, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess Safety and Psychoactive Effects of a Vaporized 5-Methoxy-N, N-Dimethyltryptamine Formulation (GH001) in Healthy Volunteers, 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Multimodal Natural Human-Computer Interfaces for Computer-Aided Design: A Review Paper, 2022, Applied Sciences
  • The No-Report Paradigm: A Revolution in Consciousness Research?, 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Adaptive rewiring of random neural networks generates convergent-divergent units, 2021, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
  • Neural correlates of task-related refixation behavior, 2020, Vision Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Ilias Rentzeperis
  • Andrey R. Nikolaev
  • Thomas Lachmann
  • Roman Bauer
  • Jia Li

Cees van Leeuwen has published regularly in several scientific venues, such as:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Network Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience Applied
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations.

    Johan Wagemans;Jacob Feldman;Sergei Gepshtein;Ruth Kimchi

  • Symbiotic relationship between brain structure and dynamics

    Mikail Rubinov;Mikail Rubinov;Mikail Rubinov;Olaf Sporns;Cees van Leeuwen;Michael Breakspear;Michael Breakspear;Michael Breakspear

  • Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use.

    Lieselotte van Leeuwen;Ad Smitsman;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Stability and intermittency in large-scale coupled oscillator models for perceptual segmentation

    Cees van Leeuwen;Mark Steyvers;Maarten Nooter

  • Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing

    Radha Nila Meghanathan;Cees van Leeuwen;Andrey Andrey R. Nikolaev

  • Combining EEG and eye movement recording in free viewing: Pitfalls and possibilities

    Andrey R. Nikolaev;Radha Nila Meghanathan;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Traveling waves and trial averaging: the nature of single-trial and averaged brain responses in large-scale cortical signals.

    David Alexander;Peter Jurica;Chris Trengove;Andrey Andrey R. Nikolaev

  • Adaptive observers and parameter estimation for a class of systems nonlinear in the parameters

    Ivan Y. Tyukin;Erik Steur;Henk Nijmeijer;Cees Van Leeuwen

  • Spatial and temporal structure of phase synchronization of spontaneous alpha EEG activity

    Junji Ito;Andrey R. Nikolaev;Cees Van Leeuwen

  • Evolution to a small-world network with chaotic units

    Unknown

  • Paradoxical enhancement of letter recognition in developmental dyslexia.

    Thomas Lachmann;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Sketches from a Design Process: Creative Cognition Inferred From Intermediate Products

    Saskia Jaarsveld;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Scale-invariant fluctuations of the dynamical synchronization in human brain electrical activity

    Pulin Gong;Andrey R. Nikolaev;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Abilities Within and Across Visual and Verbal Domains: How Specific Is Their Influence on Creativity?

    Massimiliano Palmiero;Chie Nakatani;Daniel Raver;Marta Olivetti Belardinelli

  • Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation

    Saskia Jaarsveld;Thomas Lachmann;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Dynamics of spontaneous transitions between global brain states

    Junji Ito;Andrey R. Nikolaev;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Robust emergence of small-world structure in networks of spiking neurons

    Hoi Fei Kwok;Hoi Fei Kwok;Hoi Fei Kwok;Peter Jurica;Antonino Raffone;Antonino Raffone;Cees van Leeuwen;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes.

    Cees Van Leeuwen;Thomas Lachmann

  • Coupled nonlinear maps as models of perceptual pattern and memory trace dynamics

    Cees van Leeuwen;Antonino Raffone

  • The interplay of attention and consciousness in visual search, attentional blink and working memory consolidation

    Antonino Raffone;Narayanan Srinivasan;Cees van Leeuwen

  • Intermittent dynamics underlying the intrinsic fluctuations of the collective synchronization patterns in electrocortical activity

    Pulin Gong;Andrey R. Nikolaev;Cees van Leeuwen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Danil V. Prokhorov
Danil V. Prokhorov Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan)
Henk Nijmeijer
Henk Nijmeijer Eindhoven University of Technology
Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Marta Olivetti Belardinelli Sapienza University of Rome
Narayanan Srinivasan
Narayanan Srinivasan Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Markus Diesmann
Markus Diesmann RWTH Aachen University
Michael Breakspear
Michael Breakspear University of Newcastle Australia
Amiram Grinvald
Amiram Grinvald Weizmann Institute of Science
Klaus Mathiak
Klaus Mathiak RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cees van Leeuwen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles